Tasks and problems in problem-based learning (PBL) are supposed to trigger and structure the learning process. The quality of problems in PBL is generally regarded as an important driver of the individual and collaborative learning processes. Although the importance of the PBL task is widely recognized, there is a lack of empirical findings and guidelines for the construction and evaluation of the tasks. The main goal of this study is to develop a valid and useful checklist for the construction and evaluation of PBL tasks. A checklist with critical characteristics of tasks will serve two purposes: it will support instructional designers in creating and constructing appropriate tasks, and it will provide a tool that can be applied to the evaluation of PBL tasks. Data for the study were gathered from a sample of undergraduate students and instructors on a hospitality management programme. Participants filled out a questionnaire with 94 importance and performance statements covering nine characteristics of PBL tasks. The results show that an instrument with 44 items and six factors seems to cover the key characteristics of PBL tasks.
AlexanderP.KulikowichJ.SchulzeS. (1994), ‘The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition’, Learning and Individual Differences, Vol 6, pp 379–397.
2.
AviramA. (2000), ‘Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education’, Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol 19, pp 465–489.
3.
BarrowsH. S.TamblynR.M. (1980), Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education, Springer, New York.
4.
BoudD.FelettiG., eds (1991), The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, Kogan Page, London.
5.
ChoK.-L.JonassenD.H. (2002), ‘The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol 50, No 3, pp 5–22.
6.
DochyF.SegersM.BuehlM.M. (1999), ‘The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge’, Review of Educational Research, Vol 69, No 2, pp 145–186.
7.
DochyF.J.R.C. (1992), Assessment of Prior Knowledge as a Determinant for Future Learning: The Use of Prior Knowledge State Tests and Knowledge Profiles, Lemma, Utrecht.
8.
DolmansD.H.J.M. (1994), How Students Learn in a Problem-Based Curriculum, Universitaire Pers Maastricht, Maastricht.
9.
DolmansD.H.J.M.Snellen-BalendongH. (1997), Constructie van taken in probleemgestuurd onderwijs, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen.
10.
DolmansD.H.J.M.GijselaersW. H.MoustJ.H.C.De GraveW.S.WolfhagenI.H.A.P.Van der VleutenC.P.M. (2002), ‘Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: Conclusions and implications for educational practice and research’, Medical Teacher, Vol 24, No 2, pp 173–180.
11.
DolmansD.H.J.M.Snellen-BalendongH.WolfhagenI.H.A.P.Van der VleutenC.P.M. (1997), ‘Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum’, Medical Teacher, Vol 19, No 3, pp 185–190.
12.
DuchB.J. (2001), ‘Writing problems for deeper understanding’, in DuchB.J.GrohS.E.AllenD.E., eds, The Power of Problem-based Learning, Stylus, Sterling, pp 47–53.
13.
EngeströmY. (1999), ‘Activity theory and individual and social transformation’, in EngeströmY.MiettinenR.PunamäkiR.-L., eds, Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–38.
14.
Hernandez-SerranoJ.JonassenD.H. (2003), ‘The effects of case libraries on problem solving’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol 19, pp 103–114.
15.
JacobsA.E.J.P.DolmansD.H.J.M.WolfhagenI.H.A.P.ScherpbierA.J.J.A. (2003), ‘Validation of a short questionnaire to assess the degree of complexity and structuredness of PBL problems’, Medical Education, Vol 37, pp 1001–1007.
16.
JacobsA.E.J.P.WolfhagenI.H.A.P.DolmansD.H.J.M.ScherpbierA.J.J.A. (2004), ‘Meten van complexiteit en gestructureerdheid van pgo-problemen’, Onderwijsinnovatie, Vol 6, No 1, pp 17–24.
17.
JonassenD.H. (2003), ‘Using cognitive tools to represent problems’, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol 35, No 3, pp 362–381.
18.
JonassenD.H. (1997), ‘Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol 45, No 1, pp 65–94.
19.
JonassenD.H. (2000), ‘Toward a design theory of problem solving’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol 48, No 4, pp 63–85.
20.
JonassenD.H.PeckK.L.WilsonB.G. (1999), Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21.
KiersH. (2002), De Multipele Groep Methode, unpublished document, Groningen.
22.
LarochelleM.BednarzN.GarrisonJ., eds (1998), Constructivism and Education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23.
MpofuD.J.S.DasM.MurdochJ.C.LanphearJ.H. (1997), ‘Effectiveness of problems used in problem-based learning’, Medical Education, Vol 31, pp 330–334.
24.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.
25.
PetragliaJ. (1998), Reality by Design: The Rhetoric and Technology of Authenticity in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
26.
PhillipsD.C. (1995), ‘The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism’, Educational Researcher, Vol 24, No 7, pp 5–12.
27.
PhillipsD.C. (2000), ‘An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape’, in PhillipsD.C., ed, Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 1–16.
28.
SalomonG. (1998), ‘Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be concerned with’, Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, Vol 1, No 1, pp 3–12.
29.
SchmidtH.MoustJ. (1996), ‘Construeren van probleemtaken voor probleemgestuurd leren’, VELON: Tijdschrift voor Lerarenopleiders, Vol 17, No 3, pp 5–7.
30.
SchmidtH.G.GijselaersW.H. (1990), ‘Causal modeling of problem-based learning’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, April.
31.
SchwartzP.MenninS.WebbG. (2001), Problem-Based Learning: Case Studies, Experience and Practice, Kogan Page, London.
32.
ShapiroA.M. (2004), ‘How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research’, American Educational Research Journal, Vol 41, No 1, pp 159–190.
33.
SilenC. (2006), ‘The tutor's approach in base groups (PBL)’, Higher Education, Vol 51, pp 373–385.
34.
SteffeL.P.GaleJ., eds (1995), Constructivism in Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
35.
Ten BergeH.RamaekersS.PilotA. (2004), ‘The design of authentic tasks that promote higher order learning’, paper presented at the EARLI-SIG Higher Education/KIT-conference, 18–21 June.
36.
Van den HurkM.M.WolfhagenI.H.A.P.DolmansD.H.J.M.Van der VleutenC.P.M. (1999), ‘The impact of student-generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement’, Medical Education, Vol 33, pp 808–814.
37.
Van der VleutenC.P.M.DolmansD.H.J.M.ScherpbierA.J.J.A. (2000), ‘The need for evidence in education’, Medical Teacher, Vol 22, No 3, pp 246–250.
38.
Van MerriënboerJ.G.KirschnerP.A.KesterL. (2003), ‘Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning’, Educational Psychologist, Vol 38, No 1, pp 5–13.
39.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1995), Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning, Falmer Press, London.
40.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1998), ‘Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching’, in MatthewsM.R., ed, Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 11–30.
41.
Von GlasersfeldE. (2000), ‘Problems of constructivism’, in SteffeL.P.ThompsonP.W., eds, Radical Constructivism in Action: Building on the Pioneering Work of Ernst von Glasersfeld, RoutledgeFalmer, London, pp 3–9.
42.
VygotskyL.S. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
43.
WilsonB. G., ed (1996), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
44.
WilliamsS.M. (1992), ‘Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol 2, No 4, pp 367–427.
