Social support is typically thought to protect people from bad events, whereas capitalization support augments people’s reactions to good events. Because social support and capitalization support apply to different classes of events, most theory predicts that measures of perceived support and capitalization support should be empirically distinct. We tested a new theory that hypothesizes that the main effects between perceived support and mental health do not reflect stress and coping primarily, but instead reflect ordinary, yet affectively consequential conversations and shared activities, some of which include positive events. According to this view, perceived support and capitalization support should be substantially correlated, should have similar links to other constructs, and their links to favorable affect should overlap, yet not be completely redundant. In three samples, results were consistent with the new theory, when correlations reflected social influences. When correlations reflected trait influences, perceived and capitalization support showed greater overlap.
Barrera, M., Jr. ( 1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-455.
2.
Barry, R., Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. ( 2007). Links among attachment dimensions, affect and the self for broadly-generalized attachment styles and relationship-specific bonds . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 240-253.
3.
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R.C. ( 2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961.
4.
Branje, S.J.T., van Aken, M.A.G., & van Lieshout, C.F.M. (2002). Relational support in families with adolescents. Journal of Family Psychology , 16, 351-362.
5.
Brennan, R.L. ( 2001a). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer.
6.
Brennan, R.L. ( 2001b). Manual for mGENOVA, Version 2.1 (Occasional Paper No. 50). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs.
7.
Brewin, C.R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J.D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 748-766.
8.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. ( 1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis . Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
9.
Cronbach, L.J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York, NY: John Wiley.
10.
Cutrona, C.E., & Russell, D.W. ( 1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason , I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York, NY: John Wiley.
11.
Finch, J.F. ( 1998). Social undermining, support satisfaction, and affect: A domain-specific lagged effects model. Journal of Personality , 66, 315-334.
12.
Gable, S.L. ( 2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175-222.
13.
Gable, S.L., Gonzaga, G., & Strachman, A. ( 2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904-917.
14.
Gable, S.L., & Reis, H.T. ( 2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (vol. 42, pp. 195-257). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
15.
Gable, S.L., Reis, H.T., Impett, E.A., & Asher, E.R. ( 2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.
16.
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.C. ( 2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
17.
Haber, M.G., Cohen, J.L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B.B. ( 2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 133-144.
18.
Kenny, D. ( 1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis . New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. ( 2006). Analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
Lakey, B. ( 2010). Social support: Basic research and new strategies for intervention. In J. E. Maddux & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 177-194). New York, NY : Guildford.
21.
Lakey, B., Adams, K., Neely, L.Rhodes, G., Lutz, C.J., & Sielky, K. ( 2002). Perceived support and low emotional distress: The role of enacted support, dyad similarity and provider personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1546-1555.
22.
Lakey, B., & Cassady, P.B. ( 1990). Cognitive processes in perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 337-343.
23.
Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. ( 2000). Social support theory and selecting measures of social support. In S. Cohen, L. U. Gordon, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and interventions: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29-52). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
24.
Lakey, B., & Cronin A. ( 2008). Low social support and major depression: Research, theory and methodological issues. In K. S. Dobson & D. Dozois (Eds.), Risk factors for depression (pp. 385-408). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Lakey, B., McCabe, K., Fisicaro, S., & Drew, J. ( 1996). Personal and environmental determinants of social support: Three generalizability studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1270-1280.
26.
Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. (in press). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived support and mental health. Psychological Review.
27.
Lakey, B., Orehek, E., Hain, K.L., & VanVleet, M. ( 2010). Enacted support’s link to negative affect and perceived support are more consistent with theory when social influences are isolated from trait influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 36, 132-142.
28.
Lakey, B., Ross, L.T., Butler, C., & Bentley, K. ( 1996). Making social support judgments: The role of similarity and conscientious. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology , 15, 283-304.
29.
Lakey, B., & Scoboria, A. ( 2005). The relative contribution of trait and social influences to the links among perceived social support, affect, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 73, 361-388.
30.
Lazarus, R.S. ( 1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. ( 1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
32.
Lutz, C.L., & Lakey, B. ( 2001). How people make support judgments: Individual differences in the traits used to infer supportiveness in others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1070-1079.
33.
Merlo, L., & Lakey, B. ( 2007). Trait and social influences in the links among adolescent attachment, coping, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 195-206.
34.
Mooney, C.Z., & Duval, R.D. ( 1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
35.
Pierce, G.R., Sarason, I.G., & Sarason, B.R. ( 1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1023-1039.
36.
Reis, H.T., Smith, S.M., Carmichael, C.L., Caprariello, P.A., Tsai, F., Rodrigues, A., & Maniaci, M.R. ( 2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 311-329.
37.
Strube, M.J. ( 2000). Reliability and generalizability theory. In G. G. Laurence & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 23-66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
Thoits, P.A. ( 1985). Social support and psychological well-being: Theoretical possibilities. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and application (pp. 51-72). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
39.
Thoits, P.A. ( 1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416-423.
40.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Carey, G. ( 1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 97, 346-353.
41.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
