This paper analyses the skill and age structure of commuters in 14 EU countries. Theory implies that commuters can be either more or less able than stayers, but are always less able and older than migrants. Empirically, all types of commuters are younger and have higher education than region stayers, but older and less educated than migrants. Internal commuters are better educated and younger than cross-border commuters, education decreases while age increases with distance commuted and recent migrants are younger but also more highly educated than commuters.
BenitoA.OswaldA. J. (2000) Commuting in Great Britain in the 1990’s. Department of Economics, University of Warwick.
2.
BorjasG. (1987) Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 531–553.
3.
BorjasG. (1999) The economic analysis of immigration, in: AshenfelterO.CardD. (Eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A, pp. 1697–1760. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4.
BrückerH.TrübswetterP. (2007) Do the best go west? An analysis of the self-selection of employed east-west migrants in Germany, Empirica, 34(4), pp. 371–395.
5.
Cabral-VieiraJ. A.CoutoJ. P. A.Borges TiagoM. T. (2006) Regional differences in returns to education in Portugal. Paper presented at the 46th Congress of the Regional Science Association, Thessaly.
6.
ChiswickB. R. (1999) Are immigrants positively self-selected?, American Economic Review, 89, pp. 181–185.
7.
ChiswickB. R. (2000) Are immigrants favourably self-selected? An economic analysis. Discussion Paper No. 131, IZA, Bonn.
8.
EliassonK.LindgrenU.WesterlundO. (2003) Geographical labour mobility: migration or commuting?, Regional Studies, 37, pp. 827–837.
9.
FerraginaA. M.PastoreF. (2008) Mind the gap: unemployment in the new EU regions, Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, pp. 73–113.
10.
GottholmsederG.TheurlE. (2007) Determinants of cross-border commuting: do cross-border commuters within the household matter?, Journal of Borderland Studies, 22, pp. 97–112.
11.
GriesT.KraftM.PieckC. (2011) Interregional migration, self-selection and the returns to education in Brazil, The Annals of Regional Science, 46, pp. 707–732.
12.
HazansM. (2003a) Returns to education in the Baltic countries. Manuscript, University of Latvia.
13.
HazansM. (2003b) Commuting in the Baltic states: patterns, determinants and gains. Working Paper No. B02/2003, Centre for European Integration Studies, University of Bonn.
14.
HuberP. (2007) Regional labour market developments in transition: a survey of the empirical literature, European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4, pp. 263–298.
15.
HuberP. (2011) The self-selection of commuters. Working Paper No. 2011-6, Working Papers in Economics and Finance, University of Salzburg.
16.
HuberP.NowotnyK. (2011) Moving across borders: who is willing to migrate or to commute?, Regional Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.624509.
17.
HuntJ. (2004) Are migrants more skilled than non-migrants? Repeat, return and same-employer migrants, Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, pp. 830–849.
18.
OmmerenJ. vanRietveldP.NijkampP. (1999) Job moving, residential moving, and commuting: a search perspective, Journal of Urban Economics, 46, pp. 230–253.
19.
PaciP.TiongsonE. R.WalewskiM.LiwinskiJ.StoilkovaM. M. (2007) Internal labour mobility in central Europe and the Baltic region. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
20.
RouwendalJ. (1999) Spatial job search and commuting distances, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29(4), pp. 491–517.
21.
SorekG. (2009) Migration costs, commuting costs and intercity population sorting, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 66, pp. 335–357.
22.
WhiteM. (1986) Sex differences in urban commuting patterns, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 368–372.