This research investigates whether unit power affects interunit
knowledge transfer. We propose that units are more likely to transfer their
knowledge to other units with more critical, nonsubstitutable, and central
knowledge because the latter have greater unit power upon the former. Findings
from two firms reveal that differences in knowledge criticality and
nonsubstitutability predict the degree of power one unit has upon another.
However, only findings from one firm supported the mediating effect of unit power
on knowledge transfer from a source to a seeker, suggesting that the role of unit
power in affecting interunit knowledge transfer may be contingent on the degree of
goal interdependence among units.
Alvesson, M.1993. Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge-intensive
firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of
Management Studies , 30(6):
997-1015.
2.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P.2000. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive
advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes , 82(1):
150-169.
3.
Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R.2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: Creating,
retaining, and transferring knowledge. Management
Science, 49(4): v-viii.
Astley, W.G., & Sachdeva, P.S.1984. Structural sources of intraorganizational power: A
theoretical synthesis. Academy of Management
Review , 9(1):
104-113.
6.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A.1986. The moderator—mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical
considerations . Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51:
1173-1182.
7.
Blau, P.M.1964. Exchange and power in social life.
London:
Wiley.
8.
Borgatti, S.P., & Cross, R.2003. A relational view of information seeking and
learning in social networks. Management Science,
49(4):
432-445.
9.
Brass, D.J., & Burkhardt, M.E.1992. Centrality and power in organizations . In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and
action: 191-215. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard Business School
Press.
10.
Collins, C.J., & Smith, K.G.2006. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of
human resource practices in the performance of high-technology
firms. Academy of Management Journal,
49(3):
544-560.
11.
Crozier, M.1964. The bureaucratic phenomenon.
Chicago : University of Chicago
Press.
12.
Darr, E.D., & Kurtzberg, T.R.2000. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions
on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 82(1):
28-44.
13.
Emerson, R.M.1962. Power—dependence relations.
American Sociological Review, 27:
31-41.
14.
Freeman, L.C.1979. Centrality in social networks—Conceptual
clarification . Social Networks,
1, 215-239.
15.
Gresov, C., & Stephens, C.1993. The context of interunit influence
attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly,38(2):
252-276.
16.
Gupta, A.K., & Govindarajan, V.1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within
multinational corporations. Academy of Management
Review, 16(4):
768-792.
Hansen, M.T.1999. The search—transfer problem: The role of weak ties
in sharing knowledge across organization subunits.
Administrative Science Quarterly,44: 82-111.
Hansen, M.T., Mors, M.L., & Lovas, B.2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple
networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management
Journal, 48(5):
776-793.
21.
Harpaz, I., & Meshoulman, I.1997. Intraorganizational power in high technology
organizations. The Journal of High Technology Management
Research, 8(1):
107-128.
22.
Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R., Lee, C.A., Schneck, R.E., & Pennings, J.M.1971. A strategic contingencies' theory of
intraorganizational power. Administrative Science
Quarterly,16(2):
216-229.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.J., & Wolf, G.1984. Estimating within group interrater reliability with
and without response bias. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 69:
85-98.
25.
Krackhardt, D.1988. Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple
regression analysis of dyadic data. Social
Networks, 10,
359-381.
26.
Krackhardt, D.1990. Assessing the political landscape: Structure,
cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative
Science Quarterly,35(2):
342-369.
27.
Lachman, R.1989. Power from what? A reexamination of its
relationship with structural conditions. Administrative
Science Quarterly,34(2):
231-251.
28.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W.1967. Organization and environment.
Boston : Harvard
University.
29.
Medcof, J.W.2001. Resource-based strategy and managerial power in
networks of internationally dispersed technology units.
Strategic Management Journal, 22,
999-1012.
30.
Molm, L.D.1990. Structure, action, and outcomes: The dynamics of
power in social exchange. American Sociological
Review, 55(3):
427-447.
31.
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P.2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary
power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of
International Business Studies, 35,
385-406.
32.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S.1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the
organizational advantage. Academy of Management
Review, 23(2):
242-266.
33.
Pfeffer, J.1981. Power in organizations.
Marshfield, MA:
Pitman.
34.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R.1978. The external control of organizations .
New York: Harper and
Row.
35.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B.2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The
effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science
Quarterly,48, 240-267.
36.
Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J.1974. The bases and use of power in organizational
decision making: The case of a university. Administrative
Science Quarterly,19(4),
453-473.
37.
Schulz, M.2001. The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational
learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management
Journal, 44(4):
661-681.
38.
Singh, J.2005. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge
diffusion patterns. Management Science,
51(5):
756-771.
39.
Szulanski, G.1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the
transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic
Management Journal (Winter Special Issue), 17,
27-43.
40.
Szulanski, G.2000. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic
analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 82(1),
9-27.
41.
Tsai, W.2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the
formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic
Management Journal , 21,
925-939.
42.
Tsai, W.2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:
Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation
and performance. Academy of Management Journal,
44(5), 996.
43.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S.1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of
intrafirm networks. Academy of Management
Journal, 41(4),
464-476.
44.
Tushman, M.L.1977. A political approach to organizations: A review and
rationale . Academy of Management Review,
2(2):
206-216.
