Although religiosity correlates positively with authoritarianism, the temporal ordering of this relationship is unclear. Because religious teachings often promote authoritarian values, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) should increase following religious conversion. Yet spiritual beliefs may also promote egalitarianism. As such, social dominance orientation (SDO) might decrease postconversion. We tested these hypotheses using data from a subset of participants who converted to Christianity at some point during a 9-year longitudinal panel study (N = 536). We also examined a separate subsample who deconverted over the same period (N = 696). As hypothesised, RWA was stable before conversion, but increased slightly after becoming religious. Unexpectedly, SDO was stable both pre- and postconversion. Conversely, those who deconverted from Christianity experienced declines in RWA both before and after losing their religion, whereas SDO declined only postdeconversion. These results suggest that religious conversion precedes increases in RWA (but not SDO), and that declines in RWA precede deconversion.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
2.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press
3.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
5.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
BatsonC. D.VentisW. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.
8.
BulbuliaJ. (2004). Religious costs as adaptations that signal altruistic intention. Evolution and Cognition, 10, 19–38.
9.
ChirumboloA. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00062-9
10.
DallagoF.CimaR.RoccatoM.RicolfiL.MirisolaA. (2008). The correlation between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: The moderating effects of political and religious identity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802502333
11.
DjupeP. A.CalfanoB. R. (2013). Religious value priming, threat, and political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 768–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912471203
12.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Elsevier.
13.
DuckittJ. (2009). Authoritarianism and dogmatism. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 298–317). The Guilford Press.
14.
DuckittJ.BizumicB.KraussS. W.HeledE. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism–conservatism–traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x
15.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
GennerichC.HuberS. (2006). Value priorities and content of religiosity—New research perspectives. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1163/008467206777832508
18.
GlockC. Y.StarkR. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally.
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353415
20.
GranqvistP. (2003). Attachment theory and religious conversions: A review and a resolution of the classic and contemporary paradigm chasm. Review of Religious Research, 45, 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512581
21.
HammondM. D.MilojevP.HuangY.SibleyC. G. (2018). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617727588
22.
HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A. (2012). When ingroups aren’t “in”: Perceived political belief similarity moderates religious ingroup favoritism. PLoS ONE, 7, Article e50945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050945
23.
HirshJ. B.WalbergM. D.PetersonJ. B. (2013). Spiritual liberals and religious conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612444138
24.
HoodR. W.Jr.ChenZ. (2013). Conversion and deconversion. In BullivantS.RuseM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of atheism (pp. 537–549). Oxford University Press.
25.
HoverdW. J.SibleyC. G. (2010). Religious and denominational diversity in New Zealand 2009. New Zealand Sociology, 25(2), 59.
26.
JostJ. T.HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A.HennesE. P.SternC.GoslingS. D.GrahamJ. (2014). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033220
27.
KilpatrickD. G.SutkerL. W.SutkerP. B. (1970). Dogmatism, religion, and religiosity, a review and re-evaluation. Psychological Reports, 26, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1970.26.1.15
28.
KruglanskiA. W.PierroA.MannettiL.De GradaE. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84
29.
LeakG. K.RandallB. A. (1995). Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: The role of religious maturity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386769
30.
LeoneL.ChirumboloA.DesimoniM. (2012). The impact of the HEXACO personality model in predicting socio-political attitudes: The moderating role of interest in politics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.049
31.
LiviS.LeoneL.FalgaresG.LombardoF. (2014). Values, ideological attitudes and patriotism. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.040
32.
LockhartC.SibleyC. G.OsborneD. (2020). Religion makes—and unmakes—the status quo: Religiosity and spirituality have opposing effects on conservatism via RWA and SDO. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2019.1607540
33.
LovelandM. T. (2003). Religious switching: Preference development, maintenance, and change. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00168
34.
MahoneyA.PargamentK. I. (2004). Sacred changes: Spiritual conversion and transformation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20007
35.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.CohenA. B.MillerD. T. (2011). Religiosity and social welfare: Competing influences of cultural conservatism and prosocial value orientation. Journal of Personality, 79(4), 763–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00705.x
36.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
37.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x
38.
NeyrinckB.LensW.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2010). Updating Allport’s and Batson’s framework of religious orientations: A reevaluation from the perspective of self-determination theory and Wulff’s social cognitive model. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(3), 425–438.
39.
OsborneD.SatherleyN.LittleT. D.SibleyC. G. (2021). Authoritarianism and social dominance predict annual increases in generalized prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620969608
40.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2014). Endorsement of system-justifying beliefs strengthens the relationship between church attendance and right-wing authoritarianism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213507322
41.
OsborneD.WootonL.SibleyC. G. (2013). Are liberals agreeable or not? Politeness and compassion differentially predict political conservatism via distinct ideologies. Social Psychology, 44, 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000132
42.
PaloutzianR. F.RichardsonJ. T.RamboL. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67, 1047–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00082
43.
PargamentK. I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_2
44.
PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.SeliP.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
45.
PerezS.VallièresF. (2019). How do religious people become atheists? Applying a grounded theory approach to propose a model of deconversion. Secularism and Nonreligion, 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.108
46.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499937
47.
RobertsonA. (2006). In search of a theoretical explanation for the relationship between religiosity and prejudice among self-identified Christians [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
48.
RosenbergB. D.SiegelJ. T. (2020). Reactance and spiritual possibilities: An application of psychological reactance theory. In VailK. E.RoutledgeC. (Eds.), The science of religion, spirituality, and existentialism (pp. 67–82). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817204-9.00006-8
49.
SagioglouC.ForstmannM. (2013). Activating Christian religious concepts increases intolerance of ambiguity and judgment certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.003
50.
SaroglouV. (2002). Beyond dogmatism: The need for closure as related to religion. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 5, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670210144130
51.
SaroglouV. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: A five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352322
52.
SaroglouV. (2015). Personality and religion. In WrightJ. D.BerryJ. W.RobertsR. D. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 801–808). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.25080-0
53.
SaroglouV.CorneilleO.van CappellenP. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610902880063
54.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005
55.
SaroglouV.Muñoz-GarcíaA. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00393.x
56.
SatherleyN.MilojevP.GreavesL. M.HuangY.OsborneD.BulbuliaJ.SibleyC. G. (2015). Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. PLoS ONE, 10, Article e0121950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121950
ShafferB. A.HastingsB. M. (2007). Authoritarianism and religious identification: Response to threats on religious beliefs. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 10, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/13694670500469949
59.
ShenM. J.HaggardM. C.StrassburgerD. C.RowattW. C. (2013). Testing the love thy neighbor hypothesis: Religiosity’s association with positive attitudes toward ethnic/racial and value-violating out-groups. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033648
60.
SherkatD. E. (2001). Tracking the restructuring of American religion: Religious affiliation and patterns of religious mobility, 1973–1998. Social Forces, 79, 1459–1493. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0052
61.
SherkatD. E.WilsonJ. (1995). Preferences, constraints, and choices in religious markets: An examination of religious switching and apostasy. Social Forces, 73, 993–1026. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580555
SibleyC. G.AfzaliM. U.SatherleyN.EjovaA.StrongeS.YogeeswaranK.GrimshawM.HawiD.MirnajafiZ.BarlowF. K.MilojevP.GreavesL. M.KapeliS.ZubielevitchE.HamleyL.BasabasM. C.WuM. H.HowardC.LeeC. H. J.. . . BulbuliaJ. (2020). Prejudice toward Muslims in New Zealand: Insights from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study. New Zealand Journal of Psychology (Online), 49, 48–72.
64.
SibleyC. G.BulbuliaJ. (2015). Charity explains differences in life satisfaction between religious and secular New Zealanders. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 5, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599x.2014.899509
65.
SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.HoA. K.SibleyC.DuriezB. (2013). You’re inferior and not worth our concern: The interface between empathy and social dominance orientation. Journal of Personality, 81, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12008
66.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
67.
SilviaP. J.NusbaumE. C.BeatyR. E. (2014). Blessed are the meek? Honesty–humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of religious beliefs, motives, and values. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.043
68.
StangorC.LearyS. P. (2006). Intergroup beliefs: Investigations from the social side. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38005-7
69.
StreibH.HoodR. W.KellerB.CsöffR.-M.SilverC. F. (2009). Research in contemporary religion: Vol. 5. Deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
70.
StrongeS.BulbuliaJ.DavisD. E.SibleyC. G. (2020). Religion and the development of character: Personality changes before and after religious conversion and deconversion. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620942381
71.
Van CappellenP.CorneilleO.ColsS.SaroglouV. (2011). Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2011.556995
72.
Van TongerenD. R.DeWallC. N.ChenZ.SibleyC. G.BulbuliaJ. (2021). Religious residue: Cross-cultural evidence that religious psychology and behavior persist following deidentification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000288
73.
VilaythongO.LindnerN. M.NosekB. A. (2010). “Do unto others”: Effects of priming the golden rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ attitudes toward gay people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01524.x
WinkP.DillonM.PrettymanA. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00361.x
76.
WisneskiD. C.LytleB. L.SkitkaL. J. (2009). Gut reactions: Moral conviction, religiosity, and trust in authority. Psychological Science, 20, 1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02406.x
77.
YsseldykR.MathesonK.AnismanH. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
