The electricity sector is the largest source of greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions in the world, and reducing these emissions can often be costly. However, because electricity markets remain integrated at a shallow level (with different pricing regulations), many gains from deeper integration (adoption of marginal cost pricing everywhere) are yet to be realized. This paper assesses the benefits of deep integration between a “hydro” jurisdiction and a “thermal” one. It also underscores the inefficiency of trade when pricing rules differ. Our detailed hourly model, calibrated with real data from the provinces of Ontario and Quebec, Canada, estimates price, consumption, emissions and welfare changes associated with fully integrating electricity markets, under transmission constraints. A negative abatement cost of $37/tonne of CO2 was found (for more than 1 million tonnes), clearly illustrating the untapped potential of wealth creation in carbon reduction initiatives. Furthermore, given the inefficiency of shallow integration between markets, we found that removing interconnections between markets offers a relatively affordable CO2-reduction opportunity, at $21.5/tonne.
BC Hydro (2012). “BC Hydro Annual Report 2012.” Vancouver: BC Hydro.
2.
Billette de VillemeurE.PineauP.-O. (2010). “Environmentally Damaging Electricity Trade.” Energy Policy38 (3): 1548-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.038.
3.
Billette de VillemeurE.PineauP.-O. (2012). “Regulation and Electricity Market Integration: When Trade Introduces Inefficiencies.” Energy Economics34 (2): 529-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.004.
4.
Billette de VillemeurE.VinellaA. (2011). “Long-term contracting in hydro-thermal electricity generation: Welfare and environmental impact.” Utilities Policy19 (1): 20-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2010.06.003.
5.
ECA (2010). “The Potential of Regional Power Sector Integration - Literature Review.” London: Economic Consulting Associates.
6.
EIA (2007). “Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2007.” Washington D.C.: Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy.
7.
Environment Canada (2008). “National Inventory Report 1990-2006 - The Canadian Government’s Submission to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.” Ottawa: Environment Canada.
8.
Environment Canada (2009). “National Inventory Report 1990-2007 - The Canadian Government’s Submission to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.” Ottawa: Environment Canada.
9.
EPRI (2007). “Assessment of Waterpower Potential and Development Needs.” Palo Alto: Electric Power Research Institute. FERC (2005). “Remedying Undue Discrimination through Open Access Transmission Service and Standard Electricity Market Design - Order Terminating Proceeding.” Washington D.C.: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. RM01-12-000.
10.
FinonD.RomanoE. (2009). “Electricity market integration: Redistribution effect versus resource allocation.” Energy Policy37 (8): 2977-2985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.045.
11.
F0rsundF.R. (2007). Hydropower Economics:112. International Series in Operations Research &Management Science. Boston: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73027-1.
12.
F0rsundF.R.SinghB.JensenT.LarsenC. (2008). “Phasing in wind-power in Norway: network congestion and crowding-out of hydropower.” Energy Policy36 (9): 3514-3520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.005.
13.
GreenR.VasilakosN. (2012). “Storing Wind for a Rainy Day: What Kind of Electricity Does Denmark Export?” The Energy Journal33(3): 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.333.1.
14.
HallD.G.ReevesK.S. (2006). “A Study of United States Hydroelectric Plant Ownership.” Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory, INL/EXT-06-11519. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/911556.
15.
HQ TransÉnergie (2006). “Our System at a Glance.” Montreal: Hydro-Quebec, web page accessed February 2,2009. http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/en/reseau/bref.html
Hydro-Quebec Production (2009). “Thermal and Nuclear Generating Stations.” Montreal: Hydro-Quebec, web page accessed February 2,2009. http://www.hydroquebec.com/generation/classics/index.html
19.
IEA (2005). “Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - 2005 Update.” Paris: International Energy Agency.
IFC (2002). “Economic Assessment of RTO Policy.” Fairfax: ICF Consulting.
26.
IPCC (2007). “Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report - An Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
27.
LijesenM. G. (2007). “The real-time price elasticity of electricity.” Energy Economics29(2): 249-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.08.008.
28.
MRNF (2009). “Puissance des centrales electriques.” Quebec: Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et Faune, web page accessed February 2,2009. http://www.mrn.gouv.qc.ca/energie/statistiques/statistiques-production-centrales.jsp
29.
NERC (2008). “Electricity Supply &Demand 2007.” Princeton: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
30.
NERC (2011). “Glossary of Terms Used in NERC Reliability Standards - Updated October 26 2011.” Princeton: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
31.
NewberyD.M. (2000). Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network utilities. Second Printing Cambridge: The MIT Press.
32.
PineauP.-O. (2013). “Fragmented Markets: Canadian Electricity Sectors’ Underperformance.” In SioshansiF.P. ed., Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New paradigms, new challenges, new approaches. Waltham, MA: Academic Press. Chapter13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397891-2.00013-4.
33.
PineauP.-O.LefebvreV. (2009). “The Value of Unused Interregional Transmission: Estimating the Opportunity Cost for Quebec (Canada).” International Journal of Energy Sector Management3(4): 406-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506220911005768.
34.
Province of British Columbia (2009). “Backgrounder - B.C.’s Revenue-neutral Carbon Tax.” webpage accessed on January 15th 2009, 3:20 p.m. http://www.bcbudget.gov.bc.ca/2008/backgrounders/backgrounder_carbon_tax.htm
35.
RangelL. F. (2008). “Competition policy and regulation in hydro-dominated electricity markets.” Energy Policy36(4): 1292-1302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.005.
36.
Statistics Canada (2009). “Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution 2007.” Ottawa: Statistics, Canada Catalogue no. 57-202-X.
37.
StoftS. (2002). Power Systems Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. Piscataway: IEEE Press and New York: Wiley-Interscience. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/9780470545584.
38.
TolR.S.J. (2005). “The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties.” Energy Policy33(16): 2064-2074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.002.
39.
UN (2006). “Multi Dimensional Issues in International Electric Power Grid Interconnections.” Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development, New York: United Nations.
40.
UNECA (2006). “Assessing Regional Integration in Africa II: Rationalizing Regional Economic Communities.” Addis Ababa: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa and African Union.
41.
WEC (2005). “Regional Energy Integration in Africa.” London: World Energy Council.
42.
World Bank (2010). “Regional Power Sector Integration: Lessons from Global Case Studies and a Literature Review, Regional Energy Integration Strategies Program - Solving Energy Challenges through Regional Cooperation.” Energy Sector Management Assistance Program, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
43.
ZareipourH.BhattacharyaK.CañizaresC.A. (2007). “Electricity market price volatility: The case of Ontario.” Energy Policy35(9): 4739-4748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
