The context in which agronomy research takes place has changed fundamentally over the last 40 years, with important implications for the discipline. Systematic study of the new politics of agronomy is particularly important in an era when the whole basis of global and sustainable food security is under question. One critical challenge is to analyse the forces driving claims on the universality of technology and approaches.
GloverD. (2010), ‘The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor’, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol 37, No 1, pp 67–90, doi: 10.1080/03066150903498754.
2.
SumbergJ.IrvingR.AdamsE.ThompsonJ. (2012b), ‘Success making and success stories: Agronomic research in the spotlight’, in SumbergJ.ThompsonJ., eds, Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, Routledge, London.
3.
SumbergJ.KeeneyD.DempseyB. (2012a), ‘Public agronomy: Norman Borlaug as “brand hero” for the Green Revolution’, Journal of Development Studies, Vol 48, No 11, pp 1587–1600, doi: 10.1080/00220388.2012.713470.
4.
SumbergJ.ThompsonJ., eds (2012), Contested Agronomy: Agricultural Research in a Changing World, Routledge, London.
5.
SumbergJ.ThompsonJ.WoodhouseP. (2012c), ‘Why agronomy in the developing world has become contentious’, Agriculture and Human Values, pp 1–13, doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9376-8.
6.
WoodhouseP. (2010), ‘Beyond industrial agriculture? Some questions about farm size, productivity and sustainability’, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol 10, No 3, pp 437–453.
