Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This corpus-based study provides a baseline of complex word usage patterns in the spontaneous speech of English preschool children to ascertain the characteristics of their derivative vocabulary before literacy development affects language skills. Frequencies of suffixed derivatives produced by (N = 243) children aged 2–5 and their caregivers were extracted for 58 suffix variants, yielding 558 types from the former and 1,364 from the latter. Between the youngest and oldest groups, 11 suffix categories increased significantly in type frequency, compared with 22 in the caregiver dataset. All derivative types were classified for transparency of meaning and simplicity of form on a five-point analysability scale. Around 59% of both the child and caregiver derivative vocabulary sets were classified as transparent regardless of age, suggesting that the potential analysability of the preschool child’s input remains surprisingly invariant over time. The study provides baseline data for future studies on the development of morphological awareness in English-speaking schoolchildren.

Keywords

Corpus linguistics derivational morphology preschool children spontaneous speech transparency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambridge

Kidd

Rowland

C. F.

Theakston

A. L.

(2015). The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 42, 239–273.

Anglin

J. M.

(1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, v–165.

Baayen

R. H.

(2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Lüdeling

Kytö

(Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 899–919). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bauer

(1983). English word-formation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bauer

Lieber

Plag

(2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Berko

(1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

Nagy

Carlisle

(2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic and morphological awareness in Grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163.

Bishop

D. V. M.

(1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

BNCweb. (2013, November). CQP-Edition (Version 4.3). Retrieved from https://bncweb.lancs.ac.uk/

10.

Booij

(2006). Inflection and derivation. In Brown

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 654–661). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

11.

Brown

(1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Carlisle

(1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

13.

Clark

E. V.

(1981). Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words. In Deutsch

(Ed.), The child’s construction of language (pp. 299–328). London, England: Academic Press.

14.

Clark

E. V.

(1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Clark

E. V.

(2014). Acquisition of derivational morphology. In Lieber

Štekauer

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (pp. 424–439). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

16.

Clark

E. V.

Cohen

(1984). Productivity and memory for newly formed words. Journal of Child Language, 11, 611–625.

17.

Clark

E. V.

Hecht

B. F.

(1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 1–24.

18.

Cunningham

A. J.

Carroll

J. M.

(2015). Early predictors of phonological and morphological awareness and the link with reading: Evidence from children with different patterns of early deficit. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 509–531.

19.

Deacon

S. H.

Bryant

(2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. Developmental Science, 8, 583–594.

20.

Deacon

S. H.

Whalen

Kirby

J. R.

(2011). Do children see the danger in dangerous? Grade 4, 6 and 8 children’s reading of morphologically complex words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 467–481.

21.

Demuth

(2008). Exploiting corpora for language acquisition research. In Behrens

(Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research: Finding structure in data (pp. 199–205). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

22.

Derwing

B. L.

Baker

W. J.

(1986). Assessing morphological development. In Fletcher

Garman

(Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (2nd ed., pp. 326–338). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

23.

de Villiers

J. G.

de Villiers

. (1973). A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 267–278.

24.

Dickinson

D. K.

Tabors

P. O.

(2001). Beginning literacy and language: Young children learning at home and at school. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

25.

Freyd

Baron

(1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 310–332.

26.

Gordon

(1989). Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 519–530.

27.

Hoff

Naigles

(2002). How children use input in acquiring a lexicon. Child Development, 73, 418–433.

28.

Laws

Ryder

(2014). MorphoQuantics. Available from http://morphoquantics.co.uk/

29.

Laws

Ryder

(2018). Register variation in spoken British English: The case of verb-forming suffixation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(1), 1–27.

30.

Lieber

(2004). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Lieber

(2005). English word-formation processes. Observations, issues, and thoughts on future research. In Štekauer

Lieber

(Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 375–427). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

32.

Lyster

S. A. H.

Lervåg

A. O.

Hulme

(2016). Preschool morphological training produces long-term improvements in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29, 1269–1288.

33.

MacWhinney

(2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

Marshall

C. R.

van der Lely

H. K. J.

(2007). Derivational morphology in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 42, 71–91.

35.

McBride-Chang

Wagner

R. K.

Muse

Chow

B. W.-Y.

Shu

(2005). The role of morphological awareness of children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435.

36.

Moats

L. C.

Smith

(1992). Derivational morphology: Why it should be included in language assessment and instruction. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 312–319.

37.

Raban

(1988). The spoken vocabulary of five-year old children. Reading, UK: Reading and Language Information Centre, University of Reading.

38.

Schleppegrell

M. J.

(2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Schmid

H.-J.

(2011). English morphology and word-formation. An introduction. Berlin, Germany: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

40.

Siegel

D. I.

(1974). Topics in English morphology. New York, NY: Garland.

41.

Slobin

(1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the acquisition of grammar. In Ferguson

C. A.

Slobin

D. I.

(Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 173–208). New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

42.

Stein

(2007). A dictionary of English affixes: Their function and meaning. München, Germany: LINCOM Studies in English Linguistics, LINCOM EUROPA Academic Publications.

43.

Swan

D. W.

(2000). How to build a lexicon: A case study of lexical errors and innovations. First Language, 20, 187–204.

44.

Tyler

Nagy

(1989). The acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.25 MB

0.31 MB

0.00 MB

Profiling complex word usage in the speech of preschool children: Frequency patterns and transparency characteristics

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material