Social scientists have long recognized that individual experiences in particular settings shape behavior, and as a result, many service sectors regularly evaluate client perceptions. This is not the case in the juvenile justice system. Using a sample of 519 serious juvenile offenders (92% male, ethnically diverse) from two sites, this study evaluated the impact of youth perceptions along eight dimensions of an institutional experience on recidivism following release, with recidivism measured as self-reported antisocial activity, rearrest, or a return to a facility. The authors demonstrated that more positive perceptions within and across dimensions of the juvenile setting reduce involvement in the outcomes assessed, even after controlling for individual characteristics and facility type. Implications for juvenile justice practice and policy are discussed.
AbramsL. S. (2006). Listening to juvenile offenders: Can residential treatment prevent recidivism?Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 61-85.
2.
AllisonP. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
AltschulerD.BrashR. (2004). Adolescent and teenage offenders: Confronting the challenges and opportunities of reentry. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 72-87.
4.
AndenaesJ. (1974). Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
6.
AscherB. H.FarmerE. M. Z.BurnsB. J.AngoldA. (1996). The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA): Description and psychometrics. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(1), 12-20.
7.
AshkarP. J.KennyD. T. (2008). Views from the inside: Young offenders’ subjective experience of incarceration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 584-597.
8.
BerwickD. M. (1989). Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 53-56.
9.
BrendgenM.VitaroF.BukowskiW. M. (2000). Deviant friends and early adolescents’ emotional and behavior adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 173-189.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BouffardL.PiqueroN. (2010). Defiance theory and life course explanations of persistent offending. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 227-252.
12.
CaspiA.MoffittT.ThorntonA.FreedmanD.AmellJ.HarringtonH. (1996). The life history calendar: A research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6, 101-114.
13.
ChassinL.RogoschF.BarreraM. (1991). Substance use and symptomatology among adolescent children of alcoholics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 449-463.
14.
ChowanecG. D. (1994). Continuous quality improvement: Conceptual foundations and application to mental health care. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 789-792.
15.
ChungH.SchubertC. A.MulveyE. P. (2007). An empirical portrait of community reentry among serious juvenile offenders in two metropolitan cities. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1402-1426.
16.
CoatesR.MillerA.OhlinL. (1978). Diversity in a youth correctional system: Handling delinquents in Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17.
CounteM. A.MeurerS. (2001). Issues in the assessment of continuous quality improvement implementation in health care organizations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13, 197-207.
18.
CullenF. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43, 1-42.
19.
DodgeK. A.DishionT. J.LansfordJ. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
DonabedianA. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed?Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 1743-1748.
21.
ElliottD. S.MenardS. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In HawkinsJ. D. (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28-67). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FaganJ.PiqueroA. (2007). Rational choice and developmental influences on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 715-748.
23.
FaganJ.TylerT. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217-242.
24.
FarringtonD. (2004). Conduct disorder, aggression, and delinquency. In LernerR.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 627-664). New York, NY: Wiley.
25.
FeldB. C. (1977). Neutralizing inmate violence: Juvenile offenders in institutions (pp. 189-205). Cambridge, MA: Balinger.
26.
FeldmanR. A. (1992). The St. Louis Experiment: Effective treatment of antisocial youths in prosocial groups. In McCordJ.TremblayR.E. (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth to adolescence (pp. 233-252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
GoodsteinL.WrightK. (1991). Inmate adjustment to prison. In GoodsteinL.MacKenzieD. L. (Eds.), The American prison (pp. 299-251). New York, NY: Plenum.
28.
GottfredsonD. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce delinquent behavior. Criminology, 24, 705-731.
29.
GreenbergerE.JosselsonR.KnerrC.KnerrB. (1974). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 127-143.
30.
GrissoT. (2008). Adolescent offenders and mental health. Future of Children, 18(2), 143-164.
31.
GoverA. R.MacKenzieD. L.StyveG. (2000). Boot camps and traditional correctional facilities for juveniles: A comparison of the participants, daily activities, and environments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 53-68.
32.
GoverA. R.MacKenzieD. L.ArmstrongG. S. (2000). Importation and deprivation explanations of juveniles’ adjustment to correctional facilities. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 450-467.
33.
HawkinsS. R.LattimoreP. R.DawesD.VisherC. A. (2009). Re-entry experiences of continued juvenile offenders: Characteristics, service receipt & outcomes of juvenile male participants in the SVORI multi-site evaluation (Document No. 230423). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
34.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84(2), 1109-1130.
35.
HeinemannA. W.FisherW. P.GershonR. (2006). Improving health care quality with outcomes management. Journal of Prosthetic and Orthotics, 18(1S), 46-48.
36.
HorneyJ.OsgoodD. W.MarshallI. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 665-673.
37.
HuizingaD.EsbensenF.WeiharA. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83-118.
38.
InderbitzinM. (2006). Growing up behind bars: An ethnographic study of adolescent inmates in a cottage for violent offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42(3), 1-22.
39.
InnesC. (1997). Patterns of misconduct in the federal prison system. Criminal Justice Review, 22, 157-171.
40.
KarverM. S.HandelsmanJ. B.FieldsS.BickmanL. (2006). Meta-analysis of therapeutic relationship variables in youth and family therapy: The evidence for different relationship variables in the child and adolescent treatment outcome literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 50-65.
41.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experiences as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
KupchikA.SnyderR. B. (2009). The impact of juvenile inmates’ perceptions and facility characteristics on victimization in juvenile correctional facilities. Prison Journal, 89, 265-285.
43.
LambertM. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94-129). New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
LaneD.Lanza-KaduceLFrazierC. E.BishopD. M. (2002). Adult versus juvenile sanctions: Voices of incarcerated youth. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 431-455.
45.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
46.
LipseyM. W. (2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124-147.
47.
LipseyM. W.CullenF. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.
48.
LipseyM. W.HowellJ. C.KellyM. R.ChapmanG.CarverD. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs: A new perspective on evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Center for Juvenile Justice.
49.
LipseyM.WilsonD. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In LoeberR.FarringtonD. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
LipseyM.WilsonD.CothernL. (2000). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
51.
LoughranN.GodfreyK.MengersE. (2010). CJCA Yearbook 2010: A national perspective of juvenile corrections. Braintree, MA: Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators.
52.
LoughranT.MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A.FaganJ.LosoyaS. H.PiqueroA. R. (2009). Estimating a dose-response relationship between length of stay and future recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 47, 699-740.
53.
MacDonaldJ. (1999). Violence and drug use in juvenile institutions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 33-44.
54.
MarshS. C.EvansW. P. (2009). Youth perspectives on their relationships with staff in juvenile correction settings and perceived likelihood of success on release. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 46-67.
MoosR., (1997). Evaluating treatment environments. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
57.
MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A. (in press). Youth in prison and beyond. In FeldB.BishopD. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on juvenile crime and juvenile justice. New York, NY: Oxford.
58.
MulveyE. P.SchubertC. A.ChungH. L. (2007). Service use after court involvement in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 518-544.
59.
MulveyE.SchubertC.OdgersC. (2010). Method for measuring organizational functioning in juvenile justice facilities using resident ratings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1255-1277.
60.
MulveyE. P.SteinbergL.FaganJ.CauffmanE.PiqueroA. R.ChassinL.. . . LosoyaS. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 213-236.
61.
NaginD. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In TonryM. (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 23, pp. 1-42). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
NaginD. (2007). Moving choice to center stage in criminological research and theory: The American Society of Criminology 2006 Sutherland Address. Criminology, 45, 259-272.
63.
OsgoodD. W.BriddellL. O. (2006). “Peer effects in juvenile justice.” In DodgeK.DishionT.LansfordJ. (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 141-161). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
64.
PiagetJ. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
65.
RaudenbushW. A.Xiao-FengL. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency or observations and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387-401.
66.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
67.
SampsonR. (in press). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
68.
SampsonR.MorenoffJ.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
69.
SampsonR.RaudenbushS. (1999). Systematic social observation on public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603-651.
70.
SchubertC.MulveyE. P.SteinbergL.CauffmanE.LosoyaS.HeckerT.. . . KnightG. (2004). Operational lessons from the Pathways to Desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237-255.
71.
SedlakA. J. (2008). Introduction to the Survey of Youth in Residential Placement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
72.
SedlakA. J.McPhersonK. S. (2010). Conditions of confinement: Findings from the Survey of Youth in Residential Placement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
73.
ShermanL. (1993). Criminology and criminalization: Defiance and the science of the criminal sanction. International Annals of Criminology, 31, 79-93.
74.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78-106.
75.
SteinbergL. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review in Clinical Psychology, 5, 47-73.
76.
StreetD.VinterR.PerrowC. (1966). Organization for treatment. New York, NY: Free Press.
77.
SykesG. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
78.
ThomasW. I.ThomasD. (1928). The child in America (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Knopf.
79.
ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.FarnworthM.JangS. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47-83.
80.
WaltersG. D. (2006). Risk-appraisal versus self-report in the prediction of criminal justice outcomes: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 279-304.
81.
WelshW. N. (2000). The effects of school climate on school disorder. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 567, 88-107.
82.
WomackJ. P.JonesD. T. (1996). Beyond Toyota: How to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard Business Review, 74, 140-158.
83.
WrightK. N. (1991). A study of individual, environmental and interactive effects in explaining adjustment in prison. Justice Quarterly, 8, 217-242.
84.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
