Elemental analysis is a fundamental method of analysis on archaeological materials to address their overall composition or identify the source of their geological components, yet having access to instrumentation, its often destructive nature, and the time and cost of analyses have limited the number and/or size of archaeological artifacts tested. The development of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) instruments over the past decade, however, has allowed nondestructive analyses to be conducted in museums around the world, on virtually any size artifact, producing data for up to several hundred samples per day. Major issues have been raised, however, about the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of these devices, and the limitation of performing surface analysis on potentially heterogeneous objects. The advantages and limitations of pXRF are discussed here regarding archaeological studies of obsidian, ceramics, metals, bone, and painted materials.
E. Ciliberto, G. Spoto, editors. Modern Analytical Methods in Art and Archaeology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
2.
PollardA.M.BattC.SternB.YoungS.M.M.Analytical Chemistry in Archaeology. , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
3.
A.M. Pollard, C. Heron, editors. Archaeological Chemistry. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2008.
4.
ShackleyM.S.“Is There Reliability and Validity in Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (PXRF)”. The SAA Archaeological Record. 2010. 10(5): 17–20, 44.
5.
FrahmE.DoonanR.C.P.“The Technological Versus Methodological Revolution of Portable XRF in Archaeology”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013. 40: 1425–1434.
6.
SpeakmanR.J.ShackleyM.S.“Silo Science and Portable XRF in Archaeology: a Response to Frahm”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013. 40: 1435–1443.
7.
FrahmE.“Is Obsidian Sourcing about Geochemistry or Archaeology? A Reply to Speakman and Shackley”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013. 40: 1444–1448.
8.
FrahmE.“Validity of “Off-the-Shelf” Handheld Portable XRF for Sourcing Near Eastern Obsidian Chip Debris”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2013. 40: 1080–1092.
9.
FrahmE.“Characterizing Obsidian Sources with Portable XRF: Accuracy, Reproducibility, and Field Relationships in a Case Study from Armenia”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014. 49: 105–125.
10.
C. Alexander, K.A. Brown, I.M. Muntoni, R.H. Tykot. “Archaeometry of Neolithic Tavoliere Ceramics: Preliminary Results of a New Project”. In: A. Gravina, editor. Atti – 34 Convegno Nazionale sulla Preistoria, Protostoria, Storia della Daunia. San Severo, 2013. pp. 131–140.
11.
H. Ashkanani, R.H. Tykot. “Interregional Interaction and Dilmun Power in the Bronze Age: A Provenance Study of Ceramics from Bronze Age Sites in Kuwait, and Bahrain Using Non-destructive pXRF Analysis”. In: R.A. Armitage, J.H. Burton, editors. Archaeological Chemistry VIII. ACS Symposium Series. 2013. 1147: 245–267.
12.
BonomoM.F.LowryJ.P.TykotR.H.GiffordJ.A.“An Exploratory Non-destructive Provenance Analysis of Two Middle Archaic Greenstone Pendants from Little Salt Spring, Florida, USA”. Geoarchaeology. 2014. 29: 121–137.
13.
FreundK.P.TykotR.H.“Lithic Technology and Obsidian Exchange Networks in Bronze Age Nuragic Sardinia (Italy)”. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2011. 3: 151–164.
14.
GliozzoE.ArlettiR.CartechiniL.ImbertiS.KockelmannW.A.RinaldiI.TykotR.H.“Non-invasive Chemical and Phase Analysis of Roman Bronze Artefacts from Thamusida (Morocco)”. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2010. 68: 2246–51.
15.
GliozzoE.KockelmannW.A.BartoliL.TykotR.H.“Roman Bronze Artefacts from Thamusida (Morocco): Chemical and Phase Analyses”. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2011. 269: 277–283.
16.
StremtanC.AshkananiH.TykotR.H.PuscasM.“Constructing a Database for pXRF, XRD, ICP-MS and Petrographic Analyses of Bronze Age Ceramics and Raw Materials from Failaka Island (Kuwait)”. In: ScottR.B.BraekmansD.CarremansM.DegryseP. (eds). Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium for Archaeometry. Leuven, Belgium: Centre for Archaeological Sciences, KU Leuven, 2014, pp. 274–279.
17.
R.H. Tykot. 2010. “Sourcing of Sardinian Obsidian Collections in the Museo Preistorico-Etnografico ‘Luigi Pigorini’ Using Non-destructive Portable XRF”. In: C. Lugliè, editor. L’ossidiana del Monte Arci nel Mediterraneo. Nuovi apporti sulla diffusione, sui sistemi di produzione e sulla loro cronologia. Atti del 5° Convegno internazionale (Pau, Italia, 27–29 Giugno 2008). NUR, Ales. pp. 85–97.
18.
TykotR.H.“Non-destructive Trace Element Analysis of Human Bones to Examine Diet and Mobility”. In: BraekmansD.HoningsJ.DegryseP. (eds). 39th International Symposium on Archaeometry, 28 May–1 June 2012, Leuven, Belgium. Programme and Abstracts. Leuven, Belgium: Centre for Archaeological Sciences, 2012, pp. 308.
19.
R.H. Tykot. “Advantages and Disadvantages of using pXRF in Europe on Ceramics, Metals, Paintings, Stone, and Bone”. 20th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists. Abstracts of the Oral and Poster Presentations, 2014. p. 206.
20.
R.H. Tykot, K.P. Freund, A. Vianello. “Source Analysis of Prehistoric Obsidian Artifacts in Sicily (Italy) Using pXRF”. In: R.A. Armitage, J.H. Burton, editors. Archaeological Chemistry VIII. ACS Symposium Series. 2013. 1147:195–210.
21.
TykotR.H.LaiL.TozziC.“Intra-site Obsidian Subsource Patterns at Contraguda, Sardinia (Italy)”. In: Turbanti-MemmiI. (ed.) Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Siena, Italy, May 13–16, 2008, Siena, Italy. New York, NY: Springer, 2011, pp. 321–328.
22.
R.H. Tykot, N.M. White, J.P. DuVernay, J.S. Freeman, C.T. Hays, M. Koppe, C.N. Hunt, R.A. Weinstein, D.S. Woodward. “Advantages and Disadvantages of pXRF for Archaeological Ceramic Analysis: Prehistoric Pottery Distribution and Trade in NW Florida”. In: R.A. Armitage, J.H. Burton, editors. Archaeological Chemistry VIII. ACS Symposium Series. 2013. 1147: 233–244.
LiritzisI.ZachariasN.“Portable XRF of Archaeological Artifacts: Current Research, Potentials and Limitations”. In: ShackleyM.S. (ed.) X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology. New York, NY: Springer, 2013, pp. 109–142.
25.
GoodaleN.BaileyD.G.JonesG.T.PrescottC.ScholzE.StaglianoN.LewisC.“pXRF: A Study of Inter-instrument Performance”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012. 39: 875–883.
26.
A.N. Shugar, J.L. Mass, editors. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 2012.
NewlanderK.GoodaleN.JonesG.T.BaileyD.G.“Empirical Study of the Effect of Count Time on the Precision and Accuracy of pXRF Data”. J. Archaeol. Sci. Reports. 2015. 3: 534–548.
29.
CraigN.SpeakmanR.J.Popelka-FilcoffR.S.GlascockM.D.David RobertsonJ.ShackleyM.S.AldenderferM.S.“Comparison of XRF and PXRF for Analysis of Archaeological Obsidian from Southern Peru”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007. 34: 2012–2024.
30.
CecilL.G.MoriartyM.D.SpeakmanR.J.GlascockM.D.“Feasibility of Field-portable XRF to Identify Obsidian Sources in Central Peten, Guatemala”. In: GlascockM.D.SpeakmanR.J.Popelka-FilcoffR.S. (eds). Archaeological Chemistry. Analytical Techniques and Archaeological Interpretation. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 506–521.
31.
PhillipsS.C.SpeakmanR.J.“Initial Source Evaluation of Archaeological Obsidian from the Kuril Islands of the Russian Far East Using Portable XRF”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2009. 36: 1256–1263.
32.
NazaroffA.J.PruferK.M.DrakeB.L.“Assessing the Applicability of Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry for Obsidian Provenance Research in the Maya Lowlands”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2010. 37: 885–895.
33.
JiaP.W.DoelmanT.ChenC.ZhaoH.LinS.TorrenceR.GlascockM.D.“Moving Sources: A Preliminary Study of Volcanic Glass Artifact Distributions in Northeast China Using PXRF”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2010. 37: 1670–1677.
34.
BurleyD.V.SheppardP.J.SimoninM.“Tongan and Samoan Volcanic Glass: pXRF Analysis and Implications for Constructs of Ancestral Polynesian Society”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. 38: 2625–2632.
35.
MillhauserJ.K.Rodriguez-AlegriaE.GlascockM.“Testing the Accuracy of Portable X-ray Fluorescence to Study Aztec and Colonial Obsidian Supply at Xaltocan, Mexico”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. 38: 3141–3152.
36.
ForsterN.GraveP.P. “Non-destructive PXRF Analysis of Museum-curated Obsidian from the Near East”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012. 39: 728–736.
37.
WilliamsP.R.DussubieuxL.NashD.J.“Provenance of Peruvian Wari Obsidian: Comparing INAA, LA-ICP-MS, and Portable XRF”. In: LiritzisI.StevensonC.M. (eds). Obsidian and Ancient Manufactured Glasses. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 2012, pp. 75–85.
38.
DyrdahlE.SpeakmanR.J.“Investigating Obsidian Procurement at Integration Period (ca. AD 700–1500) Tola Sites in Highland Northern Ecuador via Portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF)”. In: ArmitageR.A.BurtonJ.H. (eds). Archaeological Chemistry VIII. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2013, pp. 211–232.
39.
RademakerK.GlascockM.KaiserB.GibsonD.LuxD.YatesM.“Multi-technique Geochemical Characterization of the Alxa Obsidian Source, Peruvian Andes”. Geology. 2013. 41: 779–782.
40.
CannJ.R.RenfrewC.“The Characterization of Obsidian and its Application to the Mediterranean Region”. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1964. 30: 111–133.
41.
De FrancescoA.M.CrisciG.M.BocciM.“Non-destructive Analytic Method Using XRF for Determination of Provenance of Archaeological Obsidians from the Mediterranean Area: A Comparison with Traditional XRF Methods”. Archaeometry. 2008. 50: 337–350.
42.
MiličM.“PXRF Characterisation of Obsidian from Central Anatolia, the Aegean and Central Europe”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014. 41: 285–296.
FrahmE.SchmidtB.A.GasparyanB.YeritsyanB.KarapetianS.MeliksetianK.“Ten Seconds in the Field: Rapid Armenian Obsidian Sourcing with Portable XRF to Inform Excavations and Surveys”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014. 41: 333–348.
45.
TykotR.H.“Obsidian Use and Trade in the Adriatic”. In: VisentiniP.PodrugE. (eds). The Adriatic, a Sea Without Borders: Communication Routes of Populations in 6000 BC. Udine, Italy: Civici Musei di Udine, Museo Friulano di Storia Naturale, 2014, pp. 171–181, 224–225.
46.
TykotR.H.“Obsidian Procurement and Distribution in the Central and Western Mediterranean”. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 1996. 9: 39–82.
47.
TykotR.H.“Chemical Fingerprinting and Source-tracing of Obsidian: The Central Mediterranean Trade in Black Gold”. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002. 35: 618–627.
48.
R.H. Tykot, M.R. Iovino, M.C. Martinelli, L. Beyer. “Ossidiana da Lipari: le fonti, la distribuzione, la tipologia e le tracce d'usura”. In: Atti del XXXIX Riunione Scientifica dell’Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria: Materie prime e scambi nella preistoria italiana, Firenze, 25–27 November 2004. Firenze, 2006. pp. 592–597.
49.
TykotR.H.AmmermanA.J.“New Directions in Central Mediterranean Obsidian Studies”. Antiquity. 1997. 71(274): 1000–1006.
50.
TykotR.H.“Obsidian Finds on the Fringes of the Central Mediterranean: Exotic or Eccentric Exchange?”. In: VianelloA. (eds). Exotica in the Prehistoric Mediterranean. Oxford, UK: Oxbow Books, 2011, pp. 33–44.
51.
SpeakmanR.J.LittleN.C.CreelD.MillerM.R.IñañezJ.G.“Sourcing Ceramics with Portable XRF Spectrometers? A Comparison with INAA Using Mimbres Pottery from the American Southwest”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. 38: 3483–3496.
52.
ForsterN.GraveP.VickeryN.KealhoferL.“Non-destructive Analysis Using PXRF: Methodology and Application to Archaeological Ceramics”. X-Ray Spectrom. 2011. 40: 389–398.
53.
BonizzoniL.GalliA.GondolaM.MartiniM.“Comparison Between XRF, TXRF, and PXRF Analyses for Provenance Classification of Archaeological Brick”. X-Ray Spectrom. 2013. 42: 262–267.
54.
JohnsonJ.“Accurate Measurements of Low Z Elements in Sediments and Archaeological Ceramics Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence (PXRF)”. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2014. 21: 563–588.
55.
HuntA.SpeakmanR.J.“Portable XRF Analysis of Archaeological Sediments and Ceramics”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2015. 53: 626–638.
56.
MorgensteinM.RedmountC.A.“Using Portable Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Analysis for On-site Study of Ceramic Sherds at El Hibeh, Egypt”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2005. 32: 1613–1623.
57.
EmeryL.MorgensteinM.“Portable EDXRF Analysis of a Mud Brick Necropolis Enclosure: Evidence of Work Organization, El Hibeh, Middle Egypt”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007. 34: 111–122.
58.
MatsunagaJ.“Using Portable Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluoresence (EDXRF) Spectrometry in the Study of Ceramic Technology at Vinca-Belo Brdo, Serbia”. Society of Archaeological Sciences Bulletin. 2009. 32: 8–12.
59.
GorenY.MommsenH.KlingerJ.“Non-destructive Provenance Study of Cuneiform Tablets Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF)”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011. 38: 684–696.
60.
FrankelD.WebbJ.M.“Pottery Production and Distribution in Prehistoric Bronze Age Cyprus. An Application of pXRF Analysis”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012. 39: 1380–1387.
61.
ForouzanF.GloverJ.B.WilliamsF.DeocampoD.“Portable XRF Analysis of Zoomorphic Figurines, “Tokens”, and Sling Bullets from Chogha Gavaneh, Iran”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2012. 39: 3534–3541.
62.
AimersJ.J.FarthingD.J.ShugarA.N.“Handheld X-ray Analysis of Maya Ceramics: a Pilot Study Presenting Issues Related to Quantification and Calibration”. In: ShugarA.N.MassJ.L. (eds). Studies in Archaeological Sciences. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 2012, pp. 423–449.
63.
KoppeM.Étude de céramiques de la vallée de l'Apalachicola en Floride par spectrométrie portable de fluorescence X. [M.A. Thesis]. , Bordeaux, France: Université Michel de Montaigne Bordeaux 3, 2010.
64.
DuVernayJ.P.The Archaeology of Yon Mound and Village, Middle Apalachicola River Valley, Northwest Florida. [Ph.D. Dissertation]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2011.
65.
WoodwardD.Paleo-Indian to Spanish Occupation around Choctawhatchee Bay, Northwest Florida, as Documented in a Private Artifact Collection. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2012.
66.
TeohM.Craft Specialization and Production Scale: Understanding Figulina Ware in Neolithic Dalmatia. [M.A. Thesis]. , Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, 2012.
67.
PenaJ.Elemental Analysis of Late Horizon Pottery from the Huancabamba Valley, Cajamarca - Peru. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2013.
68.
McCormickD.Exploring Potential Applications of Portable X-ray Fluorescence on Earthen Materials from Southeast Mesoamerica. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2013.
69.
NostromR.V.Portable X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Pottery at the Bayshore Homes site in Pinellas County, Florida. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Tampa, 2014.
70.
McLeodJ.B.Digital Modeling and Non-Destructive Technological Examination of Aboriginal Burial Practices at Picnic Mound 8Hi3, Hillsborough County, Florida. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2014.
71.
AshkananiH.Interregional Interaction and Dilmun Power in the Bronze Age: A Characterization Study of Ceramics from Bronze Age Sites in Kuwait. [Ph.D. Dissertation]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2014.
72.
WoodruffP.Etruscan Trade Networks: Understanding the Significance of Imported Materials at Remote Etruscan Settlements through Trace Element Analysis Using a Non-Destructive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer. [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2014.
73.
PrendergastE.The Archaeology of the McKinnie Site and Collection, Apalachicola Valley, Northwest Florida (8Ja1869). [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2015.
74.
MckendryE.Interpreting Bronze Age Exchange in Sicily through Trace Element Characterization of Ceramics Utilizing Portable X-Ray Fluorescence (pXRF). [M.A. Thesis]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2015.
75.
PironeF.Regional Interaction Spheres and Mobility: An Archaeometric Characterization Study of Ceramics from the Maltese Neolithic to Middle Bronze Age. [Ph.D. Dissertation]. , Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 2016.
76.
McCormickD.R.WellsE.C.“Pottery, People, and pXRF: Toward the Development of Composition Profiles for Southeast Mesoamerican Ceramics”. In: Lopez VarelaS.L. (ed.) Social Dynamics of Ceramic Analysis: New Techniques and Interpretations. Oxford, UK: Archaeopress, 2014, pp. 22–35.
77.
KarydasA.G.“Application of a Portable XRF Spectrometer for the Non-invasive Analysis of Museum Metal Artefacts”. Annali di Chimica. 2007. 97: 419–432.
78.
RoweM.W.ColeS.J.YousufM.“pXRF Analysis of Arsenic When Lead is Present: A Cautionary Tale”. In: ArmitageR.A.BurtonJ.H. (eds). Archaeological Chemistry VIII. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2013, pp. 269–276.
79.
ShugarA.N.“Portable X-ray Fluorescence and Archaeology: Limitations of the Instrument and Suggested Methods to Achieve Desired Results”. In: ArmitageR.A.BurtonJ.H. (eds). Archaeological Chemistry VIII. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2013, pp. 173–195.
80.
DylanS.“Handheld X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Renaissance Bronzes: Practical Approaches to Quantification and Acquisition”. In: ShugarA.N.MassJ.L. (eds). Studies in Archaeological Sciences. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 2012, pp. 37–74.
81.
OrfanouV.RehrenT.“A (not so) Dangerous Method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS Analysis of Copper-based Artefacts”. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2015. 7: 387–397.
82.
CharalambousA.KassianidouV.PapasavvasG.“A Compositional Study of Cypriot Bronzes Dating to the Early Iron Age Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (pXRF)”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014. 46: 205–216.
83.
DussubieuxL.WalkerH.“Identifying American Native and European Smelted Coppers with pXRF: a Case Study of Artifacts from the Upper Great Lakes Region”. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2015. 59: 169–178.
84.
McGlincheyC.“Handheld XRF for the Examination of Paintings: Proper Use and Limitations”. In: ShugarA.N.MassJ.L. (eds). Studies in Archaeological Sciences Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 2012, pp. 131–158.
85.
LiritzisI.PolychroniadouE.“Optical and Analytical Techniques Applied to the Amfissa Cathedral Mural Paintings Made by the Greek Artist Spyros Papaloukas (1892–1957)”. Revue d’ Archaeometrie (Archaeosciences). 2007. 31: 97–112.
86.
TykotR.H.“The Contribution of Isotopic and Elemental Analysis to Understanding the Importance of Maize and Aquatic Foods in the Southeastern United States”. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin. 2013. 56: 72.
87.
TykotR.H.KellyJ.A.MilanichJ.T.“Stable Isotope Analysis and Subsistence Adaptations Along the Gulf Coast of Florida from the Archaic Through Safety Harbor Periods”. Geoarchaeological and Bioarchaeological Studies. 2005. 3: 517–520.
