Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Entertainment Contributes to Adaptive Coping: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Interplay Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Entertainment,Escapism,and Meaning Making
Traditionally, research has focused on investigating short-term effects of entertainment media use. This paper, however, takes a salutogenetic perspective in exploring the potential long-term effects of entertainment use on meaning making as an adaptive coping skill. We propose three theoretical pathways explaining potential effects of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment, as well as escapist media use on meaning making—through vicarious experiences of adversity, experiencing positive affect, and distraction. In two preregistered longitudinal studies with varying time intervals (6 months, weekly, and daily observations), both hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment use showed positive within-person relationships with meaning making daily and weekly, but not over 6 months. Escapist media use negatively predicted meaning making across all time intervals. Additionally, vicarious experience and positive affect, but not distraction, mediated these effects. Our findings shed light on temporal dynamics of entertainment use and emphasize its role in fostering meaning making.
AndersonD. R.CollinsP. A.SchmittK. L.JacobvitzR. S. (1996). Stressful life events and television viewing. Communication Research, 23(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023003001
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
4.
BartschA.HartmannT. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921
5.
BartschA.KalchA.OliverM. B. (2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10/gmddcs
6.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10/gcrnkw
7.
BellA.FairbrotherM.JonesK. (2019). Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity, 53(2), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x
8.
BonusJ. A.PeeblesA.MaresM.-L.SarmientoI. G. (2018). Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokémon Go as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychology, 21(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1305280
9.
BonusJ. A.WattsJ.FrancemoneC. J. (2022). When “meaningless” means more: Biographic resonance and audience appreciation of popular entertainment. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac028
10.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10/d2jv23
11.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10/c98n64
12.
de GraafA.DasE. (2023). Portrayals of threatened needs and human virtue: A review of the content of eudaimonic entertainment. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2130811
13.
de LeeuwR. N. H.WeijersA.AhleA.-M.DaalmansS. (2024). How stories in the media can be meaningful in children’s lives. Media Psychology, 27(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2247322
14.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD. W.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
FolkmanS.MoskowitzJ. T. (2007). Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress. In HewstoneM.SchutH.de WitJ.Van Den BosK.StroebeM. (Eds.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 193–208). Psychology Press.
17.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10/bkc3tg
18.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/d2mt85
19.
GreenM. C.BrockT. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10/bkr5dt
20.
HalfmannA.ReineckeL. (2021). Binge-watching as case of escapist entertainment use. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 180–203). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190072216.013.11
21.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/f67cvh
22.
HeineS. J.ProulxT.VohsK. D. (2006). The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10/c59ncp
23.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2014). (The feeling of) meaning-as-information. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10/f5xx38
24.
HookerS. A.MastersK. S.ParkC. L. (2018). A meaningful life is a healthy life: A conceptual model linking meaning and meaning salience to health. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000115
25.
HutaV. (2017). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In ReineckeL.OliverM. B. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 14–33). Routledge.
26.
Janicke-BowlesS. H. (2025). Introducing the transcendent media experience model (TMEM). Communication Research, 52(4), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241287830
27.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.RaneyA. A.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.JonesR. P.CoxD. (2021). Exploring the spirit in U.S. audiences: The role of the virtue of transcendence in inspiring media consumption. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019894927
28.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.RaneyA. A.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.ZhaoD.NeumannD.ClaytonR. B.HendryA. A. (2022). Inspiration on social media: Applying an entertainment perspective to longitudinally explore mental health and well-being. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5817/cp2022-2-1
29.
KalischR.MüllerM. B.TüscherO. (2015). A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1400082X
30.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9068-7
31.
KatzE.FoulkesD. (1962). On the use of the mass media as “escape”: Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1086/267111
KingL. A.HicksJ. A.KrullJ. L.Del GaisoA. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/10/dj9bb4
34.
KlineR. B. (Ed.). (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
35.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.HastallM. R.RossmannM. (2009). Coping or escaping? Effects of life dissatisfaction on selective exposure. Communication Research, 36(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10/bd9fqm
36.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
37.
LockwoodP.ShaughnessyS. C.FortuneJ. L.TongM.-O. (2012). Social comparisons in novel situations: Finding inspiration during life transitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212447234
38.
MartelaF.StegerM. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
39.
MeierA.MeltzerC. E.ReineckeL. (2018). Coping with stress or losing control? Facebook-induced strains among emerging adults as a consequence of escapism versus procrastination. In KühneR.BaumgartnerS. E.KochT.HoferM. (Eds.), Youth and media: Current perspectives on media use and effects (pp. 167–186). Nomos.
40.
NabiR. L.DemetriadesS.WalterN.QiL. (2023). Can a video a day keep stress away? A test of media prescriptions. Health Communication, 38(13), 3080–3090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2134700
41.
NabiR. L.DemetriadesS.WalterN.QiL.WangL. (2024). Media prescriptions for goal achievement: The differential effect of inspiring versus humorous content. Psychology of Popular Media, 13(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000448
42.
NeubaumG.KrämerN. C.AltK. (2020). Psychological effects of repeated exposure to elevating entertainment: An experiment over the period of 6 weeks. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000235
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
45.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
46.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A.SlaterM. D.AppelM.HartmannT.BartschA.SchneiderF. M.Janicke-BowlesS. H.KrämerN.MaresM.-L.VordererP.RiegerD.DaleK. R.DasE. (2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx020
47.
OttJ. M.TanN. Q. P.SlaterM. D. (2021). Eudaimonic media in lived experience: Retrospective responses to eudaimonic vs. non-eudaimonic films. Mass Communication & Society, 24(5), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1912774
48.
OuwerkerkJ. W.JohnsonB. K. (2016). Motives for online friending and following: The dark side of social network site connections. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664219
49.
ParkC. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
50.
ParkC. L. (2016). Meaning making and resilience. In KumarU. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of psychosocial resilience (pp. 162–172). Routledge.
PosslerD.ScheperJ.RaneyA. A.KlimmtC. (2025). Is there an easy path to eudaimonia? Novel insights on the dual-process perspective in media entertainment. Communication Research, 52, 454–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241306709
53.
PrestinA.NabiR. (2020). Media prescriptions: Exploring the therapeutic effects of entertainment media on stress relief, illness symptoms, and goal attainment. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa001
54.
RaneyA. A.JanickeS. H.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.JonesR. P.CoxD. (2018). Profiling the audience for self-transcendent media: A national survey. Mass Communication & Society, 21(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1413195
55.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
56.
ReineckeL.HartmannT.EdenA. (2014). The guilty couch potato: The role of ego depletion in reducing recovery through media use. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12107
57.
ReineckeL.KrelingR. J. (2022). The longitudinal influence of hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment preferences on psychological resilience and wellbeing. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 991458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.991458
58.
ReineckeL.RiegerD. (2021). Media entertainment as a self-regulatory resource: The recovery and resilience in entertaining media use (R2EM) model. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Entertainment Theory (pp. 755–779). Oxford University Press.
59.
ReineckeL.TrepteS. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
60.
RiegerD.ReineckeL.FrischlichL.BenteG. (2014). Media entertainment and well-being-linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12097
61.
RiepenhausenA.WackerhagenC.ReppmannZ. C.DeterH.-C.KalischR.VeerI. M.WalterH. (2022). Positive cognitive reappraisal in stress resilience, mental health, and well-being: A comprehensive systematic review. Emotion Review, 14(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221114642
62.
RothS.CohenL. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819. https://doi.org/10/d3nsh2
63.
SchneiderF. M.BartschA.OliverM. B. (2019). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the appreciation, Fun, and suspense scales across US-American and German samples. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000236
64.
SlaterM. D.OliverM. B.AppelM. (2019). Poignancy and mediated wisdom of experience: Narrative impacts on willingness to accept delayed rewards. Communication Research, 46(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623838
65.
SlaterM. D.OliverM. B.AppelM.TchernevJ. M.SilverN. A. (2018). Mediated wisdom of experience revisited: Delay discounting, acceptance of death, and closeness to future self. Human Communication Research, 44(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx004
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
68.
TingleyD.YamamotoT.HiroseK.KeeleL.ImaiK. (2014). Mediation: R Package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10/gdgzgj
VordererP.ReineckeL. (2015). From mood to meaning: The changing model of the user in entertainment research. Communication Theory, 25(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12082
71.
WardS.WomickJ.TitovaL.KingL. (2023). Meaning in life and coping with everyday stressors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211068910
72.
WeinmannC.VordererP. (2018). A normative perspective for political entertainment research: Connecting deliberative democracy and entertainment theory. Communication Theory, 28(4), 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty018
73.
WirzD. S.EdenA.UlusoyE.EllithorpeM. E. (2025). Beyond pleasurable and meaningful: Psychologically rich entertainment experiences. PLoS One, 20(2), e0315596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315596
74.
WolfersL. N. (2024). A social constructivist viewpoint of media effects: Extending the social influence model of technology use to media effects. Communication Theory, 34, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae015
WroschC.HeckhausenJ.LachmanM. E. (2000). Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10/b8n9f9
77.
WulfT.BreuerJ. S.SchmittJ. B. (2022). Escaping the pandemic present: The relationship between nostalgic media use, escapism, and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychology of Popular Media, 11(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000357
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
