In this study, we investigated the influence of musical ensemble members’ personality traits on their identification with their ensemble. We recruited a sample of 1,831 students from 52 university ensembles in China. Participants completed the Big Five personality inventory and an ensemble identification scale. Utilizing a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to account for the nested structure of individuals within ensembles, our analysis unveiled the impact of personality traits on ensemble identification at both individual and group levels. Key findings indicated that individuals with higher Agreeableness and lower Openness tended to more strongly identify with the ensemble. Furthermore, ensembles characterized by a majority of members with high Conscientiousness and high Neuroticism were likely to demonstrate stronger overall group-level ensemble identification. The implications of individual differences in personality traits and the composition of personalities within groups for shaping ensemble identification are discussed.
AllportG. W.OdbertH. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
2.
ArceM. A.ChanW. Y.SwartoutK. M.LatzmanR. D. (2022). Exploring the contribution of racially based harassment and personality to variation in native and American identity in immigrant-origin youth. Self and Identity, 21(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2020.1830164
BenedekM.BorovnjakB.NeubauerA. C.Kruse-WeberS. (2014). Creativity and personality in classical, jazz and folk musicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 63(100), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.064
5.
BishopL.González SánchezV.LaengB.JenseniusA. R.HøffdingS. (2021). Move like everyone is watching: Social context affects head motion and gaze in string quartet performance. Journal of New Music Research, 50(4), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2021.1977338
6.
BizumicB.ReynoldsK. J.MeyersB. (2012). Predicting social identification over time: The role of group and personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.009
7.
CanadaB.StephanY.CaudroitJ.JaconelliA. (2013). Personality and subjective age among older adults: The mediating role of age-group identification. Aging & Mental Health, 17(8), 1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2013.807420
8.
CarloG.OkunM. A.KnightG. P.de GuzmanM. R. T. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion and prosocial value motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1293–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.012
9.
ChiaburuD. S.OhI.-S.BerryC. M.LiN.GardnerR. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1140–1166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024004
10.
CumberledgeJ. P.WilliamsM. L. (2023). Representation in music: College students’ perceptions of ensemble repertoire. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(2), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X211066844
11.
de BruinL. R. (2022). ‘In the cracks between freedom and fear’: Student reflections on identity and confidence learning in a creative music ensemble. Music Education Research, 24(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2042499
12.
de BruinL. R.WilliamsonP.WilsonE. (2020). Apprenticing the jazz performer through ensemble collaboration: A qualitative enquiry. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419887209
13.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2016). Personality, ideological attitudes, and group identity as predictors of political behavior in majority and minority ethnic groups. Political Psychology, 37(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12222
14.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
15.
FreerP. K.TanL. (2018). On large ensembles: A cross-cultural content analysis of English- and Chinese-language articles (2007–2017). Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 218, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.218.0069
16.
GeertH.HofstedeH.JanG.MinkovM. (2020). Cultures and organizations: Software for the mind. McGraw-Hill.
17.
GreenbergJ.BaronR. A. (2008). Behavior in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
18.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Prentice Hall.
19.
HeH.WangW.ZhuW.HarrisL. (2015). Service workers’ job performance: The roles of personality traits, organizational identification, and customer orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 49(11/12), 1751–1776. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2014-0132
20.
HeydelZ. L.SmithR. D.GrevstadN. (2023). The musician’s personality: Do personality traits vary according to ensemble membership?Psychology of Music, 51(2), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221096779
21.
HoganJ.HollandB. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.100
22.
HopkinsN.ReicherS. (2011). Identity, culture and contestation: Social identity as cross-cultural theory. Psychological Studies, 56(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0068-z
23.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
JettenJ.HaslamC.HaslamS. A. (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology Press.
25.
JohnO. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). Guilford Press.
26.
JonesB. D.ParkesK. A. (2010). The motivation of undergraduate music students: The impact of identification and talent beliefs on choosing a career in music education. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 19(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083709351816
27.
JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (2001). Music and emotion: Theory and research. Oxford University Press.
28.
KawaseS. (2016). Associations among music majors’ personality traits, empathy, and aptitude for ensemble performance. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614568697
29.
KishL. (2004). Statistical design for research (2nd ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
30.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
31.
KokotsakiD.HallamS. (2011). The perceived benefits of participative music making for non-music university students: A comparison with music students. Music Education Research, 13(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2011.577768
32.
KramerA.BhaveD. P.JohnsonT. D. (2014). Personality and group performance: The importance of personality composition and work tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.019
33.
LaakasuoM.RotkirchA.van DuijnM.BergV.JokelaM.David-BarrettT.MiettinenA.PearceE.DunbarR. (2020). Homophily in personality enhances group success among real-life friends. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710
34.
LudekeS. G.LarsenE. G. (2017). Problems with the Big Five assessment in the World Values Survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 112, 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.042
35.
MajorM. L. (2017). Building identity in collegiate midlevel choral ensembles: The director’s perspective. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416672891
36.
MajorM. L.DakonJ. M. (2016). Singer perceptions of collegiate mid-level choral experiences: A descriptive study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429416639232
37.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
38.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Del PilarG. H.RollandJ.-P.ParkerW. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291009
39.
McCraeR. R.TerraccianoA. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
40.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
41.
MeyerL. B. (1961). Emotion and meaning in music (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/heb.06267.0001.001
42.
MeyerR. D.DalalR. S.HermidaR. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309349309
43.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus users’ guide (8th ed.).
44.
Nájera CatalánH. E. (2019). Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A Monte Carlo study. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1950-z
45.
PaananenP. (2022). Musical backgrounds and musical identity development in pre-service music education and primary education students: A narrative study. Music Education Research, 24(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2021.2017421
46.
ParkJ.van den BroekK. L.BhullarN.OgunbodeC. A.SchermerJ. A.DoranR.ArdiR.HanssD.MaranD. A.AlbzourM.AquinoS. D.AyanianA. H.ChegeniR.ChukwuorjiJ. C.EneaV.GhanbarianE.GhorayebJ.JiangF.KehindeO. A.. . . YadavR. (2022). Comparison of the inter-item correlations of the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) between Western and non-Western contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 196, Article 111751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111751
47.
ParkerE. C. (2014). The process of social identity development in adolescent high school choral singers: A grounded theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413520009
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
RammstedtB.JohnO. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
53.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS.HalevyN.EidelsonR. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319225
54.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
SaniF.HerreraM.WakefieldJ.BorochO.GulyasC. (2012). Comparing social contact and group identification as predictors of mental health. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02101.x
57.
SantosI. L. S.PimentelC. E.MarianoT. E.AbreuA. B. D. (2023). The mediating role of music preference in the relationship between personality and pro-sociability. Psychology of Music, 51(4), 1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221137928
58.
SaucierG.ThalmayerA. G.PayneD. L.CarlsonR.SanogoL.Ole-KotikashL.ChurchA. T.KatigbakM. S.SomerO.SzarotaP.SzirmákZ.ZhouX. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12028
59.
SaucierG.WilsonK. R.WarkaJ. (2007). The structure of retrospective accounts of family environments: Related to the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701317012
SteffensN. K.LaRueC. J.HaslamC.WalterZ. C.CruwysT.MuntK. A.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.TarrantM. (2021). Social identification-building interventions to improve health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 15(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481
62.
SutherlandA.CartwrightP. A. (2022). Working together: Implications of leadership style for the music ensemble. International Journal of Music Education, 40(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614221084310
63.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
64.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
65.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
TorranceT. A.BugosJ. A. (2017). Music ensemble participation: Personality traits and music experience. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316675481
68.
TrimmerK. J.DominoM. A.BlantonJ. E. (2002). The impact of personality diversity on conflict in ISD teams. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(4), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2002.11647047
69.
WigginsJ. S. (1996). The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press.
70.
WilliamsE.DingleG.JettenJ.RowanC. (2019). Identification with arts-based groups improves mental wellbeing in adults with chronic mental health conditions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zhm7u
71.
ZhangJ.HanT. (2023). Individualism and collectivism orientation and the correlates among Chinese college students. Current Psychology, 42(5), 3811–3821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01735-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
