Managers often use popular events, such as the Olympics, to advertise their brands more heavily. Can manufacturers and retailers capitalize on these events to enhance the response to their price promotions? This study empirically examines whether the sales response to price promotions is stronger or weaker around events than at nonevent times, and what factors drive this relative promotion response. Studying 242 brands from 30 consumer packaged goods categories in the Netherlands over more than four years, the authors find that a price promotion offered around a popular event often generates a stronger sales response than the same promotion at nonevent times, with a price promotion elasticity that is 9.3% larger, on average, during events. Still, the variance in relative promotion response across brands and events is high, and the authors identify several drivers that managers should consider before shifting promotions toward event times. Currently, managers often do not take these drivers into account. This study provides guidelines to improve promotional timing decisions in relation to popular events.
AakerDavid A.KellerKevin L. (1990), “Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 27–41.
2.
AilawadiKusum L.GedenkKarenLangerTobiasMaYuNeslinScott A. (2014), “Consumer Response to Uncertain Promotions: An Empirical Analysis of Conditional Rebates,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (1), 94–106.
3.
AilawadiKusum L.HarlamBari A.CésarJacquesTrounceDavid (2006), “Promotion Profitability for a Retailer: The Role of Promotion, Brand, Category, and Store Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 518–35.
4.
AilawadiKusum L.NeslinScott A.LehmannDonald R. (2003), “Revenue Premium as an Outcome Measure of Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (4), 1–17.
5.
AndersonEric T.SongInseong (2004), “Coordinating Price Reductions and Coupon Events,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (4), 411–22.
6.
AndrewsRick L.CurrimImran S.LeeflangPeterLimJooseop (2008), “Estimating the SCAN*PRO Model of Store Sales: HB, FM or Just OLS?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25 (1), 22–33.
7.
BalCharlesQuesterPascalePlewaCarolin (2009), “Event-Related Emotions: A Key Metric to Assess Sponsorship Effectiveness,” Journal of Sponsorship, 2 (4), 367–78.
8.
BellDavid R.ChiangJeongwenPadmanabhanV. (1999), “The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization,” Marketing Science, 18 (4), 504–26.
9.
BhatSobodhReddySrinivas K. (2001), “The Impact of Parent Brand Attribute Associations and Affect on Brand Extension Evaluation,” Journal of Business Research, 53 (3), 111–22.
10.
BijmoltTammo H.A.van HeerdeHarald J.PietersRik G.M. (2005), “New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (2), 141–56.
11.
BrykAnthony S.RaudenbushStephen W. (1992), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
12.
BucklinRandolph E.LattinJames M. (1992), “A Model of Product Category Competition Among Grocery Retailers,” Journal of Retailing, 68 (3), 271–93.
13.
BurkeRaymond R.SrullThomas K. (1988), “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 55–68.
ChevalierJudith A.KashyapAnil K.RossiPeter E. (2003), “Why Don’t Prices Rise During Periods of Peak Demand? Evidence from Scanner Data,” American Economic Review, 93 (1), 15–37.
16.
CornwellT. BettinaPruittStephen W.ClarkJohn M. (2005), “The Relationship Between Major-League Sports’ Official Sponsorship Announcements and the Stock Prices of Sponsoring Firms,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (4), 401–12.
17.
DanaherPeter J.BonfrerAndréDharSanjay (2008), “The Effect of Competitive Advertising Interference on Sales for Packaged Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (2), 211–25.
18.
DattaHannesAilawadiKusum L.van HeerdeHarald J. (2017), “How Well Does Consumer-Based Brand Equity Align with Sales-Based Brand Equity and Marketing Mix Response?” Journal of Marketing, 81 (3), 1–20.
19.
DekimpeMarnik G.HanssensDominique M.NijsVincent R.SteenkampJan-Benedict E.M. (2005), “Measuring Short- and Long-Run Promotional Effectiveness on Scanner Data Using Persistence Modelling,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21 (4/5), 409–16.
DoylePeterSaundersJohn (1985), “The Lead Effect of Marketing Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (1), 54–65.
22.
EastlickMary A.FeinbergRichardTrappeyCharles (1993), “Information Overload in Mail Catalog Shopping,” Journal of Direct Marketing, 7 (4), 14–19.
23.
EdmundsAngelaMorrisAnne (2000), “The Problem of Information Overload in Business Organizations: A Review of the Literature,” International Journal of Information Management, 20 (1), 17–28.
24.
EscalasJennifer EdsonMooreMarian ChapmanEdell BrittonJulie (2004), “Fishing for Feelings? Hooking Viewers Helps,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1/2), 105–14.
25.
FreimerMarshallHorskyDan (2008), “Try It, You Will Like It—Does Consumer Learning Lead to Competitive Price Promotions?” Marketing Science, 27 (5), 796–810.
26.
GijsenbergMaarten J. (2014a), “Comment: Measuring Marketing Effectiveness Around Major Sports Events: A Comparison of Two Studies and a Call for Action,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (1), 30–32.
27.
GijsenbergMaarten J. (2014b), “Going for Gold: Investigating the (Non)Sense of Increased Advertising Around Major Sports Events,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (1), 2–15.
28.
GuytJonne Y.GijsbrechtsEls (2014), “Take Turns or March in Sync? The Impact of the National Brand Promotion Calendar on Manufacturer and Retailer Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (6), 753–72.
29.
HochStephen J.DrèzeXavierPurkMary E. (1994), “EDLP, Hi-Lo, and Margin Arithmetic,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 16–27.
30.
JacobyJacob (1984), “Perspectives on Information Overload,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (4), 432–35.
31.
JedidiKamelMelaCarl F.GuptaSunil (1999), “Managing Advertising and Promotion for Long-Run Profitability,” Marketing Science, 18 (1), 1–22.
32.
KaminsMichael A.GuptaKamal (1994), “Congruence Between Spokesperson and Product Type: A Matchup Hypothesis Perspective,” Psychology & Marketing, 11 (6), 569–86.
33.
KellerKevin L. (2003), “Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4), 595–600.
34.
KentRobert J.AllenChris T. (1993), “Does Competitive Clutter in Television Advertising ‘Interfere’ with the Recall and Recognition of Brand Names and Ad Claims?” Marketing Letters, 4 (2), 175–84.
35.
KopallePraveen K.MelaCarl F.MarshLawrence (1999), “The Dynamic Effect of Discounting on Sales: Empirical Analysis and Normative Pricing Implications,” Marketing Science, 18 (3), 317–32.
36.
KumarAnand (2000), “Interference Effects of Contextual Cues in Advertisements on Memory for Ad Content,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9 (3), 155–66.
37.
KumarAnandKrishnanShanker (2004), “Memory Interference in Advertising: A Replication and Extension,” Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (4), 602–11.
38.
LeeflangPeter S.H.WittinkDick R. (1996), “Competitive Reaction Versus Consumer Response: Do Managers Overreact?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13 (2), 103–19.
39.
MacDonaldJames M. (2000), “Demand, Information, and Competition: Why Do Food Prices Fall at Seasonal Demand Peaks?” Journal of Industrial Economics, 48 (1), 27–45.
40.
MacéSandrineNeslinScott A. (2004), “The Determinants of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips in Sales of Frequently Purchased Goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (3), 339–50.
41.
MazodierMarcQuesterPascale (2014), “The Role of Sponsorship Fit for Changing Brand Affect: A Latent Growth Modeling Approach,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (1), 16–29.
42.
McKelveySteveMcDonaldMarkCramerRobert (2005), “MasterCard and Major League Baseball: Metrics for Evaluating a Most ‘Memorable’ Promotion,” Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14 (4), 253–61.
43.
MehtaNitinMaYu (2012), “A Multicategory Model of Consumers’ Purchase Incidence, Quantity, and Brand Choice Decisions: Methodological Issues and Implications on Promotional Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (4), 435–51.
MorrisJon D.WooChongmooGeasonJames A.KimJooyoung (2002), “The Power of Affect: Predicting Intention,” Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (3), 7–17.
46.
MulhernFrancis J.LeoneRobert P. (1991), “Implicit Price Bundling of Retail Products: A Multiproduct Approach to Maximizing Store Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), 63–76.
47.
NaikPrasad A.RamanKalyanWinerRussell S. (2005), “Planning Marketing-Mix Strategies in the Presence of Interaction Effects,” Marketing Science, 24 (1), 25–34.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016), “OECD Composite Leading Indicators: Turning Points of Reference Series and Component Series,” research report (May), http://www.oecd.org/std/leading-indicators/.
50.
ParkSunghoGuptaSachin (2012), “Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas,” Marketing Science, 31 (4), 567–86.
51.
PauwelsKoen (2007), “How Retailer and Competitor Decisions Drive the Long-Term Effectiveness of Manufacturer Promotions for Fast Moving Consumer Goods,” Journal of Retailing, 83 (3), 297–308.
52.
PoieszTheo B.C.VerhallenTheo M.M. (1989), “Brand Confusion in Advertising,” International Journal of Advertising, 8 (3), 231–44.
53.
PracejusJohn W.Douglas OlsenG. (2004), “The Role of Brand/Cause Fit in the Effectiveness of Cause-Related Marketing Campaigns,” Journal of Business Research, 57 (6), 635–40.
54.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S. (2002), Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
55.
RiebeEricaDawesJohn (2006), “Recall of Radio Advertising in Low and High Advertising Clutter Formats,” International Journal of Advertising, 25 (1), 71–86.
56.
SchickAllen G.GordonLawrence A.HakaSusan (1990), “Information Overload: A Temporal Approach,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15 (3), 199–220.
57.
SethuramanRajTellisGerard J.BrieschRichard A. (2011), “How Well Does Advertising Work? Generalizations from Meta-Analysis of Brand Advertising Elasticities,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (3), 457–71.
58.
SotgiuFrancescaGielensKatrijn (2015), “Suppliers Caught in Supermarket Price Wars: Victims or Victors? Insights from a Dutch Price War,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (6), 784–800.
59.
SpeedRichardThompsonPeter (2000), “Determinants of Sports Sponsorship Response,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 227–38.
60.
TellisGerard J.ZufrydenFred S. (1995), “Tackling the Retailer Decision Maze: Which Brands to Discount, How Much, When and Why?” Marketing Science, 14 (3), 271–99.
61.
Van HeerdeHarald J.LeeflangPeter S.H.WittinkDick R. (2000), “The Estimation of Pre- and Postpromotion Dips with Store-Level Scanner Data,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (3), 383–95.
62.
Van HeerdeHarald J.LeeflangPeter S.H.WittinkDick R. (2004), “Decomposing the Sales Promotion Bump with Store Data,” Marketing Science, 23 (3), 317–34.
63.
Van LinArjenGijsbrechtsEls (2016), “The Battle for Health and Beauty: What Drives Supermarket and Drugstore Category-Promotion Lifts?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33 (3), 557–77.
64.
WarnerElizabeth J.BarskyRobert B. (1995), “The Timing and Magnitude of Retail Store Markdowns: Evidence from Weekends and Holidays,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (2), 321–52.
65.
WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2010), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
YelkurRamaTomkovickChuckTraczykPatty (2004), “Super Bowl Advertising Effectiveness: Hollywood Finds the Games Golden,” Journal of Advertising Research, 44 (1), 143–59.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
