The resurgence of right-wing political parties across the globe raises questions about the origins of national identity. Based on the Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice, we argue that people’s tendency to submit to ingroup authorities (Right-Wing Authoritarianism [RWA]) and preference for group-based hierarchy (Social Dominance Orientation [SDO]) underlie people’s belief in the superiority of their nation (nationalism) and attachment to their homeland (patriotism). We examine these hypotheses using three waves of data from an annually conducted national longitudinal panel study of New Zealanders (N = 3,838). As predicted, RWA had positive cross-lagged effects on nationalism and patriotism. Conversely, SDO had a positive cross-lagged effect on nationalism, but a negative cross-lagged effect on patriotism. Little evidence of reciprocal cross-lagged effects (i.e., national identity on authoritarianism) was found. These results demonstrate that nationalism and patriotism are related, albeit distinct, ways of identifying with one’s nation that are ultimately rooted in authoritarianism.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
2.
ArielyG. (2012). Globalization, immigration and national identity: How the level of globalization affects the relations between nationalism, constructive patriotism and attitudes toward immigrants?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 539-557. doi:10.1177/1368430211430518
3.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324-340. doi:10.1002/per.746
4.
BalabanisG.DiamantopoulosA.MuellerR. D.MelewarT. C. (2001). The impact of nationalism, patriotism and internationalism on consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 157-175. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490943
5.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2016). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12660
6.
BerryJ. W. (2013). Research on multiculturalism in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 663-675. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.005
7.
BilewiczM.SoralW.MarchlewskaM.WiniewskiM. (2017). When authoritarians confront prejudice. Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate-speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38, 87-99. doi:10.1111/pops.12313
8.
BlankT.SchmidtP. (2003). National identity in a united Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24, 289-312. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00329
9.
BonannoG. A.JostJ. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311-323. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2804_4
10.
BremerC. (2010, December14). French far-right star compares praying Muslims to Nazi occupiers. Reuters. Available from http://blogs.reuters.com
11.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
12.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
13.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
14.
CitrinJ.JohnstonR.WrightM. (2012). Do patriotism and multiculturalism collide? Competing perspectives from Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45, 531-552. doi:10.1017/S0008423912000704
15.
DaviesP. G.HutchinsonS.OsborneD.ten BrinkeL.SteeleC. M.MarkusH. R. (2017). International differences in the relationship between foreign threats, national identity, and citizenry’s tolerance for diversity. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M.MarkusH. R. (2008). A nation challenged: The impact of foreign threat on America’s tolerance for diversity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 308-318. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.308
17.
De FigueiredoR. J. P.ElkinsZ. (2003). Are patriots bigots? An inquiry into the vices of in-group pride. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 171-188. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00012
18.
DevosT.BanajiM. R. (2005). American = White?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447-466. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447
19.
DruV. (2007). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 877-883. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.008
20.
DruckmanD. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism, and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective. Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 43-68. doi:10.2307/222610
21.
DuckittJ. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63-84. doi:10.2307/3791588
22.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
23.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696. doi:10.1177/0146167205284282
24.
DuckittJ.FisherK. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00322
25.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113-130. doi:10.1002/per.614
26.
DuckittJ.WagnerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
27.
EndersC. K.BandalosD. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430-457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
28.
FeshbachS. (1987). Individual aggression, national attachment, and the search for peace: Psychological perspectives. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 315-325. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1987)13:5<315::AID-AB2480130508>3.0.CO;2-4
29.
GrimmK. J.RamN.EstabrookR. (2017). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
30.
GuimondS.DambrunM.MichinovN.DuarteS. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
31.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102-116. doi:10.1037/a0038889
32.
HardingJ. F.SibleyC. G.RobertsonA. (2011). New Zealand = Māori, New Zealand = bicultural: Ethnic group differences in a national sample of Māori and Europeans. Social Indicators Research, 100, 137-148. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9608-5
33.
HightonB. (2009). Revisiting the relationship between educational attainment and political sophistication. Journal of Politics, 71, 1564-1576. doi:10.1017/S0022381609990077
34.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E.. . . StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of Social Dominance Orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003-1028. doi:10.1037/pspi0000033
35.
HuddyL.KhatibN. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 63-77. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00237.x
36.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
37.
KennyD. A.ZautraA. (2001). Trait–state models for longitudinal data. In CollinsL. M.SayerA. G. (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243-263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10409-008
38.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257-274. doi:10.2307/3791647
39.
LiQ.BrewerM. B. (2004). What does it mean to be an American? Patriotism, nationalism, and American identity after 9/11. Political Psychology, 25, 727-739. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00395.x
40.
LittleT. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
41.
McArdleJ. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577-605. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
42.
McCannS. J. H. (1997). Threatening times, “strong” presidential popular vote winners, and the victory margin, 1824–1964. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 160-170. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.160
MummendeyA.KlinkA.BrownR. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out-group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159-172. doi:10.1348/014466601164740
45.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
46.
OsborneD.Lees-MarshmentJ.van der LindenC. (2016). National identity and the flag change referendum: Examining the latent profiles underlying New Zealanders’ flag change support. New Zealand Sociology, 31(7), 19-47.
47.
ParkerC. S. (2010). Symbolic versus blind patriotism: Distinction without difference?Political Research Quarterly, 63, 97-114. doi:10.1177/1065912908327228
48.
PehrsonS.BrownR.ZagefkaH. (2009). When does national identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist in-group definitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 61-76. doi:10.1348/014466608X288827
49.
PeñaY.SidaniusJ. (2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tale of asymmetry. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 782-790. doi:10.1080/00224540209603936
50.
PerryR.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116-127. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004
51.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
52.
PrattoF.StallworthL. M.Conway-LanzS. (1998). Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1853-1875. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01349.x
53.
RabinowitzJ. L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effects of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20, 1-24. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00135
54.
RoetsA.AuE. W. M.Van HielA. (2015). Can authoritarianism lead to greater liking of out-groups? The intriguing case of Singapore. Psychological Science, 26, 1972-1974. doi:10.1177/0956797615605271
55.
RothiD. M.LyonsE.ChryssochoouX. (2005). National attachment and patriotism in a European nation: A British study. Political Psychology, 26, 135-155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00412.x
56.
SalesS. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 420-428. doi:10.1037/h0033157
57.
SchatzR. T.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151-174. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00140
SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (2009). Ubiquity of whiteness in majority group national imagination: Australian = White, but New Zealander does not. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61, 119-127. doi:10.1080/00049530802239300
60.
SibleyC. G.HoverdW. J.DuckittJ. (2011). What’s in a flag? Subliminal exposure to New Zealand national symbols and the automatic activation of egalitarian versus dominance values. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 494-516. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.503717
61.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H. (2007). New Zealand = bicultural? Implicit and explicit associations between ethnicity and nationhood in the New Zealand context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1222-1243. doi:10.1002/ejsp.459
62.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H.KhanS. S. (2008). Who are “we”? Implicit associations between ethnic and national symbols for Maori and Pakeha in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 38-49.
63.
SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2016). Ideology and post-colonial society. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 115-161. doi:10.1111/pops.12323
64.
SidaniusJ.PetrocikJ. R. (2001). Communal and national identity in a multiethnic state. In AshmoreR. D.JussimL.WliderD. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict and conflict resolution (pp. 101-127). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
66.
SkitkaL. J. (2005). Patriotism or Nationalism? Understanding post-September 11, 2001, flag-display behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1995-2011. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02206.x
67.
SpryC.HornseyM. (2007). The influence of blind and constructive patriotism on attitudes toward multiculturalism and immigration. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 151-158. doi:10.1080/00049530701449489
68.
StaerkléC.SidaniusJ.GreenE. G. T.MolinaL. E. (2010). Ethnic minority-majority asymmetry in national attitudes around the world: A multilevel analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 491-519. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00766.x
69.
StaubE. (1997). Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. In Bar-TalD.StaubE. (Eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 213-228). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
70.
StellmacherJ.PetzelT. (2005). Authoritarianism as a group phenomenon. Political Psychology, 26, 245-274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00417.x
71.
WagnerU.BeckerJ. C.ChristO.PettigrewT. F.SchmidtP. (2012). A longitudinal test of the relation between German nationalism, patriotism, and outgroup derogation. European Sociological Review, 28, 319-332. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq066
72.
WagnerU.ChristO.HeitmeyerW. (2010). Anti-immigration bias. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 361-377). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
73.
WilliamsR. L.FosterL. N.KrohnK. R. (2008). Relationship of patriotism measures to critical thinking and emphasis on civil liberties versus national security. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 139-156. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00165.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
