Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The non-uniform structures of coal deposits make potential well distribution on the coal surface inhomogeneous. Deep potential wells adsorb methane molecules more easily than shallow potential wells. The methane adsorption heat release differs according to the depths of the potential wells. During isobaric adsorption, the adsorption heat in the high-temperature stage is significantly higher than that in the low-temperature stage. A lower adsorption pressure results in greater adsorption heat variation during a temperature increase. During the isothermal adsorption process, the adsorption heat is higher in the low-pressure stage, with the preferential adsorption characteristics of deep potential wells.

Keywords

Adsorption potential well adsorption heat adsorption pressure temperature isobaric adsorption isothermal adsorption

Introduction

An adsorption potential well refers to a location with lower potential energy on the coal surface, which exhibits methane adsorption ability (Gürdal and Yalcin, 2001; Wang et al., 1996, 2013). The adsorption potential well depth is related to the mutual attraction between coal and methane (Ma et al., 2011a, 2011b). Owing to the variety of the oxygen-containing functional groups (Lu et al., 2014; Zhong, 2004) and side chains on the coal surface (Liu and Feng, 2012; Zhou et al., 2017a), as well as the fractal characteristics of coal surface morphology (Liu et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2017b), the methane adsorption potential wells on natural coal surfaces exhibit obvious heterogeneity (Karacan, 2000; Wang, 2000). Similar to potential energy, adsorption sites with different adsorption capacities form rough equipotential adsorption potential surfaces (Fu et al., 2005). The sunken part is known as the potential well, and the depression potential energy is referred to as the potential well depth (Figure 1). Obviously, the depth of the potential wells (−ε) on the coal surface is inhomogeneous. By means of molecular simulation, Jiang et al. (2007) found that the methane adsorption capacities of the various oxygen functional groups and side chains differ, and their potential well depths range from 4 to 9 kJ/mol. Certain experimental measurements of the methane adsorption heat values were 0–30 kJ/mol (Guo and Wu, 2008; Lui et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2004). According to the experiment conducted by Zhao et al. (2011), the methane adsorption amount in coal is highly sensitive to temperature variation at 303–543 K. These phenomena indicate that there are not only certain adsorption potential wells with depths far greater than the methane molecule energy, but also numerous adsorption potential wells with depths close to the methane molecule energy in coal. From calculations, Nie and Duan (1998) found that the potential well depth on the coal surface agrees with the experimentally measured adsorption heat values.

Figure 1.

Equipotential line of solid surface.

Coalbed methane (CBM) is an unconventional natural gas that exists in coal reservoirs. Methane adsorption in coal is dependent on two factors: the adsorption potential well parameters (potential well depth and number of potential wells) and methane gas state parameters (such as adsorption pressure and temperature). CBM thermal recovery technology has been developed in recent years. In the CBM thermal recovery process, the variation rules of the methane adsorption heat of coal are not clear, which makes accurate evaluation of CBM thermal recovery efficiency challenging. Therefore, the variation law of the adsorption heat of methane and coal with inhomogeneous potential wells is studied in this paper. This will provide a new theoretical basis and application foundation for the accurate evaluation of CBM enrichment characteristics, CBM production and exploitation efficiency improvement, and popularisation of new methods and technology for CBM exploitation.

Kinetic process of methane adsorption by coal

In 1916, the state equation for monolayer adsorption was deduced by Langmuir, based on statistical thermodynamics (Yan and Zhang, 1979). The temperature-dependent adsorption parameters were obtained as follows $b (T) = b_{m} (T) Exp [- ε / (k T)]$ (1)

Compared to $Exp [- ε / (k T)]$ , Langmuir believed that the temperature dependence of $b_{m} (T)$ could be neglected. According to the assumed condition of the Langmuir equation, the depth of adsorption potential wells is consistent and uniform, so the adsorption rate parameter b(T) is constant during isothermal adsorption; that is, the methane adsorption rates of all potential wells are same. Based on the Langmuir equation, the methane adsorption amount on the coal surface is only dependent on the adsorption pressure p under isothermal conditions. When p tends to 0, the methane adsorption amount tends to 0, while when the p tends to infinity, the methane adsorption amount on the coal surface reaches the same limit, a. Therefore, from equation (1), the following adsorption characteristics of coal with heterogeneous adsorption potential wells can be obtained under isothermal conditions ${\begin{cases} b = b_{m} & - ε < < k T \\ b = + \infty & - ε > > k T \end{cases}$ (2)

Then, substituting b into the Langmuir equation ${\begin{cases} θ = b_{m} p / (1 + b_{m} p) & b = b_{m} \\ θ = 1 & b = + \infty \end{cases}$ (3)

From equations (2) and (3), kT is a constant value under isothermal conditions. Furthermore, the adsorption parameter b of the deep adsorption potential wells ( $- ε > > k T$ ) is infinitely great; that is, the adsorption rate is far greater than the desorption rate, so that the methane desorption can hardly occur when the adsorption pressure decreases. However, the adsorption parameter b of shallow adsorption potential wells ( $- ε > > k T$ ) tends to the minimum b_m; that is, the adsorption rate is far smaller than the desorption rate, so that methane adsorption can hardly occur when the adsorption pressure increases. In these two cases, the sensitivity of the adsorption site coverage to adsorption pressure is very low, which obviously differs from the adsorption characteristics of homogeneous potential wells.

From a microscopic viewpoint, methane adsorption in coal is the process of the potential energy of methane molecules being converted to coal surface energy and thermal energy by means of collisions between the methane molecules and adsorption site. In heterogeneous potential wells, when an adsorption site has a potential well depth that is smaller than the energy of the collided methane molecule, the adsorption site cannot trap the methane molecule, and adsorption cannot occur. However, when an adsorption site has a potential well depth that is larger than the energy of the collided methane molecule, the adsorption site can trap the methane molecule, and adsorption can occur, while the coal surface energy is reduced, and the remaining energy is converted into heat energy and released. Therefore, methane adsorption in coal is an exothermic process. Moreover, as the distributions of potential wells differ, the heat released from the equivalent methane adsorption varies.

Relationship between adsorption site coverage and adsorption heat

During methane adsorption in coal, the coverage of the heterogeneous potential wells on the coal surface mainly depends on the temperature and adsorption pressure. For all adsorption sites with a potential well depth of −ε on the coal surface, the coverage rate θ_-ε is determined by the Langmuir equation $θ_{- ε} = b_{- ε} p / (1 + b_{- ε} p)$ (4)

Substituting equation (1) into equation (4), we obtain $θ_{- ε} = \frac{1}{1 + Exp [\ln (\frac{1}{p b_{m}}) - \frac{1}{k T} (- ε)]}$ (5)

From equation (5), in the coal and methane adsorption equilibrium, the coverage of the potential wells with different depths obeys the law of the logistic (S) curve with the parameters of adsorption pressure p and temperature T. It should be noted that not all of the adsorption potential wells can adsorb methane molecules under conditions of any temperature and pressure (p, T), as illustrated in Figure 2. Under conditions of any temperature and adsorption pressure, deep potential wells (ε = 25–30 kJ/mol) exhibit nearly saturation adsorption, while shallow potential wells can scarcely undergo adsorption, and the coverage of medium-depth potential wells （ε = 5–25 kJ/mol） increases as the depth of the potential wells increases. When the adsorption pressure increases or temperature decreases, the adsorption of the adsorption sites occurs from the deep to shallow potential wells. Conversely, when the adsorption pressure or temperature decreases, methane desorption of the adsorption sites occurs from the shallow to deep potential wells.

Figure 2.

Coverage rate of (a) isothermal and (b) isobaric adsorption at different potential well depths.

Experimental study on adsorption characteristics of heterogeneous potential wells

The test systems for measuring methane adsorption by coal at high temperatures include an inflation device or stable system, precise heating device, adsorption chamber, methane storage cylinder and system for gas measurement. The inflation device or stable system is used to load the methane adsorption container, and the axial pressure is controlled by the stable device. The precise heating device used for heating the adsorption container has an accuracy of 0.1 K and the maximum attainable heat is 873 K. The dimensions of the cylindrical coal mass sample taken from the 3# coal seam (Tunliu mine, Lu'an Mining Area) were 100 mm (diameter) × 150 mm (length). The internal dimensions of the stainless steel absorption container were the same as those of the coal sample, and it was connected to both the methane storage cylinder and gas measurement system by means of a steel pipe with an internal diameter of 4 mm. The experimental system principles are presented in Figure 3. The equipment is thermally stable and can be used in a controlled environment; therefore, very high accuracy is provided by the temperature supply and measurement. The system operates from room temperature (RT) to 573 K.

Figure 3.

Schematic of test system.

In order to study the methane adsorption characteristics in coal with inhomogeneous potential wells, isothermal and isobaric adsorption experiments at different temperatures were carried out by the test systems. Seven different temperature points between 333 and 513 K were set in the experiment. In the isothermal adsorption experiment, methane was injected into the adsorption container at the required pressure after achieving a vacuum. The injection valve was closed and the container was heated at the adsorption equilibrium gas pressure. Each temperature stage lasted for 6 h after achieving the stabilised methane pressure before moving to the next stage. Five gas pressure points were recorded at each temperature point. In the isobaric adsorption experiment, the constant desorption pressure was set after adsorption equilibrium at 333 K, following which methane desorption was carried out under each temperature point. During this process, each temperature point was maintained above 8 h, and the methane desorption equilibrium was reached when the pressure was maintained constant. The methane adsorption amount was calculated by measuring the initial adsorption amount and methane desorption amount under a constant pressure at different temperature points.

Phenomenon of coal-adsorbing methane adsorption in coal with heterogeneous potential wells

The adsorption amount, temperature and adsorption pressure of the isothermal and isobaric adsorption experiments are displayed in Table 1. Firstly, the isothermal adsorption process at different temperatures was analysed. The curve fitting of the isothermal experiment data is displayed in Table 2, based on the Langmuir formula (equation (4)). It is indicated that, in the temperature range from 333 to 513 K, the lean coal adsorption capacity during isothermal methane adsorption increased with an increasing adsorption pressure, and the increasing rate slowed. The adsorption curve is similar to the Langmuir curve. The parameter a represents the maximum value of the methane adsorption amount (L) in coal under different temperature conditions by increasing the adsorption pressure. As opposed to the ideal Langmuir model, the fitting parameter a for the methane adsorption of the natural lean coal with inhomogeneous potential wells decreases with an increasing temperature. It is demonstrated that, at any temperature in this experiment, potential wells with depths less than the methane molecular energy existed on the coal surface, which could not absorb methane molecules by increasing the adsorption pressure. With the temperature increase, the average kinetic energy of the methane molecules increased, and the number of potential wells with depths less than the methane molecule energy increased, so that the maximum coal adsorption capacity (parameter a) decreased.

Table 1.

Adsorption capacity and pressure of methane in coal at different temperatures.

Adsorption conditions	333 (K)		363 (K)		393 (K)		423 (K)		453 (K)		483 (K)		513 (K)
Adsorption conditions	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)	p (MPa)	V (L)
Isothermal adsorption	0.107	2.987	0.21	2.776	0.355	2.51	0.525	2.233	0.714	1.959	0.916	1.696	1.167	1.386
	0.187	3.79	0.336	3.492	0.531	3.142	0.748	2.801	0.988	2.463	1.282	2.076	1.578	1.73
	0.269	4.588	0.473	4.183	0.715	3.76	1.005	3.304	1.319	2.865	1.659	2.436	2.054	1.984
	0.464	6.109	0.763	5.528	1.131	4.893	1.525	4.297	1.973	3.682	2.462	3.074	2.994	2.469
	0.665	7.614	1.066	6.845	1.544	6.032	2.009	5.185	2.684	4.396	3.285	3.678	3.942	2.955
Isobaric adsorption	0.1	2.48	0.1	1.68	0.1	1.22	0.1	0.93	0.1	0.69	0.1	0.49	0.1	0.32
Isobaric adsorption	0.7	9.78	0.7	7.08	0.7	5.28	0.7	4.28	0.7	3.36	0.7	2.48	0.7	1.68

Table 2.

Curve fitting of adsorption capacity and pressure of methane at different temperatures.

Temperature (K)	a (L)	b	R ²
333	32.25806	1.761364	0.9991
363	28.16901	1.112853	0.9947
393	27.17391	0.555053	0.9875
423	21.05263	0.564133	0.9975
453	20.57613	0.343463	0.9943
483	18.01802	0.261916	0.9932
513	16.83502	0.174296	0.9862

The methane adsorption amount variation with the temperature increase in the isobaric adsorption experiment is illustrated in Figure 4. It is indicated that the coal methane adsorption amount decreased with the temperature increase. When the adsorption pressure changed from 0.1 to 0.7 MPa, the adsorption amount variation decreased with the temperature increase; that is, the sensitivity of the methane adsorption amount to the adsorption pressure decreased with an increasing temperature.

Figure 4.

Variation of adsorption capacities with temperature at different adsorption pressures.

This is one of the main reasons for the low efficiency of CBM extraction by means of adsorption pressure reduction. For methane molecules that are tightly bounded in deep potential wells, only changing the methane molecule energy distribution through increasing the temperature by means of the CBM thermal recovery technology can effectively cause their adsorption state to change.

Influence of temperature and adsorption pressure on coal and methane adsorption heat

Owing to the differences in the adsorption sites of potential well depths and coverage priority, the methane adsorption heat in coal varies with changes in the system temperature T and adsorption pressure p. In experimental analysis, the influence of temperature and adsorption pressure on the adsorption heat can be analysed by isobaric and isothermal adsorption experiments, respectively. However, the total number of adsorption sites in a natural coal surface cannot be determined experimentally. Using the data in Table 1, the maximum adsorption amount at 333 K was regarded as the saturated methane adsorption amount. The isothermal and isobaric adsorption processes were curve fitted in stages, respectively, in order to calculate the adsorption heat.

Adsorption heat variation in isobaric adsorption process

The influence of temperature on adsorption heat can be analysed by curve fitting in stages during the isobaric adsorption experiment. As illustrated in Figure 5, the temperature section of the 333 to 423 K was regard as the low-temperature stage of the isobaric adsorption experiment. Conversely, the temperature section of 523 to 513 K was regarded as the high-temperature stage of the isobaric adsorption experiment. From equation (2) $θ_{m} = p b_{m} Exp [- ε / (k T)]$ (6)

Figure 5.

Curve fitting of isobaric adsorption of methane at different temperatures.

Here, $θ_{m} = θ_{- ε} / (1 - θ_{- ε})$ , the curve fittings of the isobaric adsorption experiments are displayed in Table 3, which indicates the high correlation coefficients. At a constant pressure adsorption of 0.1 and 0.7 MPa, the calculated coal and methane adsorption heat ranged from −13.422 to −21.544 kJ/mol, and the adsorption heat in the high-temperature stage was significantly higher than that in the low-temperature stage. It is demonstrated that the average methane adsorption energy was higher in the high-temperature stage during isobaric adsorption, which can only occur in deep potential wells, so that the adsorption heat was higher; the average methane adsorption energy was lower in the low-temperature stage, where adsorption can also occur in shallow potential wells, so that the adsorption heat was lower. Under an adsorption pressure of 0.1 MPa, the adsorption heat change from the high- and low-temperature range was −8.122 kJ/mol. Under an adsorption pressure of 0.7 MPa, the adsorption heat change from the high- and low-temperature range was −6.601 kJ/mol. That is, a lower adsorption pressure results in larger adsorption heat variation during a temperature increase.

Table 3.

Curve fitting of isosteric at different temperatures and adsorption heats.

Adsorption pressure	Temperature range	Curve fitting	R ²	Adsorption heat (kJ/mol)
0.1 MPa	333–423 K	$θ_{- ε} / (1- θ_{- ε}) = 0.0065 \times Exp (1614.3 / T)$	0.9997	−13.422
0.1 MPa	423–513 K	$θ_{- ε} / (1- θ_{- ε}) = 0.0007 \times Exp (2591.1 / T)$	0.9818	−21.544
0.7 MPa	333–423 K	$θ_{- ε} / (1- θ_{- ε}) = 0.0043 \times Exp (1650.4 / T)$	0.9973	−13.722
0.7 MPa	423–513 K	$θ_{- ε} / (1- θ_{- ε}) = 0.0007 \times Exp (2444.3 / T)$	0.9776	−20.323

2. Adsorption heat variation in isothermal adsorption process

The influence of adsorption pressure on adsorption heat can be analysed by the curve fitting in stages of the isothermal adsorption experiment. From equation (4) $\frac{1}{N} = \frac{1}{a b p} + \frac{1}{a}$ (7)

As illustrated in Figure 6, the adsorption pressure section from the first to third measuring points was regarded as the low adsorption pressure stage of the isothermal adsorption experiment. Conversely, the adsorption pressure section from the third to fifth measuring points was regarded as the high adsorption pressure stage of the isothermal adsorption experiment. The adsorption heat of the different adsorption pressure stages can be obtained by substituting the curve fittings and temperature T into equation (1).

Figure 6.

Curve fitting of isothermal adsorption at different adsorption pressures.

The proportionality constant b_m should be determined in the adsorption heat calculation. As a constant that is independent of the temperature and adsorption pressure, b_m can be calculated by curve fitting of the b values (Table 2) under different isothermal conditions and corresponding temperature T. The calculation value of b_m was 0.0032, which was applied to the calculations of the adsorption heat for all isothermal adsorption processes. The curve fitting and calculation results are displayed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Curve fitting of the adsorption capacity and pressure of methane in coal at different temperatures.

Temperature (K)	High-pressure section			Low-pressure section
Temperature (K)	b	−ε (kJ/mol)	R ²	b	−ε (kJ/mol)	R ²
333	2.005	−17.831	0.9922	7.342	−21.424	0.9838
363	0.965	−17.231	0.9959	3.262	−20.906	0.9947
393	0.639	−17.309	0.9938	1.513	−20.123	0.9964
423	0.395	−16.936	0.9974	0.901	−19.837	0.9999
453	0.353	−17.718	0.9997	0.612	−19.788	0.9977
483	0.292	−18.121	0.9975	0.532	−20.535	0.9984
513	0.234	−18.31	0.9958	0.356	−20.096	0.9959

The curve fittings of the isothermal adsorption experiments exhibit high correlation coefficients. In the isothermal adsorption of 333 to 513 K, the calculated coal and methane adsorption heat ranged from 1.686 to 3.593 kJ/mol. Both the adsorption rate b of the coal and methane, and the adsorption heat in the low-pressure stage were significantly larger than that in the high-pressure stage. The differences in the adsorption heat in the different pressure stages ranged from 1.686 to 3.593 kJ/mol. It is indicated that, during isothermal adsorption, owing to the low coverage rate of the adsorption sites, the methane molecules were more likely to adsorb on the adsorption sites with deep potential wells during the low-pressure stage, so that the adsorption heat was higher. With an increase in the adsorption pressure, the coverage rate of the adsorption sites with shallow potential wells increased gradually, resulting in decreased adsorption heat.

Conclusions

For heterogeneous potential wells, methane adsorption in coal exhibits the following characteristics.

In the methane adsorption process, methane molecules prefer to be adsorbed by deep adsorption potential wells, rather than shallow adsorption potential wells. When the adsorption pressure increases or the temperature decreases, the adsorption occurs from the deep to shallow potential wells at the adsorption sites. Conversely, when the adsorption pressure or temperature decreases, methane desorption of the adsorption sites occurs from the shallow to the deep potential wells.

Owing to the heterogeneity of the adsorption potential wells on the coal surface, a smaller adsorption amount results in a greater potential well depth being occupied by the adsorbed methane molecules, and the sensitivity of their adsorption states to adsorption pressure is weakened.

During isobaric adsorption, the adsorption heat in the high-temperature stage is significantly higher than that in the low-temperature stage. A lower adsorption pressure results in greater adsorption heat variation during the temperature increase.

During the isothermal adsorption process, the adsorption heat is higher in the low-pressure stage. As the adsorption pressure increases, the coverage rate of the adsorption sites with shallow potential wells increases gradually, leading to a decrease in the adsorption heat.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,authorship,and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research,authorship,and/or publication of this article: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program No. 21373146),Shanxi scholar support plan,Program for the Outstanding Innovative Teams of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi (2014),and excellent innovation project of graduate students in Shanxi (20150016).

References

Shen

Yao

et al . (2005) Physical Chemistry. Beijing: China Higher Education Press.

Guo L and Wu

(2008) Mechanism of methane’s adsorption on nanometer active carbon at supercritical state. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics 24(5): 737–742.

Gürdal

Yalcin

(2001) Pore volume and surface area of the carboniferous coals from the Zonguldak basin (NWTurley) and their variations with rank and maceral composition. International Journal of Coal Geology 48: 133–144.

Jiang

Cui

Zhang

et al . (2007) The quantum chemical study on different rank coals surface interacting with methane. Journal of China Coal Society 32(3): 293–295.

Karacan

(2000) Assessment of energetic heterogeneity of coals for gas adsorption and its effect on mixture predictions for coalbed methane studies. Fuel 79(15): 1963–1974.

Liu

Feng

(2012) Theoretical study on adsorption heat of methane in coal. Journal of China Coal Society 37(4): 647–653.

Liu Z Zhang Q Yang

(2003) The absorption properties of different coal and changes of the absorption heating. Natural Gas Industry 23(4): 130–131.

Wang

Qin

(2014) Analysis on adsorption capacity and adsorption thermodynamic characteristics of different metamorphic degree coals. Coal Science and Technology 42(6): 130–135.

Jian

Zhang

(2011a) Analysis and application of CBM desorption characteristics at rising temperature. China Coalbed Methane 8(3): 11–15.

10.

Zhang

and Lin Y (2011b) Isothermal adsorption and desorption experiment of coal and experimental results accuracy fitting. Journal of China Coal Society 36(3): 477–480.

11.

Nie

Duan

(1998) The adsorption essence of gas on coal surface. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology 29(4): 417–420.

12.

Wang

Lin

(1996) Occurrence of gas in coal. Coal Engineer 5: 12–19.

13.

Wang

Yang

YS, Wang YD

et al . (2013) Data-constrained modelling of an anthracite coal physical structure with multi-spectrum synchrotron X-ray CT. Fuel 106: 219–225.

14.

Wang

(2000) The Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

15.

Yan

Zhang

(1979) Adsorption and Coagulation (Solid Surface and Hole). Beijing: China Science Press.

16.

Zhang

(2004) The adsorption heat research status of natural gas and hydrogen adsorption storage. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 25(2): 249–253.

17.

Zhao

Feng

et al . (2011) Experiments of methane adsorption on raw coal at 30–270°C. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 34(4): 324–331.

18.

Zhong

(2004) Adsorption capacity of coals and its affecting factors. Earth Science 29(3): 327–334.

19.

Zhou

Feng

Zhao

et al . (2017a) Experimental study of meso-structural deformation of coal during methane adsorption-desorption cycles. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 42: 243–251.

20.

Zhou

Feng

Zhao

et al . (2017b) Experimental meso scale study on the distribution and evolution of methane adsorption in coal. Applied Thermal Engineering 112: 942–951.

Variation law of adsorption heat of methane and coal with inhomogeneous potential well

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Kinetic process of methane adsorption by coal

Relationship between adsorption site coverage and adsorption heat

Experimental study on adsorption characteristics of heterogeneous potential wells

Phenomenon of coal-adsorbing methane adsorption in coal with heterogeneous potential wells

Influence of temperature and adsorption pressure on coal and methane adsorption heat

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References