Close relationships and self-regulation are inextricably intertwined, yet many of the details regarding how interpersonal processes influence self-regulation are not well understood. To gain a better understanding of this link, we investigated the association between attachment styles and self-regulatory mode orientations. According to regulatory mode theory, locomotors are concerned with initiating goal-directed movement, whereas assessors are concerned with appraising potential means and goals. We predicted that the presence of an attachment figure with whom one has an anxious attachment would be associated with higher assessment tendencies. In addition, we predicted that the presence of an attachment figure with whom one has an avoidant attachment would be associated with lower locomotion tendencies. Five studies (N = 1,434) supported our predictions, and demonstrated that attachment styles and self-regulatory mode orientations covary across interaction partners.
AinsworthM. D. S.BleharM. C.WatersE.WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AvnetT.HigginsE. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 525-530.
3.
BaldwinM. W.CarrellS. E.LopezD. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
4.
BaldwinM. W.HolmesJ. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1087-1098.
5.
BarryR. A.LakeyB.OrehekE. (2007). Links among attachment dimensions, affect, the self, and perceived support for broadly generalized attachment styles and specific bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 340-353.
6.
BartzJ. A.LydonJ. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389-1401.
7.
BelskyJ.CassidyJ. (1994). Attachment: Theory and evidence. In RutterM.HayD. (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians (pp. 373-402). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1960). Separation anxiety. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 89-113.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
BrennanR. L. (2001a). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer.
13.
BrennanR. L. (2001b). Manual for mGENOVA (Version 2.1) (Iowa Testing Programs Occasional Papers No. 50). Iowa City: Iowa Testing Programs.
14.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 520-531.
15.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On the serf-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053-1073.
17.
CookW. L. (2000). Understanding attachment security in family context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 285-294.
18.
DrakeK.BelskyJ.FearonR. M. (2014). From early attachment to engagement with learning in school: The role of self-regulation and persistence. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1350-1361.
19.
ElliotA. J.ReisH. T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 317-331.
20.
FeeneyB. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631-648.
21.
FeeneyB. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 268-285.
22.
FeeneyB. C.ThrushR. L. (2010). Relationship influences on exploration in adulthood: The characteristics and function of a secure base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 57-76.
23.
FeeneyB. C.Van VleetM. (2010). Growing through attachment: The interplay of attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 226-234.
24.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP.HanrahanM. (1994). Assessing adult attachment: Developments in the conceptualization of security and insecurity. In SperlingM. B.BermanW. H. (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 128-152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
FitzsimonsG. M.BarghJ. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 148-164.
26.
FitzsimonsG. M.FinkelE. J. (2010). Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 101-105.
FitzsimonsG. M.FriesenJ.OrehekE.KruglanskiA. W. (2009). Progress-induced goal shifting. In ForgasJ.BaumeisterR.TiceD. (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 183-197). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
FraleyR. C.HeffernanM. E.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships—Relationship structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615-625.
30.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (1997). Adult attachment and the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1080-1091.
31.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1198-1212.
32.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154.
33.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365.
34.
GillathO.MikulincerM.FitzsimonsG. M.ShaverP. R.SchachnerD. A.BarghJ. A. (2006). Automatic activation of attachment-elated goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1375-1388.
35.
GreenJ. D.CampbellW. K. (2000). Attachment and exploration in adults: Chronic and contextual accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 452-461.
36.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
37.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1990). Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 270-280.
38.
HeckhausenJ.DweckC. S. (1998). Motivation and self-regulation across the life span. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
40.
HigginsE. T.KleinR.StraumanT. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3, 51-76.
41.
HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W.PierroA. (2003). Regulatory mode: Locomotion and assessment as distinct orientations. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 293-344). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
44.
KruglanskiA. W.OrehekE.HigginsE. T.PierroA.ShalevI. (2010). Modes of self regulation: Assessment and locomotion as independent determinants in goal-pursuit. In HoyleR. (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 374-402). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
45.
KruglanskiA. W.PierroA.HigginsE. T.CapozzaD. (2007). “On the move” or “staying put”: Locomotion, need for closure, and reactions to organizational change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1305-1340.
46.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashM. N.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815.
47.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M.CouchmanC. E.DeciE. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367-384.
48.
LearyM. R. (2004). The sociometer, self-esteem, and the regulation of interpersonal behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1-62.
50.
LedgerwoodA.ShroutP. E. (2011). The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1174-1188.
51.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
52.
Littman-OvadiaH.OrenL.LavyS. (2013). Attachment and autonomy in the workplace: New insights. Journal of Career Assessment, 21, 502-518.
53.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83.
54.
MikulincerM.OrbachI.IavnieliD. (1998). Adult attachment style and affect regulation: Strategic variations in subjective self-other similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 436-448.
55.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97-115.
56.
MischelW.AydukO.BermanM. G.CaseyB. J.GotlibI. H.JonidesJ.. . . ShodaY. (2011). “Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252-256.
57.
MooneyC. Z.DuvalR. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
58.
OrehekE. (in press). Goal pursuit and close relationships: A people as means perspective. In KopetzC.FishbachA. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface: From the lab to the real world. Oxford, UK: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
59.
OrehekE.ForestA. L. (2016). When people serve as means to goals implications of a motivational account of close relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(2), 79-84.
60.
OrehekE.MauroR.KruglanskiA. W.van der BlesA. M. (2012). Prioritizing association strength versus value: The influence of self-regulatory modes on means evaluation in single goal and multigoal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 22-31.
61.
PierroA.GiacomantonioM.PicaG.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (2011). On the psychology of time in action: Regulatory mode orientations and procrastination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1317-1331.
62.
PierroA.OrehekE.KruglanskiA. W. (2009). Let there be no mistake! On assessment mode and the transference effect in social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 879-883.
63.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A.OriñaM. M. (1999). Attachment and anger in an anxiety-provoking situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 940-957.
65.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Vol. 1, pp. 308-313). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
66.
ShahJ. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.
67.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434-446.
68.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.OriñaM. M.GrichJ. (2002). Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598-608.
69.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899-914.
70.
TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 454-458.
71.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692-700.
72.
TuckmanB. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 473-480.
73.
WilliamsL. J.O’BoyleE. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 233-242.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
