This study posits a theory to explain government and dissident sequential responses to one another and develops a statistical model to test the implied hypotheses. While competing hypotheses emerge from both formal and empirical models, the current literature lacks a single, coherent, theoretical, and empirically corroborated model of the interactive relationship between dissident and government behavior. The study seeks to fill this lacuna in the literature by developing a comprehensive theory to account for a large number of competing hypotheses within a single framework. The subsequent empirical tests enable one to find support for the various competing hypotheses under different sets of conditions. The analyses of Chile (1983—1992) and Venezuela (1987— 1992) provide evidence that the model captures well the sequential responses of Chilean and Venezuelan governments and dissidents.
Alt, J., G. King, and C.S. Signorino.2001. Aggregation among binary, count and duration models. Political Analysis9(1): 21-44.
2.
Ames, B.1987. Political survival: Politicians and public policy in Latin America. Berkley: University of California Press.
3.
Azar, E.E., and T. Sloan.1975. Dimensions of interactions. Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh.
4.
Box, G.E.P., and G.M. Jenkins.1976. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, rev. ed. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
5.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., and D. Lalman.1992. War and reason: Domestic and international imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., J.D. Morrow, R.M. Siverson, and A. Smith.1999. An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Political Science Review93(4): 791-808.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R.M. Siverson, and J.D. Morrow.2003. The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Carey, S.2006. The dynamic relationship between protest, repression, and political regimes. Political Research Quarterly. (at press).
9.
Chiozza, G., and H.E. Goemans.2004. International conflict and the tenure of leaders: Is war still ex post inefficient? American Journal of Political Science48(3): 604-19.
10.
Chong, D.1991. Collective action and the civil rights movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Colaresi, M.2004. When doves cry: International rivalry, unreciprocated cooperation, and leadership turnover. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 555-570.
12.
Constable, P., and A. Valenzuela.1992. A nation of enemies: Chile under Pinochet . New York: W. W. Norton.
13.
Davenport, C.1995. Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression In inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. American Journal of Political Science38(3): 683-713.
14.
Davis, D.R., B. Ashley Leeds, and W.H. Moore.1998. Measuring dissident and state behavior: The intranational political interactions (IPI) project. Paper presented at the Workshop on Cross-National Data Collection, Texas A&M University, November 21, http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/∼whmoore/ipi/harmel.conf.pdf.
15.
Davis, D.R., and M.D. Ward.1990. They dance alone: Deaths and the disappeared in contemporary Chile. Journal of Conflict Resolution34(3): 449-475.
16.
Dixon, W.J.1988. The discrete sequential analysis of dynamic international behavior. Quality and Quantity22: 239-54.
17.
Fearon. J. D.1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88(3): 577-592.
18.
Francisco, R.A.1995. The relationship between coercion and protest: An empirical evaluation in three coercive states. Journal of Conflict Resolution39: 263-82.
19.
Francisco, R.A.1996. Coercion and protest: An empirical test in two democratic states. American Journal of Political Science40: 1179-204.
20.
Freeman, J.R.1989. Systematic sampling, temporal aggregation, and the study of political relationships. Political Analysis1: 61-88.
21.
Goldstein, J.S.1992. A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. Journal of Conflict Resolution36: 369-85.
22.
Goldstein, J.S., and J.C. Pevehouse.1997. Reciprocity, bullying, and international cooperation: Time-series analysis of the Bosnia conflict. American Political Science Review91(3): 515- 530.
23.
Gurr, T.R.1970. Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Hibbs, D.A., Jr.1973. Mass political violence. New York: Wiley.
25.
Hirshleifer, J., and J.C.M. Coll.1988. What strategies can support the evolutionary emergence of cooperation?Journal of Conflict Resolution32 (June): 367-98.
26.
Jackson, M., E. Peterson, J. Bull, S. Monsen, and P. Richard.1960. The failure of an incipient social movement . Pacific Sociological Review3 (Spring): 35-40.
27.
Kadera, K.M.2001. The power-conflict story: A dynamic model of interstate rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
Krain, M.2000. Repression and accommodation in post-revolutionary states . New York: St. Martin's.
29.
Lakatos, I.1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave.New York: Cambridge University Press, 91-95.
30.
Lave, C.H., and J.G. March.1975. An introduction to models in the social sciences. New York: Harper and Row .
31.
Lee, C.2001. Protest and repression in Latin America: A synthetic model. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
32.
Leeds, B.A., D.R. Davis, and W.H. Moore with C. McHorney.1996. Intranational Political Interactions (IPI) Codebook. Unpublished manuscript. Tallahassee, FL : Florida State University, Florida. http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/∼whmoore/ipi/codebook.html .
33.
Levi, M.1989. Of rule and revenue. Berkley: University of California Press.
34.
Lichbach, M.I.1984. An economic theory of governability. Public Choice44: 307-37.
35.
Lichbach, M.1987. Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution31: 266-97.
36.
Lichbach, M.I.1995. The rebel's dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Little, D.1991. Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: West View Press.
38.
Marlin-Bennett, R., A. Rosenblatt, and J. Wang.1991. The visible hand: The United States, Japan, and the management of trade disputes. International Interactions17: 191-213.
39.
Moore, W.H.1998. Repression and dissent: Substitution, context, and timing . American Journal of Political Science42(3): 851-873.
40.
Moore, W.H.2000. The repression of dissent: A substitution model of government coercion. Journal of Conflict Resolution44: 107-127.
41.
Moore, W.H., and D.R. Davis.1998. Ties that bind? Domestic and international conflict behavior in Zaire. Comparative Political Studies31: 45-71.
42.
Popkin, S.1979. The rational peasant. San Diego: University of California Press.
43.
Rasler, K.1996. Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review61: 132-52.
44.
Schelling, T.1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton.
45.
Shellman, S.M.2004a. Measuring the intensity of intranational political interactions event data: Two interval-like scales. International Interactions30(2): 109-141.
46.
Shellman, S.M.2004b. Time series intervals and statistical inference: The affects of temporal aggregation on event data analysis. Political Analysis12(1): 97-104.
47.
Snyder, D., and C. Tilly.1972. Hardship and collective violence in France: 1830-1960. American Sociological Review37: 520-532.
48.
Tilly, C.1978. From mobilization to revolution. New York: Random House.
49.
Waltz, K.1995. Realist thought and neorealist theory. In Controversies in international relations theory: Realism and the neoliberal challenge, ed. C. W. Kegley, Jr., 67-82. New York: St. Martin's Press.
50.
Wooldridge, J.M.2000. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Australia: South-Western College Publishing.
51.
Wood, D.1988. Principals, bureaucrats, and responsiveness in clean air enforcements. American Political Science Review82(1): 213-234.
