With the backdrop of the utility of grit at the individual level, speculation has begun to circulate that grit may exist as an organizational level phenomenon. To explore this potential construct, this study used an exploratory, qualitative research design. This study explored grit at the organizational level by interviewing leaders’ perceptions of what may be a culture of organizational grit. Participants included 14 U.S. military officers. Seven themes emerged relative to the research question: “What do U.S. military officers perceive as a culture of organizational grit?” Themes included professional pride, team unity, resilience-determination, mission accomplishment, core values, growth mindset, and deliberate practice. This study indicated that a culture of organizational grit is likely a combination of converging organizational elements. Overall, findings indicate that there may be a culture of organizational grit in the military and at the least, more research examining the concept is warranted.
AguinisH.BoydB. K.PierceC. A.ShortJ. C. (2011). Walking new avenues in management methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37(2), 395–403.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
4.
BartoneP. T.JohnsenB. H.EidJ.BrunW.LabergJ. C. (2002). Factors influencing small-unit cohesion in Norwegian Navy Officer Cadets. Military Psychology, 14(1), 1–22.
5.
BealD. J.CohenR. R.BurkeM. J.McLendonC. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.
6.
Ben-ShalomU.LehrerZBen-AriE. (2005). Cohesion during military operations: A field study on combat units in Al-Aqsa Intifada. Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 63–79.
7.
BirtL.ScottS.CaversD.CampbellC.WalterF. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811.
8.
BreidahlK. N.HoltugN.KongshøgK. (2017). Do shared values promote social cohesion? If so, which? Evidence from Denmark. European Political Science Review, 10(1), 1–22.
9.
BurkJ. (2008). Military culture. In KurtzL. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of violence, peace and conflict (2nd ed., pp. 1242–1255). Elsevier.
10.
CarrE. C. J.WorthA. (2001). The use of the telephone interview for research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 6(1), 511–524.
11.
CarronA. V.BrawleyL. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106.
12.
CartwrightD. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In CartwrightD.ZanderA. (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 91–109). Harper & Row.
13.
ChenG.KanferR.DeShonR. P.MathieuJ. E.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2009). The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer’s (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 45–55.
14.
ChiocchioF.EssiembreH. (2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research, 40(4), 382–420.
15.
CollinsJ.PorrasJ. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Harper Business.
16.
CredéM. (2018). What shall we do about grit? A critical review of what we know and what we don’t know. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 606–611.
17.
CredéM.TynanM. C.HarmsP. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality of Social Psychology, 113(3), 492–511.
18.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
19.
DanielJ. (2012). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. Sage.
DobbinsG. H.ZaccaroS. J. (1986). The effects of group cohesion and leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction. Group & Organization Studies, 11(3), 203–219.
23.
DuckworthA. L. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner.
24.
DuckworthA. L.GrossJ. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separate determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325.
25.
DuckworthA. L.KirbyT. A.TsukayamaE.BersteinH.EricssonK. A. (2011). Deliberate practice spell success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 2(2), 174–181.
26.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R., (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101.
27.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D., (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.
28.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D.SeligmanM. E. P. (2009). Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 540–547.
29.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RomerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
30.
Eskreis-WinklerL.ShulmanE. P.BealS. A.DuckworthA. L. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school, and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(36), 1–12.
31.
EvansN. J.JarvisP. A. (1980). Group cohesion: A review and reevaluation. Small Group Research, 11(4), 359–370.
32.
FestingerL. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271–282.
GreerL. L. (2012). Group cohesion: Then and now. Small Group Research, 43(6), 655–661.
35.
GriffithJ. (1989). The Army’s new unit personnel replacement and its relationship to unit cohesion and social support. Military Psychology, 1(1), 17–34.
36.
GriffithJ. (2002). Multilevel analysis of cohesion’s relation to stress, well-being, identification, disintegration, and perceived combat readiness. Military Psychology, 14(3), 217–239.
37.
GriffithJ. (2007). Further consideration concerning the cohesion-performance relation in military settings. Armed Forces & Society, 34(1), 138–147.
38.
GriffithJ. (2012). Cohesion forgotten? Redux 2011—Knowns and unknowns. In SaloM.SinkkoR. (Eds.), The science of unit cohesion—Its characteristics and impacts (pp. 11–32). Military Sociological Society of Finland: National Defence University.
39.
GrossN.MartinW. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546–554.
40.
HochanadelA.FinamoreD. (2015). Fixed and growth mindset in education and how grit helps students persist in the face of adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 11(1), 47–50.
41.
HoggM. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York University Press.
42.
IonA.MinduA.GorbănescuA. (2017). Grit in the workplace: Hype or ripe?Personality and Individual Difference, 111, 163–168.
43.
JordanS. L.FerrisG. R.HochwarterW. A.WrightT. A. (2019). Toward a work motivation conceptualization of grit in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 44(2), 320–360.
44.
JordanS. L.WihlerA.HochwarterW. A.FerrisG. R. (2019). The roles of grit in human resource theory and research. In BuckleyM. R.HalbeslebenJ. R. B.WheelerA. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 37, pp. 53–88). Emerald Group.
45.
KäihköI. (2018a). Broadening the perspective on military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 571–586.
46.
KäihköI. (2018b). Introduction to the Armed Forces & Society forum on broadening the perspective on military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 563–570.
47.
KäihköI.HaldénP. (2020). Full-spectrum social science for a broader view on cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 46(3), 517–522.
48.
KellyD. R.MatthewsM. D.BartoneP. T. (2014). Grit and hardiness as predictors of performance among West Point Cadets. Military Psychology, 26(4). 327–342.
49.
KilmannR. H.SaxtonM. J.SerpaR. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture. Jossey-Bass.
50.
KingA. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 493–512.
51.
KingA. (2007). The existence of group cohesion in the armed forces: A response to Guy Siebold. Armed Forces & Society, 33(4), 638–645.
52.
KirkeC. (2009). Group cohesion, culture, and practice. Armed Forces & Society, 35(4), 745–753.
53.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236.
54.
KleinK. J.TosiH.CannellaA. A. (1999). Multilevel theory building: Benefits, barriers, and new developments. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 243–248.
55.
KlenkeK. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Emerald Group.
56.
LeeT. H.DuckworthA. L. (2018). Organizational grit. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 98–105.
57.
LehrkeJ. P. (2014). A cohesion model to assess military arbitration of revolutions. Armed Forces & Society, 40(1), 146–167.
58.
LencioniP. M. (2002). Make your values mean something. Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 113–117.
59.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G (1985). Naturalist inquiry. Sage.
60.
LosekeD. R. (2017). Methodological thinking: Basic principles of social research design. Sage.
61.
MacCounR. J.KierE.BelkinA. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 646–654.
62.
MaddiS. R.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R.VillarrealB. J.GundersenK. K.SavinoS. C. (2017). The continuing role of hardiness and grit on performance and retention in west point cadets. Military Psychology, 29(5), 355–358.
63.
MaddiS. R.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R.VillarrealB. J.WhiteM. (2012). The role of hardiness and grit in predicting performance and retention of US–MA Cadets. Military Psychology, 24(1), 19–28.
64.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
65.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
66.
MillerR.ReinkeS. J. (2007). Military leadership and culture. In WeberJ. A.EliassonJ. (Eds.). Handbook of military administration (pp. 283–300). Taylor & Francis Group.
67.
MooradianT.MatzlerK.UzelacB.BauerF. (2016). Perspiration and inspiration: Grit and innovativeness as antecedents of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 232–243.
68.
MorgesonF. P.HofmannD. A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 249–265.
69.
MurphyM. C.DweckC. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 283–296.
70.
NilssonM. (2018). Primary unit cohesion among the Peshmerga and Hezbollah. Armed Forces & Society, 44(4), 647–665.
71.
PateA. N.PayakachatN.HarrellT. K.PateK. A.CaldwellD. J.FranksA. M. (2017). Measurement of grit and correlation to student pharmacist academic performance. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 81(6), 105.
72.
RedmondS. A.WilcoxS. L.CampbellS.KimA.FinneyK.BarrK.HassanA. M. (2015). A brief introduction to the military workplace culture. Work, 50(1), 9–20.
73.
RimfeldK.KovasY.DaleP. S.PlominR. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 780–789.
74.
Robertson-KraftC.DuckworthA. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predicts effectiveness and retention among novice teachers. Teacher College Record (1970), 116(3), 1–27.
75.
RosaG. A.EstradaA. X.DeCostanzaA. H. (2015). Cohesion with large collectives: A multiteam systems perspective. In VesseyW. B.EstradaA. X. (Eds.), Team cohesion: Advances in psychological theory, methods and practice (Research on managing groups and teams, Vol. 17, pp. 25–52). Emerald Group.
76.
SalasE.GrossmanR.HughesA. M.CoultasC. W. (2015). Measuring team cohesion: Observations from the science. Human Factors, 57(3), 365–374.
77.
ScheinE. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
78.
SchieferD.van der NollJ. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132, 579–603.
79.
SchmidtF. T. C.LechnerC. M.DannerD. (2020). New wine in an old bottle? A facet-level perspective on the added value of grit over BFI-2 conscientiousness. PLoS ONE, 15(2), 1–25.
80.
SevertJ. B.EstradaA. X. (2015). On the function and structure of group cohesion. In VesseyW. B.EstradaA. X. (Eds.), Team cohesion: Advances in psychological theory, methods and practice (Research on managing groups and teams, Vol. 17, pp. 3–24). Emerald Group.
81.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.
82.
ShilsE. (1950). Primary groups in the American army. In MertonR. K.LazarsfeldP. F. (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of “The American Solider” (pp. 16–39). Free Press.
83.
SieboldG. L. (2007). The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33(2), 286–295.
84.
SieboldG. L. (2015). The misconceived construct of task cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 41(1), 163–167.
85.
SieboldG. L. (2020). New body of cohesion research at the macrolevel. Armed Forces & Society, 46(2), 342–348.
86.
SutcliffeK. M.VogusT. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In CameronK. S.DuttonJ. E.QuinnR. E. (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). Berrett-Koehler.
WardP.HodgesN. J.StarkesJ. L.WilliamsA. M. (2007). The road to excellence: Deliberate practice and the development of expertise. High Ability Studies, 18(2), 119–153.
89.
WengrafT. (2006). Qualitative research interview. Sage.
90.
WhettenD. A.FelinT.KingB. G. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35(3), 537–563.
91.
WilliamsJ.BrownJ. M.BrayR. B.Anderson GoodellE. M.Rae OlmstedK.AdlerA. B. (2016). Unit cohesion, resilience, and mental health of soldiers in basic combat training. Military Psychology, 28(4), 241–250.
92.
WongLKolditzT. A.MillenR. A.PotterT. M. (2003). Why they fight: Combat motivation in the Iraq war. Strategic Studies Institute.
93.
YammarinoF. J.DansereauF. (2011). Multilevel issues in organizational culture and climate research. In AshkanaskyN. M.WilderomC. P. M.PetersonM. F. (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 50–76). Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
