Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Student and teacher perceptions regarding composition instruction were investigated using case study techniques in two high school music programs: a general music program providing accelerated instruction to gifted musicians in small classes and a typical performance-based band program. Students in both programs participated in a composition instruction program. Qualitative data included student and teacher interviews, observation, and participant journals. Quantitative data included administration of a composition attitude survey and assessment of student compositions. Analysis of band director perceptions revealed themes identifying challenges to implementing composition instruction: performance culture traditions, time, class setting, teacher preparation, and lack of student fundamental musical knowledge. Teachers in both programs identified benefits as development of student potential, importance of exposure to composition, and increased musical understanding. In the band program, student attitude toward composition increased significantly from pre- to post-instruction, while the general music students, with previous composition experience, showed no change in attitude. Students from both programs identified time as a challenge to composition and also indicated frustration in their lack of fundamental music knowledge. Students identified enjoyment, improved musical understanding, personal expression, increased interest in music, and understanding composition process as benefits to composition experience.

Keywords

music composition creativity high school music education curricula

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amabile

T. M.

(1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Bangs

R. L.

(1992). An application of Amabile’s model of creativity to music instruction: A comparison of motivational strategies (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9239649).

Barrett

M. S.

(2003). Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In Hickey

(Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education (pp. 3–27). Reston, VA: MENC.

Burnard

Younker

B. A.

(2002). Mapping pathways: Fostering creativity in composition. Music Education Research, 4(2), 245–261. doi:10.1080/1461380022000011948

Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). National standards for arts education: What every young American should know and be able to do in the arts. Reston, VA: MENC.

Contemporary Music Project for Creativity in Music Education. (1971). Comprehensive musicianship: An anthology of evolving thought. Washington, DC: Music Educators National Conference.

Eberle

(1996). Scamper: Games for imagination development. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Gorder

W. D.

(1980). Divergent production abilities as constructs of musical creativity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 34–42.

Guilford

J. P.

(1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

10.

Hickey

(1995). Qualitative and quantitative relationships between children’s creative musical thinking processes and products (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9614754)

11.

Hickey

(1997). Teaching ensembles to compose and improvise. Music Educators Journal, 83(6), 17–21. doi:10.2307/3399019

12.

Hickey

(2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234–244. doi:10.2307/3345709

13.

Hickey

(2002). Creativity research in music, visual art, theater, and dance. In Colwell

Richardson

(Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 398–415). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

14.

Kennedy

M. A.

(2002). Listening to the music: Compositional processes of high school composers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 94–110. doi:10.2307/3345709

15.

Kratus

(1989). A time analysis of the compositional processes used by children ages 7 to 11. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 5–20. doi:10.2307/3344949

16.

Mark

M. L.

Gary

C. L.

(2007). A history of American music education (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

17.

Menard

(2009). An investigation of creative potential in high school musicians: Recognizing, promoting, and assessing creative ability through music composition (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3451495)

18.

National Association for Music Education. (2002). Composing and arranging: Standard four benchmarks ( Rinehart

, Ed.). Reston, VA: MENC.

19.

Paynter

(1982). Music in the secondary school curriculum: Trends and developments in class music teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Reimer

(2003). A philosophy of music education: Advancing the vision (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

21.

Sheskin

D. J.

(2007). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (4th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

22.

Smith

J. P.

(2004). Music compositions of upper elementary students created under various conditions of structure (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3132610)

23.

Stauffer

S. L.

(2002). Connections between the musical and life experiences of young composers and their compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 301–322. doi:10.2307/3345357

24.

Strand

(2006). Survey of Indiana music teachers on using composition in the classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 154–167. doi:10.1177/002242940605400206

25.

Thomas

R. B.

(1970). Manhattanville music curriculum program: Final report. Purchase, NY: Manhattanville College of the Sacred Heart.

26.

Vaughan

M. M.

(1971). Music as model and metaphor in the cultivation and measurement of creative behavior in children (Order No. 7211056). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (302458092)

27.

Webster

P. R.

(1977). A factor of intellect approach to creative thinking in music (Order No. 7726619). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (302823201)

28.

Webster

P. R.

(1994). Measure of creative thinking in music-II (MCTM-II). Administrative guidelines. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

29.

Webster

P. R.

Hickey

(1995). Rating scales and their use in assessing children’s compositions. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 6(4), 28–44.

30.

Wehr-Flowers

(2006). Differences between male and female students’ confidence, anxiety and attitude toward learning jazz improvisation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 337–349. doi.10.1177/002242940605400406

31.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

4.94 MB

0.76 MB

5.18 MB

0.32 MB

0.00 MB

10.05 MB

6.12 MB

0.31 MB

8.76 MB

6.01 MB