Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-01
Enacted Support’s Links to Negative Affect and Perceived Support Are More Consistent With Theory When Social Influences Are Isolated From Trait Influences
Social support theory typically explains perceived support’s link to mental health as reflecting the role of specific supportive actions (i.e., enacted support).Yet enacted support typically is not linked to mental health and perceived support as predicted by theory. The links are examined among enacted support, affect, and perceived support when links reflected (a) aspects of support and affect that generalized across relationship partners and time (i.e., trait influences) and (b) aspects that reflected specific relationship partners (i.e., social influences). Multivariate generalizability analyses indicated that enacted support was linked to low negative affect as predicted by theory only when correlations reflected social influences. When correlations reflected trait influences, enacted support was linked to high negative affect. Furthermore, perceived and enacted support were strongly linked when correlations reflected social influences but not trait influences. Thus, findings for enacted support fit social support theory better when social influences were isolated from trait influences.
Barrera, M., Jr. ( 1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-455.
2.
Barrera, M., Sandler, I.N., & Ramsay, T.B. ( 1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435-447.
3.
Barry, R., Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. ( 2007). Links among attachment dimensions, affect and the self for broadly-generalized attachment styles and relationship-specific bonds . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 240-253.
4.
Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. ( 2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458-475.
5.
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R.C. ( 2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 953-961.
6.
Brennan, R.L. ( 2001a). Generalizability theory. New York : Springer.
7.
Brennan, R.L. ( 2001b). Manual for mGENOVA, Version 2.1 (Occasional Paper No. 50). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs .
8.
Brewin, C.R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J.D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748-766.
9.
Campbell, L., Simpson, J.A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D.A. ( 2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510-531.
10.
Cohen, S., & Hoberman, H.M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99-125.
11.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. ( 1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis . Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
12.
Collins, N.L., & Feeney, B.C. ( 2002). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053-1073.
13.
Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements:Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Cutrona, C.E., & Russell, D.W. ( 1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason , I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York: John Wiley.
15.
Eastwick, P.W., Finkel, E.J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. ( 2008). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18, 317-319.
16.
Finch, J.F. ( 1998). Social undermining, support satisfaction, and affect: A domain-specific lagged effects model. Journal of Personality , 66, 315-334.
17.
Finch, J.F., Barrera, M., Jr., Okun, M.A., Bryant, W.H.M., Pool, G.J., & Snow-Turek, L. (1997). The factor structure of received social support: Dimensionality and the prediction of depression and life satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 16, 323-342.
18.
Finch, J.F., Okun, M.A., Pool, G.J., & Ruehlman, L.S. (1999). A comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress . Journal of Personality, 67, 581-621.
19.
Gable, S.L., Reis, H.T., Impett, E.A., & Asher, E.R. ( 2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.
20.
Gleason, M.E.J., Iida, M., Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. ( 2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824-838.
21.
Haber, M.G., Cohen, J.L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B.B. ( 2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 133-144.
22.
Kenny, D. ( 1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis . New York: Guilford.
23.
Kenny, D.A., & Winquist, L.A. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lakey, B. (in press). Social-clinical approaches to social support suggest new strategies for intervention. In J. E. Maddux & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology. New York: Guilford.
26.
Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. ( 2000). Social support theory and selecting measures of social support. In S. Cohen, L. U. Gordon, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and interventions: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29-52). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Lakey, B., & Cronin A. ( 2008). Low social support and major depression: Research, theory and methodological issues. In K. S. Dobson & D. Dozois (Eds.), Risk factors for depression (pp. 385-408). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
Lakey, B., & Drew, J.B. ( 1997). A social-cognitive perspective of social support. In G. R. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. G. Sarason, & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 107-140). New York: Plenum.
29.
Lakey, B., & Heller, K. ( 1988). Social support from a friend, perceived support and social problem solving. American Journal of Community Psychology , 16, 811-825.
30.
Lakey, B., & Scoboria, A. ( 2005). Trait and social influences in the links between perceived social support and mental health. Journal of Personality, 73, 361-388.
31.
Lemay, E.P., Jr., & Clark, M.S. ( 2008). How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 647-671.
32.
Merlo, L., & Lakey, B. ( 2007). Trait and social influences in the links among adolescent attachment, coping, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 195-206.
33.
Mooney, C.Z., & Duval, R.D. ( 1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
34.
Neely, L.C., Lakey, B., Cohen, J.L., Barry, R., Orehek, E., Abeare, C.A., et al. (2006). Trait and social processes in the link between social support and affect: An experimental laboratory investigation . Journal of Personality, 74, 1015-1046.
35.
Penley, J.A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J.S. ( 2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551-603.
36.
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, I.G., & Sarason, B.R. ( 1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1023-1039.
37.
Rini, C., Dunkel Schetter, C., Hobel, C.J., Glynn, L.M., & Sand-man, C.A. (2006). Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13, 207-229.
38.
Seidman, G., Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. ( 2006). Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spuriousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 52-65.
39.
StataCorp. (2003). Stata statistical software (Release 8) [Computer software and manual]. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
40.
Stice, E. ( 2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825-848.
41.
Strube, M.J. ( 2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In G. G. Laurence & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 23-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42.
Thoits, P.A. ( 1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416-423.
43.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Carey, G. ( 1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 97, 346-353.
44.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., McIntyre, C.W., & Hamaker, S. ( 1992). Affect, personality, and social activity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1011-1025.
45.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
46.
Wills, T.A., & Shinar, O. ( 2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention (pp. 86-135). New York: Oxford University Press.
