L1-Spanish L2-English listeners' perception of a Canadian-English /bIt/— /bId/—/bit/—/bid/ continuum was investigated. Results were largely consistent with the developmental stages for L1-Spanish listeners' acquisition of English /i/ and /I/ hypothesized by Escudero (2000): Stage 0, inability to distinguish. Stage 1, duration based. Stage 2, duration and spectral based. Stage 3, L1-English-like primarily spectral based. However, on the basis of the results an additional stage was hypothesized: Stage ½, multidimensional-category-goodness-difference assimilation to Spanish /i/, with English vowel tokens perceived as good examples of Spanish /i/ labeled as English /I/ and poor examples labeled as English /i/. It is hypothesized that L1-Spanish listeners' preference for duration cues is not an initial strategy for distinguishing English /i/ and /I/. Rather, it is a secondary developmental stage which emerges from an earlier stage when both spectral and duration cues are used.
Alvar, M. (1996). Paraguay. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica: El español de América [Manual of Spanish dialectology: The Spanish of America] (pp.196-208). Barcelona: Ariel.
2.
Álvarez González, J.A. (1980). Vocalismo español y vocalismo inglés [Spanish and English vowels]. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Computense de Madrid.
3.
Andruski, J.E., & Nearey, T.M. (1992). On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels in /bVb/ syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 390-410.
4.
Avis, W.S. (1973). The English language in Canada. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics (Vol. 10, pp.20-74). The Hague: Mouton.
5.
Avis, W.S. (1975). The phonemic segments of an Edmonton idiolect . In J. K. Chambers (Ed.), Canadian English: Origins and structures (pp.118-128). Toronto: Methuen.
6.
Best, C.T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A Perceptual Assimilation Model. In J. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp.167-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Best, C.T. (1995a). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.171-204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
8.
Best, C.T. (1995b). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English . In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (pp.217-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2001). Praat (version 4.0) [Computer software]. Available from: http//:www.praat.org
10.
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn't tell it all. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.279-304). Timonium, MD : York Press.
11.
Brennan, E.M., & Brennan, J.S. (1981). Measurement of accent and attitude toward MexicanAmerican speech. Journal of Psychological Research, 10, 487-501.
12.
Chambers, J.K. (1991). Canada. In J. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.89-107). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Contreras Oller, C.E. (1997) Características acústicas de las vocales altas anteriores del inglés: Estudio contrastivo de la producción de hablantes nativos del inglés y aprendices de inglés como lengua extranjera en el Departamento Idiomas - ULA (Acoustic characteristics of English high front vowels: Contrastive study of the production of native English speakers and English-as-a-foreign-language learners in the Language Department, University of the Andes). Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 13, 127-152.
14.
Crowther, C., & Mann, V. (1992). Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 711-722.
15.
Escudero, P. (2000). Developmental patterns in the adult L2 acquisition of new contrasts: The acoustic cue weighting in the perception of Scottish tense/lax vowels by Spanish speakers. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
16.
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization [Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.
17.
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.
18.
Fischer, R.M., & Ohde, R.N. (1990). Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1250-1259.
19.
Flege, J.E. (1988). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders: A review (pp.224-401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
20.
Flege, J.E. (1991). The interlingual identification of Spanish and English vowels: Orthographic evidence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 701-731.
21.
Flege, J.E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233-277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
22.
Flege, J.E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics , 25, 437-470.
23.
Flege, J.E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67-83.
24.
Flege, J.E., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 23, 527-552.
25.
Flege, J.E., & MacKay, I.R.A. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1-34.
26.
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995a). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication , 16, 1-26.
27.
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995b). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125-3134.
28.
Flege, J.E., Munro, M.J., & Skelton, L. (1992). Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. Journal of The Acoustical Society of America, 92, 128-143.
29.
González Álvarez, J., & Cervera Crespo, T. (2001). El efecto magnético en la percepción de las vocales españolas: Estudio perceptivo sobre la vocal /i/ [The perceptual magnet effect for Spanish vowels: Perceptual study of the vowel /i/]. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 11, 212-241.
30.
Guenther, F.H., & Bohland, J.W. (2002). Learning sound categories: A neural model and supporting experiments. Acoustical Science and Technology , 23(4), 213-220.
31.
Halle, M., Hughes, G., & Radley, J.-P. (1957). Acoustic properties of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 107-116.
32.
Hammond, R.M. (1986). Error analysis and the natural approach to teaching languages. Lenguas Modernas, 13, 129-139.
33.
Harris, J.W. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2001). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. New York: Springer.
35.
Hernández Alonso, C. (1996). Castilla la Vieja. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica: El español de España [Manual of Spanish dialectology: The Spanish of Spain] (pp.198-212). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
36.
Hillenbrand, J., Ingrisano, D.R., Smith, B.L., & Flege, J.E. (1984). Perception of the voiced-voiceless contrast in syllable-final stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 18-26.
37.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
38.
Hualde, J.I. (1989). Procesos consonánticos y estructuras geométricas en español [Consonant processes and geometric structures in Spanish]. Lingüística (Revista de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina), 1, 7-44. [Reprinted in Panorama de la fonología española actual, pp.395-431, by J. Gil (ed.), 2000. Madrid, Spain: Arco Libros.]
39.
Imai, S., Flege, J.E., & Wayland, R. (2002). Perception of cross-language vowel differences: A longitudinal study of native Spanish learners of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2364.
40.
Johnson, D.E. (1998). Applied multivariate methods for data analysis . Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
41.
Kendall, R.A. (2001). Music experiment development system: MEDS (version 2001-B) [Computer software]. Available from: http://www.ethnomusic.ucla.edu/systematic/Faculty/Kendall/meds.htm
42.
Kondaurova, M.V., & Francis, A.L. (2006). Russian and Spanish listeners' perception of English tense/lax vowel contrast: Contribution of native language allophony and individual experience. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3293.
43.
Kuhl, P.K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the "perceptual magnet effect". In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.121-154). Timonium, MD: York Press.
44.
MacDonald, M. (1989). The influence of Spanish phonology on the English spoken by United States Hispanics. In P. C. Bjarkman & R. M. Hammond (Eds.), American Spanish pronunciation: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp.215-236). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .
45.
Marín Gálvez, R. (1995). La duración vocálica [Vowel duration]. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, 10, 213-226.
46.
Markou, M., & Singh, S. (2003a).Novelty detection: A review-part 1: Statistical approaches. Signal Processing, 83, 2481-2497.
47.
Markou, M., & Singh, S. (2003b). Novelty detection: A review-part 2: Neural network based approaches. Signal Processing, 83, 2499-2521.
48.
Maye, J. (2000). Learning speech sound categories from statistical information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
49.
Maye, J., Werker, J.F., & Gerken, L.A. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111.
50.
McAllister, R., Flege, J.E., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229-258.
Mermelstein, P. (1978). On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 331-336.
53.
Moreno Fernández, F. (1996). Castilla la Nueva. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica: El español de España [Manual of Spanish dialectology: The Spanish of Spain] (pp. 213-232). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
54.
Morrison, G.S. (2002a). Effects of L1 duration experience on Japanese and Spanish listeners' perception of English high front vowels. Unpublished master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. Available from: http://www.sfu.ca/linguistics/graduate/recent_theses.html
55.
Morrison, G.S. (2002b). Perception of English /i/ and /I/ by Japanese and Spanish listeners: Longitudinal results. In G. S. Morrison & L. Zsoldos (Eds.), Proceedings of the North West Linguistics Conference 2002 (pp.29-48). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University Linguistics Graduate Student Association. Available from: http://edocs.lib.sfu.ca/projects/NWLC2002
56.
Morrison, G.S. (2002c). Spanish listeners' use of vowel spectral properties as cues to postvocalic consonant voicing in English. Collected papers of the First Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics [CD-ROM]. Mexico, DF: Mexican Institute of Acoustics.
57.
Morrison, G.S. (2006). Methodological issues in L2 perception research, and vowel spectral cues in Spanish listeners' perception of word-final /t/ and /d/ in Spanish. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology (pp.35-47). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available from http://www.lingref.comdocument#1324
58.
Morrison, G.S. (2007). Logistic regression modelling for first- and second-language perception data. In M. J. Solé, P. Prieto, & J. Mascaró (Eds.), Segmental and prosodic issues in Romance phonology (pp.219-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
59.
Navarro Tomás, T. (1916). Cantidad de las vocales acentuadas [The quantity of stressed vowels]. Revista de Filología Española, 3, 387-408.
60.
Navarro Tomás, T. (1965). Manual de pronunciación española (12th ed.). Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
61.
Nearey, T.M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347-373.
62.
Nearey, T.M. (1995). Evidence for the perceptual relevance of vowel-inherent spectral change for front vowels in Canadian English. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: Stockholm 1995 (pp.678-681). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH.
63.
Nearey, T.M. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3241-3254.
64.
Nearey, T.M., & Assmann, P.F. (1986). Modeling the role of vowel inherent spectral change in vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80, 1297-1308.
65.
Nuño Álvarez, M.P. (1996). Cantabria. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica: El español de España [Manual of Spanish dialectology: The Spanish of Spain] (pp.183-196). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
Quilis, A. (1993). Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas [Treatise on Spanish phonology and phonetics]. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
68.
Quilis, A., & Esgueva, M. (1983). Realización de los fonemas vocálicos españoles en posición fonética normal [Realization of Spanish vowel phonemes in normal phonetic position]. In Estudios de Fonética I, Colectanea Phonetica VII (pp.159-252). Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
69.
Raphael, J.L. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants inAmerican English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1296-1303.
70.
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R.A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72.
71.
Sedano, M., & Bentivoglio, P. (1996). Venezuela. In M. Alvar (Ed.), Manual de dialectología hispánica: El español de América [Manual of Spanish dialectology: The Spanish of America] (pp.116-133). Barcelona, Spain: Ariel.
72.
Smits, R., Serano, J., & Jongman, A. (2006). Categorization of sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 733-754.
73.
Summers, W.V. (1987). Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: Articulatory and acoustic analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 847-863.
74.
Summers, W.V. (1988). F1 structure provides information for final-consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 485-492.
75.
Tsukada, K. (1996). Acoustic analysis of Japanese-accented vowels in English. In P. McCormick & A. Russell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology (pp.373-378). Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
76.
Tsukada, K. (1999). An acoustic phonetic analysis of Japanese-accented English. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University , Sydney, Australia.
77.
Vallabha, G.K., & McClelland, J.L. (2007). Learning new speech categories in adult-hood: Costs and benefits of Hebbian attractors in topographic maps . Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(1), 53-73.
78.
Wang, X., & Munro, M.J. (1999). The perception of English tense-lax vowel pairs by native Mandarin speakers: The effect of training on attention to temporal and spectral cues. In J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala , D. Granville, & A. C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: San Francisco 1999 (pp.125-128). Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley.
79.
Walsh, T., & Parker, F. (1983). Vowel length and vowel transition cues to [±voice] in post-vocalic stops. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 407-412.
80.
Wells, J.C. (1982). Accents of English 3: Beyond the British Isles . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
Werker, J.F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental model of speech processing . Language Learning and Development, 1, 197-234.
82.
Whalen, D.H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. Perception & Psychophysics , 46, 284-292.
83.
Wolf, C. (1978). Voicing cues in English final stops. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 299-309.
84.
Zimmerman, S.A., & Sapon, S.M. (1958). Note on vowel duration seen cross-linguistically . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 152-153.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
