Engineers of the 21st century are expected not only to be technical experts but also to integrate science and technology into society as a whole. We have compared the electrical engineering programmes of 24 Turkish and 87 North American universities with the revised electrical engineering programme of Eastern Mediterranean University.
BordognaJ., ‘Making connections: The role of engineers and engineering education,’The Bridge, 27(1) (1997).
2.
UddinM., ‘Liberation of international engineering education with the paradigm of liberal education,’ in Proc. ICEE'99 Conference, Ostrava/Prague, 10–14 August, 1999, Paper no. 402 (1999).
3.
BuchalR. O., ‘Engineering education in the 21st century,’ paper presented at the 1996 ASEE Annual Conference, Washington DC, Session 2358 (1996).
4.
BritoC. R. and BritoM. C. T. R., ‘The 21st century engineer: A new proposal for engineering education,’ in Proc. ICEE'98 Conference, Rio de Janeiro, 17–20 August 1998, Paper no. 168 (1998).
5.
ThomD., ‘Engineering education and the New Industrial Revolution,’Intl J. Enging Educ., 14 (1998), 89–94.
6.
DetertK., ‘New engineering curricula in Germany: An attempt to modernise and globalise engineering education,’Global J. Enging Educ., 3(2) (1999), 85–93.
7.
WebsterJ., ‘Engineering education in Australia,’Intl J. Enging Educ., 16(2) (2000), 146–153.
8.
GeppertL., ‘Educating the Renaissance engineer,’IEEE Spectrum, 32 (1995), 39–43.
9.
ParrishE. A., ‘Directions for engineering education in the United States,’ paper presented at the Japan-US Flexible Manufacturing Symposium, Boston, 7–10 July 1996.
10.
TadmorZ., Engineering Education 2001 (The Neaman Press, Haifa, 1987).
11.
BilselA. and ErdilE., ‘Experience gained in applying ABET Criteria to an electrical/electronic engineering programme in a Turkish university,’Intl J. Enging Educ., 20(1) (2004), 77–82.
12.
AkdumanI.OzkaleL. and EkinciE., ‘Accreditation in Turkish universities,’Eur. J. Enging Educ., 26(3) (2001), 231–239.
13.
See the web pages of the following universities: Anadolu, Ankara, Başkent, Bilkent, Boğaziçi, Çukurova, Dicle, Dokuz Eylül, Firat, Gazi, Gaziantep, Hacettepe, Inönü, Işik, Kadir Has, Kahramanmaraş, Karadeniz Tech, Koç, Mersin, Mustafa Kemal, ODTÜ, Sakarya, Uludağ, Yeditepe, Yildiz Tech.
14.
See the web pages of the following universities: Akron, Alfred, Arizona, Auburn, Boise State, Bradley, California State LA, California State Sacramento, CalPoly State, Case Western Reserve, Catholic, Colorado, Colorado State, Columbia, Dayton, Delaware, Florida, Florida Atlantic, George Mason, Georgia Tech, Howard, Idaho, IIT, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Lehigh, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mercer, Miami, Michigan, Michigan State, Milwaukee, Minnesota, Mississippi State, Montana State, Morgan State, Nebraska Lincoln, New Hampshire, New Haven, New Mexico, New Mexico Tech, New Orleans, North Carolina State, North Dakota State, North Florida, Northern Arizona, North Carolina, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Old Dominion, Oregon State, Penn State, Pittsburgh, Polytechnic, Portland, Purdue, Rensselaer Poly, Rhode Island, Rose Hulman, Rowan, Rutgers, San Diego State, Seattle Pacific, South Alabama, South Carolina, Southern California, Southern Illinois, St. Cloud State, Syracuse, Tennessee Knoxwille, Tennessee Technological, Texas Austin, Toledo, Tulane, Utah, Utah State, Valparaiso, Washington, Washington State, Widener, Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Milwaukee, Wright State.
15.
VroeijenstijnA. I.WaumansB. L. A. and WijmansJ., International Programme Review of Electrical Engineering (VSNU, Utrecht, 1992).
16.
AspensJ., ‘A summary and analysis of Bachelor of Science Degree requirements reported by 125 electrical engineering departments,’IEEE Trans. Educ., 37 (1994), 122–130.
17.
BilselA.OralO. and PillaiJ., ‘Turkish and American engineering programmes: A comparative study of curricular emphases on mathematics, basic sciences, humanities, and social sciences,’IEEE Trans. Educ., 41(4) (1998), 247–252.
18.
PradosJ. W., ‘Engineering education in the United States: Past, present, and future,’ in Proc. ICEE'98 Conference, Rio de Janeiro, 17–20 August, 1998.
19.
O'NealJ. B., ‘The humanities and their effect on engineering education,’IEEE Communications Magazine, December (1990), 30–35.
20.
CywinskiZ., ‘Humanities and arts — Essential agents of contemporary engineering education’, in SzpytkoJ. (eds), Humanities and Arts in a Balanced Engineering Education, Proc. SEFI Annual Conf., Cracow, Poland, 8–10 September 1997, pp. 22–35.
21.
EpsteinM., ‘Meeting the challenge of humanistic engineering’, University of Calgary Report, Dean's Series on Engineering Education, no. 3 (1998).
22.
MechefskeC. K., ‘Making ‘Mickey Mouse’ mandatory: Understanding the importance of the nontechnical aspects of an engineering curriculum,’Proc. Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, Arizona, 4–7 November (1998).
23.
BilselA. and OralO., ‘The role of the humanities and social sciences in engineering education’, in SaglamerG.MelezinekA. and IncecikS. (eds), Engineering Education in the Third Millenium, vol. 2 (Leuchtturm, Alsbach, 1999), pp. 629–634.
