The impact of carbon prices on consumer behavior is a central element in current policy debates dealing with mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. We examine the impact of British Columbia’s carbon tax on private automobile gasoline use.We control for several factors that influenced gasoline demand during our study period, including local public transit improvements and increased cross-border shopping. Our results suggest that a 5 cent per litre carbon tax reduced gasoline consumption by 8%. We find that households residing in Vancouver and other cities responded to the carbon tax, whereas households in small towns and rural areas did not respond. We perform several sensitivity analyses. Even our most conservative lower bound estimate suggests that a 5 cent per litre carbon tax reduced gasoline consumption by 5%.
AngristJ.D.PischkeJ.S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
2.
AntweilerW.GulatiS. (2012). “Policy forum: Reducing the environmental impact of transportation—British Columbia’s tax policy initiatives.” Canadian Tax Journal, 60(4): 869-879.
3.
AntweilerW.GulatiS. (2016). “Frugal Cars or Frugal Drivers? How carbon and fuel taxes influence the choice and use of cars.” SSRN Working Paper 2778868, May2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2778868.
4.
BarrettG.LevellP.MilliganK. (2014). A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods. NBER Chapters, 263-286.
BentoA.M.CropperM.L.MobarakA.M.VinhaK. (2005). “The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3): 466-78. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653054638292.
7.
BC Stats. 2016, May 12. Household estimates and projections. (http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/StatisticsBySubject/Demogra-phy/Households.aspx)
8.
BronsMartijnNijkampPeterPelsEricRietveldPiet (2008). “A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand: A SUR approach.” Energy Economics, 30(5): 2105-2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.004.
9.
BrownstoneD.GolobT.F. (2009). “The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption.” Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1): 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjue.2008.09.002.
10.
CaoX.MokhtarianP.L.HandyS. L. (2009). “Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings.” Transport Reviews, 29(3): 359-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802539195.
11.
ChangD.SerletisA. (2014). “The demand for gasoline: evidence from household survey data.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29(2): 291-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2312.
12.
ChouinardHayleyPerloffJeffrey (2004). “Incidence of federal and state gasoline taxes.” Economics Letters, 83(1): 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.10.004.
13.
CoglianeseJ.DavisL.W.KilianL.StockJ.H. (2016). “Anticipation, tax avoidance, and the price elasticity of gasoline demand.”Forthcoming, Journal of Applied Econometrics.
14.
DavisLucas W.KilianLutz (2011). “Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(7): 1187-1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1156.
15.
DurantonG.TurnerM. (2011). “The Fundamental law of road congestion: Evidence from US cities.” The American Economic Review, 101: 2616-2652. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10L6.2616.
16.
ElgieStewartMcMlayJessica (2013). “BC’s carbon tax shift is working well after four years.” Canadian Public Policy, 39(s2): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3138/CPP.39.Supplement2.S1.
17.
EspeyM. (1996). “Explaining the Variation in Elasticity Estimates of Gasoline Demand in the United States: A Meta-Analysis.” The Energy Journal, 17(3): 49-60. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol17-No3-4.
18.
FrondelM.VanceC. (2013). “Re-identifying the rebound: what about asymmetry?.” The Energy Journal, 34(4): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.4.3.
19.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models (Vol. 1). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GillinghamK.Munk-NielsenA. (2016). A Tale of Two Tails: Commuting and the Fuel Price Response in Driving (No. w22937). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22937.
21.
GoelR.K.NelsonM.A. (1999). “The political economy of motor-fuel taxation.” The Energy Journal, 20(1): 43-59. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol20-No1-3.
22.
GruberJ.SenA.StabileM. (2003). “Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: the sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada.” Journal of Health Economics, 22 (5): 821-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00058-4.
23.
HammarH.LofgrenA.SternerT. (2004). “Political economy obstacles to fuel taxation.” The Energy Journal, 25(3):1-17. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No3-1.
24.
HolianMatthew J.KahnMatthew E. (2015). “Household Demand for Low Carbon Policies: Evidence from California.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2(2): 205-235. https://doi.org/10.1086/680663.
25.
HughesJonathan E.KnittelChristopher R.SperlingDaniel (2008). “Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand.” The Energy Journal, 29(1): 113-134. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No1-9.
26.
KayserH.A. (2000). “Gasoline demand and car choice: estimating gasoline demand using household information.” Energy Economics, 22(3): 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00043-2.
27.
KnittelC.R. (2014). “The Political Economy of Gasoline Taxes: Lessons from the Oil Embargo.” Tax Policy and the Economy, 28(1): 97-131. https://doi.org/10.1086/675589.
28.
LevinL.LewisM.S.WolakF.A. (2017). “High frequency evidence on the demand for gasoline.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3): 314-347. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140093.
29.
LiShanjunLinnJoshuaMuehleggerErich (2014). “Gasoline taxes and consumer behavior.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(4): 302-342. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.4.302.
30.
MannJanelle (2016). “Rockets and feathers meet markup margins: Applications to the oil and gasoline industry.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 49(2): 772-788. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12213.
31.
MarionJustinMuehleggerErich (2011). “Fuel tax incidence and supply conditions.” Journal of Public Economics, 95(9): 1201-1212. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16863.
32.
MurrayB.RiversN. (2015). “British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: A review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental .” Energy Policy, 86: 674-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.011.
33.
PeetChelseaHarrisonKathryn (2012). “Historical legacies and policy reform: Diverse regional reactions to British Columbia’s carbon tax.” BC Studies, 173(2012): 95-120.
34.
RiversNicholasSchaufeleBrandon (2015). “Salience of carbon taxes in the gasoline market.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 74: 23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjeem.2015.07.002.
35.
SmallK.A.Van DenderK. (2007). “Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect.” The Energy Journal, 28(1): 25-51. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No1-2.
36.
SpillerElishebaStephensHeather M.ChenYong (2017). “Understanding the heterogeneouse effects of gasoline taxes across income and location.” Resource and Energy Economics, 50(2017): 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenee-co.2017.07.002.
Statistics Canada (2016). May 12. CANSIM Table 427-0001: Number of international travellers entering or returning to Canada, by type of transport. (http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&id=4270001)
39.
TremblayJ.LynchJ.DubreuilG. (2010). “Pilot survey results from the Canadian Survey of Household Spending Redesign.” Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings 2010, Section on Survey Research Methods.
40.
WadudZiaGrahamDaniel J.NolandRobert (2010). “Gasoline demand with heterogeneity in household responses.” The Energy Journal, 31(1): 47-74. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No1-3.
41.
WestS. E.WilliamsR.C. (2004). “Estimates from a consumer demand system: Implications for the incidence of environmental taxes.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(3): 535-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.11.004.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
