Policy has direct bearing on occupational therapy practice and is a key dimension of the environment. To date, there has not been a synthesis of how policy is addressed in the occupational therapy literature.
Purpose.
The purpose of this review is to identify and analyze the ways that policy is addressed in the occupational therapy literature.
Method.
We conducted a scoping review of literature on policy and occupational therapy. Articles were analyzed deductively using a policy framework and inductively to identify overarching themes.
Findings.
Sixty-four papers were included for analysis. We present the descriptive information of the included articles according to policy type, sphere of action, stage of policy development, level, and actors. The qualitative analysis uncovered two broad concepts: “awareness” about the relationship between policy and practice and messages pertaining to “action.”
Implications.
There are numerous areas for further research into the policy–occupational therapy nexus, as policy has numerous pathways to shape practice. Practitioners will benefit from better understanding these pathways and actively engaging to align policy with the values of the profession.
*AdamsJ. (1996). Adapting for community care, Part 2. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 185–187. doi:10.1177/030802269605900410
2.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
3.
*BarbaraA.CurtinM. (2008). Gatekeepers or advocates? Occupational therapists and equipment funding schemes. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55, 57–60. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00683.x
4.
BickenbachJ. E.ChatterjiS.BadleyE. M.ÜstünT. B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48, 1173–1187. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00441-9
5.
*BravemanB.MetzlerC. A. (2012). Health care reform implementation and occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 11–14. doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.661001
6.
BrooksS. (1989). Public policy in Canada: An introduction. Toronto, ON: McClelland and Stewart.
7.
CairneyP. (2011). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
CairneyP.KwiatkowskiR. (2017). How to communicate effectively with policymakers: Combine insights from psychology and policy studies. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 37. doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0046-8
9.
CairneyP.OliverK.WellsteadA. (2016). To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty. Public Administration Review, 76, 399–402. doi:10.1111/puar.12555
10.
*CameronA.MastersonA. (1998). The changing policy context of occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 556–560. doi:10.1177/030802269806101207
11.
*CarrJ. (2001). Reform of the Mental Health Act1983: Implications of safety, capacity and compulsion. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 590–594. doi:10.1177/030802260106401203
12.
*CarrierA.LevasseurM.MullinsG. (2010). Accessibility of occupational therapy community services: A legal, ethical, and clinical analysis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24, 360–376. doi:10.3109/07380577.2010.510170
13.
CastilloE. G.ChungB.BromleyE.KataokaS. H.BraslowJ. T.EssockS. M.…WellsK. B. (2018). Community, public policy, and recovery from mental illness: Emerging research and initiatives. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 26, 70–81. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000178
14.
*ChanK. K. (2008). Policy and practice of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong and Guangzhou: A comparative study. Work, 30(1), 11–16.
15.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
*CusackL.Sealey-LapesC. (2000). Clinical governance and user involvement. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 539–546. doi:10.1177/030802260006301107
17.
DyeT. R. (1972). Understanding public policy (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Espín-TelloS. M.ColverA. (2017). How available to European children and young people with cerebral palsy are features of their environment that they need?Research in Developmental Disabilities, 71, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.018
19.
*EvertssonL.LindqvistR. (2005). Welfare state and women’s work: The professional projects of nurses and occupational therapists in Sweden. Nursing Inquiry, 12, 256–268. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1800.2005.00289.x
20.
*FisherG.FriesemaJ. (2013). Implications of the affordable care act for occupational therapy practitioners providing services to Medicare recipients. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 502–506. doi:10.1071/PY08065
21.
GerlachA. J.TeachmanG.Laliberte-RudmanD.AldrichR. M.HuotS. (2018). Expanding beyond individualism: Engaging critical perspectives on occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 35–43. doi:10.1080/11038128.2017.1327616
22.
*GillJ.MacleanF.RentonL.O’MayF. (2011). Occupational therapy graduates of 2009: Knowledge and attitudes relating to their role in the area of alcohol misuse. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 168–175. doi:10.4276/030802211X13021048723174
23.
GitlowL.FleckyK. (2005). Integrating disability studies concepts into occupational therapy education using service learning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 546–553. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.5.546
24.
*GoddardT. (2005). Expanding the community role for occupational therapy: Becoming political in the corporate sector. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 225–230. doi:10.5014/ajot.59.2.225
25.
*GodfreyA. (2000). Policy changes in the National Health Service: Implications and opportunities for occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 218–224. doi:10.1177/030802260006300506
26.
GolbersteinE.GonzalesG. (2015). The effects of Medicaid eligibility on mental health services and out-of-pocket spending for mental health services. Health Services Research Journal, 50, 1734–1750. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12399
27.
*HammelJ.MagasiS.MirzaM. P.PreissnerK.Peterson, et al. (2015). A scholarship of practice revisited: Creating community-engaged occupational therapy practitioners, educators and scholars. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(4), 352–369.
28.
*HeijbelB.JosephsonM.JensenI.VingårdE. (2005). Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: Policy implications. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15, 167–176. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-1216-x
29.
*HildenbrandW. C.LambA. J. (2013). Occupational therapy in prevention and wellness: Retaining relevance in a new health care world. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 266–271. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.673001
30.
HouW. H.LiangH. W.SheuC. F.HsiehC. L.ChuangH. Y. (2013). Return to work and quality of life in workers with traumatic limb injuries: A 2-year repeated-measurements study. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 703–710. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.033
*JongbloedL. (1998). Disability income: The experiences of women with multiple sclerosis. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 193–201. doi:10.1177/000841749806500404
33.
KeyworthC.EptonT.GoldthorpeJ.CalamR.ArmitageC. J. (2018). Are healthcare professionals delivering opportunistic behaviour change interventions? A multi-professional survey of engagement with public health policy. Implementation Science, 13(1), Article122. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0814-x
34.
KingdonJ. (2010). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York, NY: Pearson Press.
35.
KinsellaE. A.WhitefordG. E. (2009). Knowledge generation and utilisation in occupational therapy: Towards epistemic reflexivity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 56, 249–258. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00726.x
36.
*KwokH. K. H.SzetoG. P. Y.ChengA. S. K.SiuH.ChanC. C. H. (2011). Occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong: Current status and future needs. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, S28–S34. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9286-4
37.
LagardeM.PalmerN. (2008). The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: How strong is the evidence?Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(11), 839–848. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.049197
38.
*LambA. J.MetzlerC. A. (2014). Defining the value of occupational therapy: A health policy lens on research and practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68, 9–14. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.681001
39.
LewisJ. M. (2006). Being around and knowing the players: Networks of influence in health policy. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2125–2136. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.004
40.
*LloydC.KanowskiH.MaasF. (1999). Occupational therapy in mental health: Challenges and opportunities. Occupational Therapy International, 6, 110–125. doi:10.1177/030802269906201106
41.
*LohmanH.GabrielL.FurlongB. (2004). The bridge from ethics to public policy: Implications for occupational therapy practitioners. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 109–112. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.1.109
42.
*MackeyH. (2014). Living tensions: Reconstructing notions of professionalism in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61, 168–176. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12097
43.
*MagasiS. (2012). Negotiating the social service systems: A vital yet frequently invisible occupation. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32, S25–S33. doi:10.3928/15394492-20110906-03
44.
MarchildonG. P.SchrijversK. (2011). Physician resistance and the forging of public healthcare: A comparative analysis of the doctors’ strikes in Canada and Belgium in the 1960s. Medical History, 55, 203–222. doi:10.1017/S0025727300005767
45.
MetzlerC.TomlinsonJ.NanofT.HitchonJ. (2012). What is essential in the essential health benefits? And will occupational therapy benefit?. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 389–394.
46.
MorganB.YeungK. (2007). An introduction to law and regulation: Text and materials. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801112
47.
MuellmannS.SteenbockB.De CockerK.De CraemerM.HayesC.O’SheaM. P.…PischkeC. R. (2017). Views of policy makers and health promotion professionals on factors facilitating implementation and maintenance of interventions and policies promoting physical activity and healthy eating: results of the DEDIPAC project. BMC Public Health, 17, Article932. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4929-9.
48.
MurphyA. D.GriffithV. M.BerkeridgeT.MrozT. M.JirikowicT. L. (2017). Primary care for underserved populations: Navigating policy to incorporate occupational therapy into federally qualified health centers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 1–5. doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.712001
49.
*OliverM. (1986). Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. Disability & Society, 1(1), 5–17. doi:10.1080/02674648666780021
50.
PereiraR. B.WhitefordG. E. (2013). Understanding social inclusion as an international discourse: Implications for enabling participation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 112–115. doi:10.4276/030802213X13603244419392
51.
PhelanS. K. (2011). Constructions of disability: A call for critical reflexivity in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 164–172. doi:10.2182/cjot.2011.78.3.4
52.
PolatajkoH. J.DavisJ.StewartD.CantinN.AmorosoB.PurdieL.ZimmermanD. (2013). Specifying the domain of concern: Occupation as core. In TownsendE. A.PolatajkoH. J., Enabling occupation II: Advancing a Canadian occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, & justice through occupation (2nd ed., pp. 13–36). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
53.
*QuickL.HarmanS.MorganS.StagnittiK. (2010). Scope of practice of occupational therapists working in Victorian community health settings. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 57, 95–101. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00827.x
54.
*RandallG. (2007). The reform of home care services in Ontario: Opportunity lost or lesson learned?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 208–216. doi:10.1177/000841740707400309
55.
RestallG.GerlachA.ValavaaraK.PhenixA. (2016). The truth and reconciliation commission’s calls to action: How will occupational therapists respond?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83, 264–268. doi:10.1177/0008417416678850
56.
RivardA.HollisV.DarrahJ.MadillH. M.WarrenS. (2005). Therapists’ perspectives on the management and delivery of occupational therapy and physical therapy services. Healthcare Management Forum, 18(2), 9–13. doi:10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60348-1
57.
RossinM. (2011). The effects of maternity leave on children’s birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. Journal of Health Economics, 30, 221–239. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
58.
RoyL.ValléeC.KirshB. H.MarshallC. A.MarvalR.LowA. (2017). Occupation-based practices and homelessness: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84, 98–110. doi:10.1177/0008417416688709
59.
*RoyeenC. B.DuncanM.CrabtreeJ.RichardsJ.ClarkG. F. (2000). Effects of billing Medicaid for occupational therapy services in the schools: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 429–433. doi:10.5014/ajot.54.4.429
60.
SchurL.HanK.KimA.AmeriM.BlanckP.KruseD. (2017). Disability at work: A look back and forward. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27, 482–497. doi:10.1007/s10926-017-9739-5
61.
Shikako-ThomasK.LawM. (2015). Policies supporting participation in leisure activities for children and youth with disabilities in Canada: From policy to play. Disability & Society, 30, 381–400. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12117
62.
Shikako-ThomasK.ShevellM. (2018). Promoting human rights of children with neurologic conditions. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 27, 53–61. doi:10.1016/j.spen.2018.03.007
63.
*ThomesenM. (1996). The resource utilization groups system of nursing home reimbursement policies: Influences on occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 790–797. doi:10.5014/ajot.50.10.790
64.
*von ZweckC. (2004). Understanding our context for occupational therapy practice: A key to strategies for future success. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 5–8.
65.
*VrkljanB. H. (2005). Dispelling the disability stereotype: Embracing a universalistic perspective of disablement. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72, 57–60. doi:10.1177/000841740507200111
66.
*WalkerK. F. (2001). Adjustments to managed health care: Pushing against it, going with it, and making the best of it. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 129–137. doi:10.5014/ajot.55.2.129
67.
WaltG.GilsonL. (1994). Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 9, 353–370.
68.
WatsonD. E.McGrailK. M. (2009). More doctors or better care?Healthcare Policy, 5(1),26.
69.
*WhiteE.HampsonH.GardinerL.MotionN.BroomhallK. (2013). A review of occupational therapy research and development activity in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 2–8. doi:10.4276/030802213X13576469254577
70.
WilliamsE.MasekoL.BuchananH. (2017). Rehabilitation: Strengthening advocacy for change. It’s time to act [Editorial]. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 2. doi:10.17159/2310-3833/2017/v47n3a1
71.
WilsonV.AndrewA.WilsonL. H. (2012). Health promotion: Future occupational therapy in an aging New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 36–38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
