In this paper the concept of knowledge circulation is explored and placed in a social systems approach that distinguishes four types of ‘capital’: cultural, strategic, network and economic. Knowledge circulation is a form of university–industry interaction that accommodates the objectives of what are, in many respects, unequal partners and outlines the capital gains for all participants. In the final section, the implications for the internal and external marketing of science are presented.
ChesbroughH. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
2.
GroenA.J. (2005), ‘Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship in networks: Toward a multi-level/multi-dimensional approach’, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol 13, No 1, pp 69–88.
3.
GranovetterM. (1973), ‘The strengths of weak ties’, Journal of Sociology, Vol 78, pp 1360–1380.
4.
ProTon–Europe (2004), Effective Collaborative R&D and Knowledge Transfer, Conference Report, joint publication of EUA, ProTon, EARTO and EIRMA, Brussels and Paris.
5.
Responsible Partnering (2009), Joining Forces in a World of Open Innovation: Guidelines for Collaborative Research and Knowledge Transfer Between Science and Industry, joint publication of EUA, ProTon, EARTO and EIRMA, Brussels and Paris.
6.
StokesD.E. (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant, Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
TornatskyL.G.WaugamanP.G.GrayD.O. (2002), Innovation U: New University Roles in a Knowledge Economy, Southern Growth Policies Board, Research Triangle Park, NC.
9.
Van der SijdeP.C. (2005), ‘Kenniscirculatie en een ondernemende kennisinstellingen: Ingrediënten voor een ondernemende regio’ ('Knowledge circulation and an entrepreneurial knowledge institute; ingredients for an entrepreneurial region’), Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, Vol 23, No1, pp 44–61.
10.
WhiteM. (2000), Leonardo: The First Scientist, St Martin's Griffin, New York.
