Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We propose some theoretical and empirical advances by supplying the methodology for analyzing the factors that influence two sensitive variables when data are collected by randomized response (RR) survey modes. First, we provide the framework for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimates of logistic regression coefficients under the RR simple and crossed models, then we carry out a simulation study to assess the performance of the estimation procedure. Finally, logistic regression analysis is illustrated by considering real data about cannabis use and legalization and about abortion and illegal immigration. The empirical results bring out certain considerations about the effect of the RR and direct questioning survey modes on the estimates. The inference about the sign and the significance of the regression coefficients can contribute to the debate on whether the RR approach is an effective survey method to reduce misreporting and improve the validity of analyses.

Keywords

maximum likelihood estimates prevalence estimates privacy protection randomized response theory sensitive questions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaudhuri

2011. Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Chaudhuri

Christofides

T. C.

. 2013. Indirect Questioning in Sample Surveys. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Chaudhuri

Christofides

T. C.

Rao

C.R.

. 2016. Handbook of Statistics 34—Data Gathering, Analysis and Protection of Privacy through Randomized Response Techniques: Qualitative and Quantitative Human Traits. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

Chaudhuri

Mukerjee

. 1988. Randomized Response: Theory and Techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Christofides

T. C.

2005. “Randomized Response Technique for Two Sensitive Characteristics at the Same Time.” Metrika 62:53–63.

Corstange

2009. “Sensitive Questions, Truthful Answers? Modeling the List Experiment with LISTIT.” Political Analysis 17:45–63.

Cruyff

M. J. L. F.

Böckenholt

Van der Heijden

P. G. M.

Frank

L. E.

. 2016. “A Review of Regression Procedures for Randomized Response Data, Including Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression, the Proportional Odds Model and Item Response Model, and Self-protective Responses.” in Handbook of Statistics 34—Data Gathering, Analysis and Protection of Privacy through Randomized Response Techniques: Qualitative and Quantitative Human Traits, edited by Chaudhuri

Christofides

T.C.

Rao

C.R.

. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Pp. 287–315

Elffers

Van der Heijden

Hezemans

. 2003. “Explaining Regulatory Non-compliance: A Survey Study of Rule Transgression for Two Dutch Instrumental Laws, Applying the Randomized Response Method.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19:409–39.

Ewemooje

O. S.

Amahia

G. N.

Abedola

F. B.

. 2017. “Estimating Prevalence of Induced Abortion and Multiple Sexual Partners Using Improved Randomized Response Technique for Two Sensitive Attributes.” Communication in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications 3:21–28.

10.

Fox

J. A.

2016. Randomized Response and Related Methods: Surveying Sensitive Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

11.

Fox

J. A.

Tracy

P. E.

. 1986. Randomized Response: A Method for Sensitive Surveys. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.

12.

Glonek

G. F. V.

McCullagh

. 1995. “Multivariate Logistic Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57:533–46.

13.

Greenberg

B. G.

Abul-Ela

Simmons

W. R.

Horvitz

D. G.

. 1969. “The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 64:520–39.

14.

Heck

D. W.

Hoffmann

Moshagen

. 2018. “Detecting Nonadherence without Loss in Efficiency: A Simple Extension of the Crosswise Model.” Behavior Research Methods 50:1895–905.

15.

Höglinger

Jann

. 2018. “More Is Not Always Better: An Experimental Individual-Level Validation of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model.” PLoS One 13(8):e0201770. Retrieved 14 August 2018 (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201770).

16.

Hsieh

S. H.

Lee

S. M.

C. S.

S. H.

. 2016. “An Alternative to Unrelated Randomized Response Techniques with Logistic Regression Analysis.” Statistical Methods & Applications 25:601–21.

17.

Hsieh

S. H.

Lee

S. M.

Shen

P. S.

. 2010. “Logistic Regression Analysis of Randomized Response Data with Missing Covariates.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140:927–40.

18.

Jann

Jerke

Krumpal

. 2012. “Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76:32–49.

19.

Kerkvliet

1994. “Estimating a Logit Model with Randomized Data: The Case of Cocaine Use.” Australian Journal of Statistics 36:9–20.

20.

Korndörfer

Krumpal

Schmukle

S. C.

. 2014. “Measuring and Explaining Tax Evasion: Improving Self-Reports Using the Crosswise Model.” Journal of Economic Psychology 45:18–32.

21.

Krumpal

2012. “Estimating the Prevalence of Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism in Germany: A Comparison of the Randomized Response Technique and Direct Questioning.” Social Science Research 41:1387–403.

22.

Lee

C. S.

Sedory

S. A.

Singh

. 2013. “Estimating at Least Seven Measures of Qualitative Variables from a Single Sample Using Randomized Response Technique.” Statistics and Probability Letters 83:399–409.

23.

Lensvelt-Mulders

G. J. L. M.

Hox

J. J.

Van der Heijden

P. G. M.

Mass

C. J. M.

. 2005. “Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research. Thirty-five Years of Validation.” Sociological Methods & Research 33:319–48.

24.

Lensvelt-Mulders

G. J. L. M.

Van der Heijden

P. G. M.

Laudy

Van Gils

. 2006. “A Validation of a Computer-Assisted Randomized Response Survey to Estimate the Prevalence of Fraud in Social Security.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 169:305–18.

25.

Maddala

G. S.

1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Perri

P. F.

Pelle

Stranges

. 2016. “Estimating Induced Abortion and Foreign Irregular Presence Using the Randomized Response Crossed Model.” Social Indicators Research 129:601–18.

27.

Scheers

N. J.

Dayton

C. M.

. 1998. “Covariate Randomized Response Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83:969–74.

28.

Tian

G. L.

Tang

M. L.

. 2014. Incomplete Categorical Data Design: Non-Randomized Response Techniques for Sensitive Questions in Surveys. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

29.

Tian

G. L.

J. W.

Tang

M. L.

Geng

. 2007. “A New Non-Randomized Model for Analysing Sensitive Questions with Binary Outcomes.” Statistics in Medicine 26:4238–52.

30.

Van den Hout

Van der Heijden

P. G. M.

Gilchrist

. 2007. “The Logistic Regression Model with Response Variables Subject to Randomized Response.” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50:6060–69.

31.

Ulrich

Schröter

Stringel

. 2012. “Asking Sensitive Questions: A Statistical Power Analysis of Randomized Response Models.” Psychological Methods 17: 623–41.

32.

Warner

S. L.

1965. “Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 60:63–9.

33.

Wolter

Preisendörfer

. 2013. “Asking Sensitive Questions: An Evaluation of the Randomized Response Technique Versus Direct Questioning Using Individual Data Validation.” Sociological Methods & Research 42:321–53.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.21 MB