Technology and knowledge transfer from universities to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is seen as one way to strengthen a region's innovation capability. But what if SMEs do not want to play along? Looking back at some 10 years' experience of supporting SMEs, the authors describe in detail the ‘Active Knowledge Transfer’ programme, which aims to facilitate technology and knowledge transfer from universities to SMEs in the Graz region. The aim of the article is to provide an insight into the operational tasks of the programme and to discuss how a more active and broader-ranging approach to technology and knowledge transfer projects can overcome existing barriers between problem ‘owners' and potential problem ‘solvers’.
AdametzC.PloderM. (2003), Innovationsbericht Steiermark 2003, Forschungsgesellschaft JOANNEUM RESEARCH mbH, Graz.
2.
AsheimB. T. (2001), ‘Learning regions as development coalitions: Partnerships as governance in European welfare states?’, Concepts and Transformation, Vol 6, No 1, pp 73–101.
3.
BHEF (2001), Working Together, Creating Knowledge: The University-Industry Collaboration Initiative, Business-Higher Education Forum, Washington, DC.
4.
CookeP. (1996), Networking for Competitive Advantage, National Economic and Social Council, Dublin.
Enterprise Directorate-General (2003), Innobarometer 2002, Innovation Paper No 33, European Commission, Luxembourg.
7.
EtzkowitzH.LeydesdorffL. (1995), ‘The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development’, EASST Review, Vol 14, No 1, pp 11–19.
8.
GruberM.Habsburg-LothringenC.MoroK.Pohn-WeidingerS. (2002), Wirtschaftsbericht 2001, Department for the Development of the Economy and Tourism, Graz.
9.
HanelG. (1996), Typen des Technologienachfrageverhaltens kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen: Ein Segmentierungsversuch als Grundlage für wirtschaftspolitische Maßnahmen, PhD thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna.
10.
MajorE. (2003), ‘Technology transfer and innovation initiatives in strategic management’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 17, No 1, pp 21–27.
11.
McCulloughJ. M. (2003), ‘Technology transfer: Creating the right environment’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 17, No 2, pp 111–117.
12.
NicolayR.WimmersS. (2000), Kundenzufriedenheit der Unternehmen mit Forschungseinrichtungen: Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung zur Zusammenarbeit zwischen Unternehmen und Forschungseinrichtungen, Deutscher Industrie- und Handelstag, Berlin.
ReinhardM. (2001), ‘Absorptionskapazität und Nutzung externen technologischen Wissens in Unternehmen’, Ifo Schnelldienst, Vol 54, No 4, pp 28–39.
15.
RiisJ. O. (2001), ‘University-industry interaction: A means for stimulating manufacturing excellence’, paper presented at the Fourth SMESME International Conference, Aalborg.
16.
SantoroM. D.GopalakrishnanS. (2001), ‘Relationship dynamics between university research centers and industrial firms: Their impact on technology transfer activities’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, pp 163–171.
17.
SchartingerD.SchibanyA.GasslerH. (2001), ‘Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 26, pp 255–268.
18.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1912), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig.
19.
TichyG.WulzH. (1996), Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik: Notwendigkeit, Möglichkeiten und Kosten eines Technologietransfers an österreichischen Klein- und Mittelbetriebe nach dem Steinbeis-Modell, AK Wien, Vienna.
20.
TornatzkyL. G. (2000), Building State Economies by Promoting University-Industry Technology Transfer, National Governors Association, Washington, DC.
