Children’s adherence to gender stereotypes can be detrimental, yet interventions to tackle stereotyping have achieved mixed success. Few studies have examined interventions developed collaboratively by educators and researchers, and the impact of interventions that focus on increasing perceived similarities between genders has yet to be tested. The present study evaluated an intervention among 6- to 10-year-old British children (47 boys; 37 girls) compared to a control group (61 boys; 47 girls). Led by their class teacher via weekly 30-minute lessons, over a four-month period, children learned to identify and challenge stereotypes, and explored similarities between genders and diversity within gender (e.g., not all girls like pink). Key measures of gender flexibility in relation to toy play, occupations, and perceived similarity to gender groups were utilised. After controlling for baseline scores, the intervention group felt more similar to the other gender and reported that they could do a wider range of occupations in the future. Those who showed less flexibility around toy play at baseline were more flexible after the intervention. Boys in the intervention group reported that gender stereotypes were more unfair than did the control group. Findings are discussed in relation to theories of gender stereotyping and intervention research.
AboudF. E.TredouxC.TroppL. R.BrownC. S.NiensU.NoorN. M. (2012).
Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review,
32, 307–336. doi:10.1016/J.DR.2012.05.001
2.
AndrewsN. C.MartinC. L.GallagherA. M. (2016).
On the association between self- reported own-and other-gender similarity and the use of physical and relational aggression in sixth grade children. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
45, 1817–1826. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0685-z
3.
AubryS.RubleD. N.SilvermanL. B. (1999). The role of gender knowledge in children's gender-typed preferences. In BalterL.Tamis-LeMondaC. S. (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 363–390).
Psychology Press.
4.
BeelmannA.HeinemannK. S. (2014).
Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,
35, 10–24. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002
5.
BemS. (1981).
Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review,
88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
6.
BiernatM.KobrynowiczD. (1999). A shifting standards perspective on the complexity of gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping. In. SwannW. B., Jr LangloisJ. H.GilbertL. A. (. Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of janet taylor spence. (p. 75–106).
American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10277-004
7.
BiglerR. S. (1999). Psychological interventions designed to counter sexism in children: Empirical limitations and theoretical foundations. In SwannW.B.LangloisJ.H.GilbertL.A. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 129–151).
American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10277-006
8.
BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (2007).
Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children's social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
16, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x
9.
BlakemoreJ. E. O.CentersR. E. (2005).
Characteristics of boys' and girls' toys. Sex Roles,
53, 619–633. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0
10.
BusseyK.PerryD. G. (1982).
Same-sex imitation: The avoidance of cross-sex models or the acceptance of same-sex models?Sex Roles,
8, 773–784. doi:10.1007/BF00287572
11.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2016). Researcher–practitioner partnerships in the development of intervention to reduce prejudice among children. In DurkinK. H. R.Schaffer (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of developmental psychology in practice: Implementation and impact (pp. 341–365).
Wiley.
12.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings.
Rand McNally.
13.
CoyleE. F.LibenL. S. (2016).
Affecting girls’ activity and job interests through play: The moderating roles of personal gender salience and game characteristics. Child Development,
87, 414–428. doi:10.1111/cdev.12463
14.
CramerD.HowittD. L. (2004). The SAGE dictionary of statistics: A practical resource for students in the social sciences.
SAGE.
15.
CvencekD.MeltzoffA. N.GreenwaldA. G. (2011).
Math–gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development,
82, 766–779. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
16.
EganS. K.PerryD. G. (2001).
Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology,
37, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451
17.
FabesR. A.MartinC. L.HanishL. D. (2019).
Gender integration and the promotion of inclusive classroom climates. Educational Psychologist,
54, 271–285. doi:10.1080/00461520.2019.1631826
18.
FieldR. D.MartinC. L.AndrewsN. C.EnglandD. E.ZosulsK. M. (2017).
The influence of gender-based relationship efficacy on attitudes toward school. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly,
63, 396–422. doi:10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.63.3.0396
19.
FroehlichL.OlssonM. I.DorroughA. R.MartinyS. E. (2020).
Gender at work across nations: Men and women working in male‐dominated and female‐dominated occupations are differentially associated with agency and communion. Journal of Social Issues,
76, 484–511. doi:10.1111/josi.12390
20.
GaldiS.CadinuM.TomasettoC. (2014).
The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls' math performance. Child Development,
85, 250–263. doi:10.1111/cdev.12128
21.
GerbnerG. (1998).
Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society,
1, 175–194. doi:10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855
22.
GottfredsonL. S. (1981).
Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
28, 545–579. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545
23.
JussimL.CainT. R.CrawfordJ. T.HarberK.CohenF. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 199–227).
Psychology Press.
24.
KingR. A.ScottK. E.RennoM. P.ShuttsK. (2020).
Counterstereotyping can change children’s thinking about boys’ and girls’ toy preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
191, 104753. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104753
25.
LambL. M.BiglerR. S.LibenL. S.GreenV. A. (2009).
Teaching children to confront peers’ sexist remarks: Implications for theories of gender development and educational practice. Sex Roles,
61, 361–382. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9634-4
26.
LeaperC. (2015). Gender and social-cognitive development. In R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), L. S. Liben, & U. Muller (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed.), Vol. 2: Cognitive processes (pp. 806–853). Wiley.
27.
LeaperC.BiglerR. S. (2018). Societal causes and consequences of gender-typing of children's toys. In WeisgramE. S.DinellaL. M. (Eds.), Gender-typing of children’s toys: How early play experiences impact development (p. 287–308).
American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0000077-013
28.
LemanP. J.TenenbaumH. R. (2011).
Practising gender: Children's relationships and the development of gendered behaviour and beliefs. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology,
29, 153–157. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02032.x
29.
LemanP. J.TenenbaumH. R. (Eds.). (2014). Current issues in developmental psychology. Gender and development.
Psychology Press.
30.
LobelT. E.GruberR.GovrinN.Mashraki-PedhatzurS. (2001).
Children's gender-related inferences and judgments: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology,
37, 839–846. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.6.839
31.
MartinC. L.FabesR. A.HanishL. D.GaertnerB.MillerC. F.FosterS.UpdegraffK. A. (2017).
Using an intergroup contact approach to improve gender relationships: A case study of a classroom-based intervention. The Wiley Handbook of Group Processes in Children and Adolescents, 435–454.
32.
MartinC. L.RubleD. (2004).
Children's search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
13, 67–70. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x
33.
MartinC. L.RubleD. N. (2010).
Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology,
61, 353–381. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511
34.
MeyerM.GelmanS. A. (2016).
Gender essentialism in children and parents: Implications for the development of gender stereotyping and gender-typed preferences. Sex Roles,
75, 409–421. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0646-6
35.
MillerC. F.LuryeL. E.ZosulsK. M.RubleD. N. (2009).
Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Developmental and gender differences in children. Sex Roles,
60, 870–881. doi:10.1007%2Fs11199-009-9584-x
36.
MillerC. F.TrautnerH. M.RubleD. N. (2006). The role of gender stereotypes in children’s preferences and behavior. In BalterL.Tamis-LeMondaC. S. (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 293–323).
Psychology Press.
OlezeskiC. L.PariseauE. M.BamatterW. P.TishelmanA. C. (2020).
Assessing gender in young children: Constructs and considerations. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity,
7, 293–303. doi:10.1037/sgd0000381
39.
OlssonM.MartinyS. E. (2018).
Does exposure to counterstereotypical role models influence girls’ and women’s gender stereotypes and career choices? A review of social psychological research. Frontiers in Psychology,
9, 2264. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02264
40.
PahlkeE.BiglerR. S.MartinC. L. (2014).
Can fostering children's ability to challenge sexism improve critical analysis, internalization, and enactment of inclusive, egalitarian peer relationships?Journal of Social Issues,
70, 115–133. doi:10.1111/josi.12050
41.
PfeiferJ. H.BrownC. S.JuvonenJ. (2007).
Prejudice reduction in schools teaching tolerance in schools: Lessons learned since brown v. Board of education about the development and reduction of children's prejudice. Social Policy Report,
21, 1–24.
42.
RubleD. N.MartinC.BerenbaumS. (2006). Gender development. In. EisenbergN. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, personality and social development (pp. 858–932).
Wiley.
SchuetteC. T.PontonM. K.CharltonM. L. (2012).
Middle school children's career aspirations: Relationship to adult occupations and gender. The Career Development Quarterly,
60, 36–46. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00004.x.
45.
SerbinL. A.SprafkinC. (1986).
The salience of gender and the process of sex typing in three- to seven-year-old children. Child Development,
57, 1188–1199. doi:10.2307/1130442
46.
ShermanA. M.ZurbriggenE. L. (2014). “
Boys can be anything”: Effect of barbie play on girls’ career cognitions. Sex Roles,
70, 195–208. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0347-y
47.
ShinH.RyanA. M. (2014a).
Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology,
50, 2462–2472. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0037922
48.
ShinH.RyanA. M. (2014b).
Friendship networks and achievement goals: An examination of selection and influence processes and variations by gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
43, 1453–1464. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0132-9
49.
SignorellaM. L.BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1993).
Developmental differences in children's gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review,
13, 147–183. doi:10.1006/drev.1993.1007
50.
SpinnerL.CameronL.CalogeroR. (2018).
Peer toy play as a gateway to children’s gender flexibility: The effect of (counter) stereotypic portrayals of peers in children’s magazines. Sex Roles,
79, 314–328. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0883-3
51.
TenenbaumH. R.WinstoneN. E.LemanP. J.AveryR. E. (2020).
How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,
112, 1303–1319. doi:10.1037/edu0000436
52.
TrautnerH. M.RubleD. N.CyphersL.KirstenB.BehrendtR.HartmannP. (2005).
Rigidity and flexibility of gender stereotypes in childhood: Developmental or differential?Infant and Child Development,
14, 365–381. doi:10.1002/icd.399
53.
VerveckenD.HannoverB.WolterI. (2013).
Changing (S) expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children's perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
82, 208–220. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.008
54.
VickersA. J.AltmanD. G. (2001).
Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.),
323, 1123–1124. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
WeisgramE. S.FulcherM.DinellaL. M. (2014).
Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children's toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,
35, 401–409. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.06.004
57.
WoodsS. A.HampsonS. E. (2010).
Predicting adult occupational environments from gender and childhood personality traits. The Journal of Applied Psychology,
95, 1045–1057. doi:10.1037/a0020600
58.
ZemoreS. E.FiskeS. T.KimH.-J. (2000). Gender stereotypes and the dynamics of social interaction. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 207–241).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
59.
ZosulsK. M.RubleD. N.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.ShroutP. E.BornsteinM. H.GreulichF. K. (2009).
The acquisition of gender labels in infancy: Implications for gender-typed play. Developmental Psychology,
45, 688–701. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0014053
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
