The analysis of sequence data poses a great challenge; existing methods for the comparison of sequences take what theoretical grounding they have from other fields (most importantly, genetics). We argue that set theory provides a way of establishing the relations between sequences that has a natural application to the case in which the sequences are orderings of a set of events, all compatible with an underlying partial order shared by multiple respondents. We also examine the possibility that observed differences in sequence data come from a stochastic process in which some events are poorly ordered because respondents cannot discriminate between them. We show that such methods shed light on several quantities that have been of interest to researchers, such as the degree of consensus within a group as to ideal sequences, the degree of respondent accuracy in reporting, and the degree to which plans and reality coincide.
AbbottAndrew. 1998. “The Causal Devolution.” Sociological Methods and Research27:148–81.
2.
AbellPeter. 1993. “Some Aspects of Narrative Method.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology18:93–134.
3.
AisenbreySilkeFasangAnette. 2017. “The Interplay of Work and Family Trajectories over the Life Course: Germany and the United States in Comparison.” American Journal of Sociology122:1448–484.
4.
BarbanNicolaBillariFrancesco. 2012. “Classifying Life Course Trajectories: A Comparison of Latent Class and Sequence Analysis.” Applied Statistician61:765–84.
5.
BearmanPeterFarisRobertMoodyJames. 1999. “Blocking the Future: New Solutions for Old Problems in Historical Social Science.” Social Science History23:501–33.
6.
BillariFrancesco C.FürnkranzJohannesPrskawetzAlexia. 2006. “Timing, Sequencing and Quantum of Life Course Events: A Machine Learning Approach.” European Journal of Population22:37–65.
7.
BillariFrancesco C.PiccarretaRaffaella. 2005. “Analyzing Demographic Life Courses through Sequence Analysis.” Mathematical Population Studies12:81–106.
8.
BradleyRalph A.1953. “Some Statistical Methods in Taste Testing and Quality Evaluation.” Biometrics9:22–38.
9.
BradleyRalph A.1965. “Another Interpretation of a Model for Paired Comparisons.” Psychometrika30:315–18.
10.
BradleyRalph A.TerryMilton E.. 1952. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika39:324–45.
11.
BreigerRonald L.SmithJulia G.. 2018. “Insurgencies and Networks of Event Orderings.” Sociological Theory 36: 201–209.
12.
CoombsClyde H.1964. A Theory of Data. New York: John Wiley.
13.
CornwellBenjamin. 2015. Social Sequence Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CornwellBenjaminWarburtonElizabeth. 2014. “Work Schedules and Community Ties.” Work and Occupations41:139–84.
15.
CoxonAnthony P. M.JonesCharles L.. 1978. The Images of Occupational Prestige. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
16.
DavidH. A.1988. The Method of Paired Comparisons. 2nd ed. London, England: Charles Griffin.
17.
ElzingaCees H.2003. “Sequence Similarity: A Non-aligning Technique.” Sociological Methods and Research32:3–29.
18.
ElzingaCees H.2005. “Combinatorial Representations of Token Sequences.” Journal of Classification22:87–118.
19.
ElzingaCees H.2010. “Complexity of Categorical Time Series.” Sociological Methods and Research38:463–81.
20.
FasangAnette EvaLiaoTim Futing. 2014. “Visualizing Sequences in the Social Sciences: Relative Frequency Sequence Plots.” Sociological Methods & Research43:643–76.
21.
FelsnerStefanTrotterWilliam T.. 2000. “Dimension, Graph and Hypergraph Coloring.” Order17:167–77.
22.
FirthDavid. 1993. “Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates.” Biometrika80:27–38.
23.
FryeMargaretTrinitapoliJenny. 2015. “Ideals as Anchors for Romantic Experiences.” American Sociological Review80:496–525.
24.
GagnonJohn H.SimonWilliam. 1973. Sexual Conduct. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
25.
GuttmanLouis. 1950. “The Basis for Scalogram Analysis.” Pp. 60–90 in Measurement and Prediction, Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, Volume IV, edited by StoufferSamuel AGuttmanL.SuchmanEdward A.ClausenJohn A.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
HalpinBrendan. 2010. “Optimal Matching Analysis and Life-course Data: The Importance of Duration.” Sociological Methods & Research38:365–88.
27.
HardingDavid J.2007. “The Cultural Context, Sexual Behavior, and Romantic Relationships in Disadvantaged Neighborhoods.” American Sociological Review72:341–64.
MartinJohn Levi. 2009. Social Structures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
MoodyJames. 2002. “The Importance of Relationship Timing for Diffusion: Indirect Connectivity and STD Infection Risk.” Social Forces81:25–56.
31.
PaikAnthonyWoodleyVernon. 2012. “Symbols and Investments as Signals: Courtship Behaviors in Adolescent Sexual Relationships.” Rationality and Society24:3–36.
32.
PeirceCharles S.JastrowJ.. [1885] 1993. “On Small Differences of Sensation.” Pp. 122–35 in Writings of Charles S. Peirce, volume 5, edited by ChristianJ. W. Kloesel. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
33.
PretzelOliver. 1977. “On the Dimension of Partially Ordered Sets.” Journal of Combinatorial Theory A22:146–52.
34.
RaschGeorg. 1966. “An Individualistic Approach to Item Analysis.” Pp. 89–107 in Readings in Mathematical Social Science, edited by LazarsfeldPaul F.HenryNeil W.. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35.
RokeachMilton. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
36.
SmithTammy. 2007. “Narrative Boundaries and the Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Conciliation.” Poetics35:22–46.
37.
SollerBrian. 2014. “Caught in a Bad Romance: Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Mental Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior55:56–72.
38.
SollerBrian. 2015. “I Did Not Do It My Way: The Peer Context of Inauthentic Romantic Relationships.” Sociological Perspectives58:337–57.
39.
StovelKatherineSavageMichaelBearmanPeter. 1996. “Ascription into Achievement: Models of Career Systems at Lloyds Bank, 1890–1970.” American Journal of Sociology102:358–99.
40.
ThomasWilliam I.ZnanieckiFlorian. 1918. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, Volume I: Primary-group Organization. Boston, MA: Gorham Press.
41.
TrotterWilliam T.1992. Combinatorics and Partially Ordered Sets: Dimension Theory. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
42.
TurnerHeatherFirthDavid. 2012. “Bradley–Terry Models in R: The BradleyTerry2 Package.” Journal of Statistical Software48:1–21.
43.
WarrenJohn RobertLuoLiyingHalpern-MannersAndrewRaymoJames M.PalloniAlberto. 2015. “Do Different Methods for Modeling Age-graded Trajectories Yield Consistent and Valid Results?” American Journal of Sociology120:1809–856.
44.
WileyJamesMartinJohn Levi. 1999. “Algebraic Representations of Beliefs and Attitudes: Partial Order Models.” Sociological Methodology1999:113–46.
45.
WuLawrence. 2000. “Some Comments on ‘Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect.’” Sociological Methods and Research29:41–64.
46.
YeatmanSaraTrinitapoliJenny. 2017. “Awareness and Perceived Fairness of Option B+ in Malawi: A Population-level Perspective.” Journal of the International AIDS Society20:21467.
47.
ZerubavelEviatar. 2003. Time Maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
