Tsebelis’ veto players theory predicts that legislative veto players constrain the executive’s political decisions because their approval is needed to implement policy change. This study extends the veto players argument into international conflict literature, specifically in regard to legislative constraints emanating from the number of legislative veto players, their policy preferences, and their internal cohesion. A cross-sectional, time-series dyadic data analysis shows that, in general, an increase of legislative constraints notably reduces the likelihood of the onset of militarized interstate disputes. However, while legislative constraints in democratic and mixed dyads are likely to discourage democratic executives’ use of force, those in autocratic dyads do not produce effective pacifying effects.
Adcock, Robert, and David Collier.2001. Measurement validity. American Political Science Review95 (3): 529-46.
2.
Andreski, Stanislav.1992. Wars, revolutions, dictatorships. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
3.
Bebler, Anton.1987. Conflict resolution between socialist states. Journal of Peace Research24 (1): 31-46.
4.
Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker.1998. Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science42 (4): 1260-88.
5.
Beck, Thorsten, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh.2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review15 (1): 165-76.
6.
Belsley, D.A., E. Kuh, and R.E. Welsch.1980. Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow .2003. The logic of political survival . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
8.
Choi, Seung-Whan. Forthcoming. Beyond Kantian liberalism: Peace through globalization?Conflict Management and Peace Science.
9.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James.2003. No professional soldiers, no militarized interstate disputes?A new question for neo-Kantianism. Journal of Conflict Resolution47 (6): 796-816.
10.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James.2004. Civil-military relations in a neo-Kantian world, 1886-1992. Armed Forces & Society30 (2): 227-54.
11.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James.2005. Civil-military dynamics, democracy, and international conflict: A new quest for international peace. New York: Palgrave.
12.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James.2007. Media openness, democracy, and militarized interstate disputes. British Journal of Political Science37 (1): 23-46.
13.
Choi, Seung-Whan, and Patrick James.2008. Civil-military structure, political communication, and the democratic peace. Journal of Peace Research45 (1): 37-53.
14.
Clarke, Kevin A., and Randall W. Stone .2008. Democracy and the logic of political survival. American Political Science Review102 (3): 387-92.
15.
Diamond, Larry.1999. Developing democracy. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Dixon, William J.1994. Democracy and the peaceful settlement of international conflict. American Political Science Review88 (1): 14-32.
17.
Doyle, Michael W.2000. A more perfect union?Review of International Studies26 (5): 81-94.
18.
Fearon, James D.1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review88 (3): 577-92.
19.
Fisher, Louis.2004. Presidential war power. 2nd ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas .
20.
Fisher, Louis.2007. Exercising congress’s constitutional power to end a war. Statement before the senate committee on the judiciary. January 30. http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/fisher1.html .
21.
Gantham, Cliff, and Bruce George.1988. The influence of the British parliament on foreign policy. In Foreign policy and legislatures: An analysis of seven parliaments, ed. Manohar L. Sondhi , 8-33. New Delhi: Abhinav.
22.
Geddes, Barbara.1999. The effect of regime type on authoritarian breakdown . Paper presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA .
23.
Geddes, Barbara.2003. Paradigms and sand castles. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
24.
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Michael D. Ward .1997. Double take. Journal of Conflict Resolution41 (3): 361-83.
25.
Gochman, Charles S., and Zeev Maoz.1984. Military interstate disputes, 1816-1976 . Journal of Conflict Resolution28 (4): 585-615.
26.
Green, Donald P., Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon .2001. Dirty pool. International Organization55 (2): 441-68.
27.
Gujarati, Damodar N.2003. Basic econometrics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Gurr, Ted Robert.1989. Polity II: Political structures and regime change, 1800-1986 [Computer file]. Boulder, CO: Center for Comparative Politics [producer] . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1990.
29.
Gurr, Ted Robert, Keith Jaggers, and Will H. Moore .1991. The transformation of the Western state. In On measuring democracy: Its consequences and concomitants, ed. Alex Inkeles, 69-104. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
30.
Hague, William.2007. The seal of approval. May 15. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/15/thesealofapproval.
31.
Henisz, Witold J.2000. The institutional environment for economic growth . Economics and Politics12 (1): 1-43.
32.
House of Lords Constitution Committee.2006 . Waging war. London: Stationary Office Limited.
33.
Howell, William G., and Jon C. Pevehouse .2005. Presidents, congress, and the use of force. International Organization59 (1): 209-32.
34.
Howell, William G., and Jon C. Pevehouse .2007. While dangers gather. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
35.
Howell, William G., Jon C. Pevehouse, and Douglas Kriner.2007. Responding to "opportunities" to use military force. In While dangers gather: Congressional checks on presidential war powers, ed. William G Howell and Jon C. Pevehouse, 75-113. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Huth, Paul K., and Todd L. Allee .2002. The democratic peace and territorial conflict in the twentieth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
James, Patrick, Johann Park, and Seung-Whan Choi .2006. Democracy and conflict management: Territorial issue claims in the Western hemisphere revisited. International Studies Quarterly50 (4): 803-17.
38.
James, Patrick, Eric Solberg, and Murray Wolfson.1999. An identified systemic model of the democracy-peace nexus. Defence and Peace Economics10 (1): 1-37.
39.
Jones, Daniel M., Stuart A. Bremer, and J. David Singer .1996. Militarized interstate disputes, 1816-1992. Conflict Management and Peace Science15 (2): 163-213.
40.
Keefer, Philip and David Stasavage.2003. The limits of delegation: Veto players, central bank independence and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review97 (3): 407-23.
41.
King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba.1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
42.
Leblang, David, and Steve Chan.2003. Explaining wars fought by established democracies. Political Research Quarterly56 (4): 385-400.
43.
Li, Quan.2005. Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents? Journal of Conflict Resolution49 (2): 278-97.
44.
Linz, Juan J., and H. E. Chehabi, eds. 1998. Sultanistic regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press .
45.
MacIntyre, Andrew.2003. The power of institutions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
46.
Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Jon C. Pevehouse .2005. Democracy, veto players, and the depth of regional integration. Paper presented at the Kellogg Institute for International Studies conference, Notre Dame, IN.
47.
Mansfield, Edward D., Helen V. Milner, and Jon C. Pevehouse .2007. Vetoing co-operation. British Journal of Political Science37 (3): 403-32.
48.
McSmith, Andy.2005. Short tries to give MPs power to veto war plans . October 21. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/short-tries-to-give-mps-power-to-veto-war-plans-511869.html .
49.
Miller, Ross A.1995. Democratic structures and the diversionary use of force . American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 760-85.
50.
Milner, Helen V.1997. Interests, institutions, and information. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
51.
Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de.1748/1977. The spirit of laws, ed. David Wallace Carrithers.Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
Munck, Gerardo, and Jay Verkuilen .2002. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy. Comparative Political Studies35 (1): 5-34.
53.
Oneal, John R., and Bruce Russett.2005. Rule of three, let it be?Conflict Management and Peace Science22 (4): 293-310.
54.
Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett, and Michael Berbaum .2003. Causes of peace. International Studies Quarterly47 (3): 371-93.
55.
Peceny, Mark, Caroline C. Beer, and Shannon Sanchez-Terry .2002. Dictatorial peace?American Political Science Review96 (1): 15-26.
56.
Prins, Brandon C., and Christopher Sprecher .1999. Institutional constraints, political opposition, and interstate dispute escalation. Journal of Peace Research36 (3): 271-87.
57.
Raknerud, Arvid, and Håvard Hegre .1997. The hazard of war. Journal of Peace Research34 (4): 385-404.
58.
Rosato, Sebastian.2003. The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. American Political Science Review97 (4): 585-602.
59.
Roubini, Nouriel, and Jeffrey Sachs.1989. Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review33 (5): 903-33.
60.
Rudman, Mara, and Denis McDonough .2007. Congressional war powers . March 7. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/03/war_powers_options.html .
61.
Russett, Bruce.1993. Grasping the democratic peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
Russett, Bruce, and John R. Oneal .2001. Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York : Norton.
63.
Sarkees, Meredith Reid.2000. The correlates of war data on war. Conflict Management and Peace Science18 (1): 123-44.
64.
Schultz, Kenneth A.1998. Domestic opposition and signaling in international crises . American Political Science Review92 (4): 829-44.
65.
Snow, Donald M.1998. National security. New York : St. Martin’s.
66.
Tsebelis, George.1995. Decision making in political systems. British Journal of Political Science25 (3): 289-325.
67.
Tsebelis, George.1999. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies . American Political Science Review93 (3): 591-608.
68.
Tsebelis, George.2002. Veto players. New York: Russell Sage and Princeton University Press.
69.
Tomz, Michael.2007. Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach. International Organization61 (4): 821-40.
70.
U.K. Parliament.2006. PN231106Const . November 7. http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/lords_press_notices/pn231106const.cfm.
71.
Zorn, Christopher J. W.2001. Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data. American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 470-90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
