The process of knowledge transfer has been extensively studied in the context of a variety of theoretical considerations. In this paper the authors adopt a communication theory perspective and focus on capacity for dissemination. Many studies assume that universities are able to disseminate and commercialize their knowledge (and technology). However, it has been shown in practice that dissemination and commercialization can be problematic. Following a review of the literature, the authors identify four topics connected with dissemination capacity: (1) the purpose of knowledge transfer; (2) the transformation of knowledge; (3) the importance of valuable knowledge from a respectable source; and (4) issues of network and inter-organizational dynamics that offer suggestions for further research. For each of these four topics, propositions are formulated as signposts for further studies and the implications for research in this area are outlined.
AmbosT.MakelaK.BirkinshawJ.d'EsteP. (2008), ‘When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol 45, No 8, pp 1424–1447.
2.
ArgoteL.IngramP. (2000), ‘Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol 82, No 1, pp 150–169.
3.
BaakenT. (2002), ‘Science marketing’, grant application to the Ministry of Education of North-Rhine Westphalia.
4.
BapujiH.CrossanM. (2005), ‘Co-evolution of social capital and knowledge: An extension of the Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998) framework’, Academy of Management, Best Conference Paper.
5.
BaskervilleR.DulipoviciA. (2006), ‘The theoretical foundations of knowledge management’, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, Vol 4, pp 83–105.
6.
BhattG.D. (2001), ‘Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 5, No 1, pp 68–75.
7.
CarlosC.ParkS. (2008), ‘Disseminative capacity: University technology transfer and entrepreneurial activity’, paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, August 2008, Anaheim, CA.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990), ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 35, pp 128–152.
10.
CuyversR.ZimmermannE. (2002), ‘KULeuven R&D als netwerkincubator voor nieuwe, kennis intensieve bedrijven’ [‘KULeuven R&D as network incubator for new knowledge intensive companies’], in DebackereK.de BondtR., eds, Leuven Research and Development, Universitaire Pers Leuven, Leuven.
11.
DarrE.KurtzbergT. (2000), ‘An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol 82, No 1, pp 28–44.
12.
DosiG.LlerenaP.LabiniM.S. (2006), ‘The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called “European Paradox”’, Research Policy, Vol 35, pp 1450–1464.
13.
Easterby-SmithS.M.LylesM.A.TsangE.W.K. (2008), ‘Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol 45, No 4, pp 677–690.
14.
GoldA.H.MalhotraA.SegarsA.H. (2001), ‘Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol 18, No 1, pp 185–214.
15.
GibbertM.LeiboldM.ProbstG. (2002), ‘Five styles of customer knowledge management and how smart companies use them to create value’, European Journal of Management, Vol 20, pp 459–469.
16.
GrantR.M. (1996), ‘Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 17, pp 109–122.
HåkansonL. (2007), ‘Creating knowledge: The power and logic of articulation’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol 16, No 1, pp 51–88.
19.
JensenR.L.SzulanskiG. (2006), ‘Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer’, (unpublished paper).
20.
JongbloedB.Van der SijdeP.C. (2008a), ‘Over het slechten van barrières voor kennistransfer tussen Universiteit en MKB’, Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, Vol 26, No 3, pp 167–179.
21.
JongbloedB.Van der SijdeP.C. (2008b), Interacties Tussen Universiteit en MKB – een Verkenning in het Kader van het 3TU Beleidsexperiment, CHEPS/Nikos, Enschede.
22.
JoshiK.D.SarkerS.SarkerS. (2007), ‘Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes’, Decision Support Systems, Vol 43, pp 322–335.
23.
KotabeM.MartinX.DormotoH. (2003), ‘Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer relationships duration, and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industry’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 24, pp 293–316.
24.
KuikenJ. (2010), ‘Kennisoverdracht aan Nederlandse universiteiten: De missie op het gebied van kennisoverdracht, de TTO activiteiten en de competenties van de TTO medewerkers’ (‘Knowledge transfer at Dutch universities: Mission, TTO activities and competences of TT-officers’), MSc Thesis, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
25.
LiaoJ.WelschH.StoicaM. (2003), ‘Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: An empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 28, No 1, pp 63–85.
26.
LelouxM.Van der SijdeP.C.GroenA. (2009), ‘Evolutionary business valuation in technology transfer’, in OakeyR.GroenA.CookG.Van der SijdeP. eds, New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millenium, Volume VII: The Production and Distribution of Knowledge’, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley.
27.
LinL.GengX.WhinstonA.B. (2005), ‘A sender–receiver framework for knowledge transfer’, MIS Quarterly, Vol 29, No 2, pp 197–219.
28.
LiyanageS.BarnhardR. (2003), ‘Valuing of firms’ prior knowledge: A measure of knowledge distance’, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol 10, No 2, pp 85–98.
29.
MartinX.Y.F.SalomonR. (2003), ‘Knowledge transfer capacity: Its implications for the theory of multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 34, No 4, pp 356–373.
30.
MinbaevaD.B.MichailovaS. (2004), ‘Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations – the role of dissemination capacity’, Employee Relations, Vol 26, No 6, pp 663–679.
31.
MinbaevaD.B. (2007), ‘Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations’, Management International Review, Vol 47, No 4, pp 567–593.
32.
MoweryD.C.SampatB.N., (2005), ‘The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments?’, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol 30, No 1/2, pp 115–127.
33.
MuJ.TangF.MaclachlanD.L. (2010), ‘Absorptive and disseminative capacity: Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks’, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol 37, pp 31–38.
34.
NonakaI.TaguichiH. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35.
OppatK. (2008), Disseminative Capabilities: A Case Study of Collaborative Product Development in the Automotive Industry, GWV Fachverlag GmbH, Wiesbaden.
36.
ParentR.RoyM.St JacquesD. (2007), ‘A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol 11, No 6, pp 81–93.
37.
ReagansR.McEvilyB. (2003), ‘Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 48, pp 240–267.
38.
RogersE.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, Glencoe.
39.
RothaermelF.T.AgungS.D.JiangL. (2007), ‘University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol 16, pp 691–791.
SzulanskiG. (1996), ‘Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 17, pp 27–43.
42.
SzulanskiG.JensenR.J. (2006), ‘Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 27, pp 937–957.
43.
TangF.MuJ.MacLachlanD.L. (2009), ‘Disseminative capacity, organizational structure and knowledge transfer’, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol 37, No 2, pp 1586–1593.
44.
TodorovaG.DurisinB. (2007), ‘Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 32, No 3, pp 774–786.
45.
TsaiW. (2001), ‘Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 44, No 5, pp 996–1004.
46.
Van der SijdeP.C.CuyversR. (2003), ‘Training researchers to commercialize the results of research’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 17, No 1, pp 29–36.
47.
Van der SijdeP.C.KekaleJ. (2002), ‘The region and its university: European perspectives’, Industry and Higher Education, Vol 16, No 2, pp 73–121.
48.
Van VlietH.SlotmanR. (2006), ‘De regio als basis voor innovatie in het MKB’, [‘The region as a basis for innovation in SMEs’], THEMA (Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs en Management), Vol 13, pp 30–36.
49.
ZahraS.GeorgeG. (2002), ‘Absorptive capacity, a review, reconceptualization and extension’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 27, No 2, pp 185–203.
50.
Zellmer-BruhnM.E. (2003), ‘Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition’, Management Science, Vol 49, pp 514–528.
51.
ZollaM.WinterS.G. (2002), ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities’, Organization Science, Vol 13, No 3, pp 339–351.
