This article considers how the relationship of everyday spatial practices of digital on-demand, ride-hailing taxi drivers and social imaginaries of urban restructuring remain imbricated in class and religious antagonisms. Through an ethnographic investigation of the intimate neighborhood geographies of exclusion that govern platform work in Delhi, this article provides a richer understanding of how platform urbanism is undergirded by heterogeneous assessments of the material and discursive dimensions of a “world-class” city and re-centers the locally specific antagonisms that are key to articulating norms of urban platform citizenship. To do so, it empirically exposes the contexts wherein platform work produces constructs of order, cleanliness and safety that socio-spatially vilifies low-income, Muslim-majority neighborhoods of Delhi. I argue that the grammar of such exclusionary practices draws on a nexus of factors, namely individual devaluation of platform workers, the pervasive atmosphere of anti-Muslim and anti-poor hatred in Delhi, and the dangers encountered by platform labor. By attending to the complex agency of taxi drivers, this article contributes to an understanding of how platform urbanism is co-constituted with antagonisms, and how contestations over urban restructuring unfold as taxi drivers realign platforms as political imaginations.
AminS (1995) Event, Metaphor, Memory: Chauri Chaura, 1922–1992. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
AnnavarapuS (2022) Risky routes, safe suspicions: Gender, class, and cabs in Hyderabad, India. Social Problems69(3): 761–780.
3.
AttohKWellsKCullenD (2019) We’re building their data: Labor, alienation, and idiocy in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space37(6): 1007–1024.
BaviskarA (2003) Between violence and desire: Space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. International Social Science Journal55: 89–98.
6.
BhanG (2009) This is no longer the city I once knew evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment & Urbanization21(1): 127–142.
7.
BhanG (2013) Planned illegalities: Housing and the “failure” of planning in Delhi: 1947–2010. Economic and Political Weekly48(24): 58–70.
8.
BhanG (2014) The impoverishment of poverty: Reflections on urban citizenship and inequality in contemporary Delhi. Environment & Urbanization26(2): 547–560.
BhuwaniaA (2018) The case that felled a city: Examining the politics of Indian public interest litigation through one case. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal17: 1–25. DOI: 10.4000/samaj.4469.
11.
BissellD (2020) Affective platform urbanism: Changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum115: 102–110.
12.
BorowiakC (2019) Poverty in transit: Uber, taxi coops, and the struggle over Philadelphia’s transportation economy. Antipode51(4): 1079–1100.
13.
ButcherM (2012) Distinctly Delhi: Affect and exclusion in a crowded city. In: EdensorTJayneM (eds) Urban Theory Beyond the West: A World of Cities. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 175–194.
14.
CameronLRahmanHA (2021) (Not) seeing like an algorithm: Managerial control and worker resistance in the platform economy. Academy of Management Proceedings2021(1): 10248.
15.
CardulloPKitchinR (2024) Provincialising platform citizenship: Citizen participation in and Through Civic platforms. No. jdpu3_v1. Center for Open Science.
16.
ChanNKHumphreysL (2018) Mediatization of social space and the case of uber drivers. Media and Communication6(2): 29–38.
17.
ChristinA (2017) Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society4(2): 1–14.
18.
DattaAOdendaalN (2019) Smart cities and the banality of power. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space37(3): 387–392.
19.
DattaniK (2021) Platform ‘glitch as surprise’: The on-demand domestic work sector in Delhi’s National Capital Region. City25(3–4): 376–395.
20.
Del NidoJM (2022) Taxis vs. Uber: Courts, Markets, and Technology in Buenos Aires. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
21.
DupontVD (2011) The dream of Delhi as a global city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 533–554.
22.
EnglandMRSimonS (2010) Scary cities: Urban geographies of fear, difference and belonging. Social & Cultural Geography11(3): 201–207.
FernandesL (2004) The politics of forgetting: Class politics, state power and the restructuring of urban space in India. Urban Studies41(12): 2415–2430.
25.
GandhiA (2016) The language of the crowd: Public congregation in Urban India. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory17(3): 308–315.
26.
GebrialD (2024) Racial platform capitalism: Empire, migration and the making of Uber in London. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space56(4): 1170–1194.
27.
GhertnerDA (2011) Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: Elite governance programs in Delhi: Gentrifying the local state in India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 504–532.
28.
GhertnerDA (2012) Nuisance talk and the propriety of property: Middle class discourses of a slum-free Delhi. Antipode44(4): 1161–1187.
29.
GhertnerDA (2015) Rule by Aesthetics: World-Class City Making in Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30.
GibbingsSL (2022) Gender, mobility and emotional infrastructures: Ikwe Safe Rides in Winnipeg–SI new frontiers. Mobilities17(5): 645–660.
31.
GrahamM (2020) Regulate, replicate, and resist–the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geography41(3): 453–457.
32.
GregoryKMaldonadoMP (2020) Delivering Edinburgh: Uncovering the digital geography of platform labour in the city. Information, Communication & Society23(8): 1187–1202.
33.
HanakataNBignamiF (2023) Platform urbanization, its recent acceleration, and implications on citizenship. The case of Singapore. Citizenship Studies27(2): 189–209.
34.
HardingSRojeshS (2014) Battery rickshaws in New Delhi and the regulation conundrum. Economic & Political Weekly49(35): 43–47.
35.
HeilandH (2021) Controlling space, controlling labour? Contested space in food delivery gig work. New Technology, Work and Employment36(1): 1–16.
36.
HuaJRayK (2021) Spent Behind the Wheel: Drivers’ Labor in the Uber Economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
HussainMS (2023) Learning to strike in the gig economy: Mobilization efforts by food delivery workers in Hyderabad, India. Journal of South Asian Development18(3): 431–456.
38.
JamilG (2014) The capitalist logic of spatial segregation: A study of Muslims in Delhi. Economic & Political Weekly49(3): 52–58.
39.
JamilG (2017) Accumulation by Segregation: Muslim Localities in Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
40.
JohnstonHMommadovaYVallasS, et al. (2023) Delivering difference: ‘unbelonging’ among US platform parcel delivery workers. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society16(2): 303–318.
LeszczynskiAKongV (2022) Gentrification and the an/aesthetics of digital spatial capital in Canadian ‘platform cities.’. The Canadian Geographer66(1): 8–22.
MasseyD (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge, pp. 71–86.
46.
MazumdarR (2001) Figure of the ‘Tapori': Language, gesture and cinematic city. Economic & Political Weekly36(52): 4782–4780.
47.
McFarlaneCSaguinKCunananK (2025) Density textures: The crowd, everyday life, and urban poverty in Manila. Urban Geography46(5): 1222–1241.
48.
MehraD (2009) Campaigning against its eviction: Local trade in new ‘world-class’ Delhi. In: ButcherMVelayuthamS (eds) Dissent and Cultural Resistance in Asia’s Cities. London: Routledge, pp. 148–167.
NairG (2023) The political economy of gig work in the pandemic: Social hierarchies and labour control of Indian platform workers. Journal of South Asian Development18(3): 409–430.
51.
NotarBE (2012) Off limits and out of bounds: Taxi driver perceptions of dangerous people and places in Kunming, China. In: ChenXKannaA (eds) Rethinking Global Urbanism: Comparative Insights from Secondary Cities. London: Routledge, pp. 190–207.
52.
NowakS (2023) The social lives of network effects: Speculation and risk in Jakarta’s platform economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space55(2): 471–489.
53.
PandeyG (1992) The Construction of Communalism in Colonial North India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
54.
ParveenN (2021) Contested homelands: Politics of space and identity. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Publishing.
55.
PetersR (2020) Motorbike-taxi-drivers as infrastructure in the Indonesian city. Ethnos85(3): 471–490.
QadriRD’IgnazioC (2022) Seeing like a driver: How workers repair, resist, and reinforce the platform’s algorithmic visions. Big Data & Society9(2): 1–17.
58.
RamakrishnanK (2013) City futures: Aspirations and urban imaginaries in Delhi. Kaleidoscope: The Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Journal of Durham University’s Institute of Advanced Study5(1): 100–108.
59.
RaoU (2010) Making the global city: Urban citizenship at the margins of Delhi. Ethnos75(4): 402–424.
60.
RaoU (2013) Tolerated encroachment: Resettlement policies and the negotiation of the licit/illicit divide in an Indian metropolis. Cultural Anthropology28(4): 760–779.
61.
RavalNLalvaniS (2022) The moral economy of platform work. Asiascape: Digital Asia9(12): 144–174.
62.
RichardsonL (2020) Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geography41(3): 458–461.
63.
RosenblatA (2019) Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Oakland: University of California Press.
64.
SadanaR (2018) We are visioning it”: Aspirational planning and the material landscapes of Delhi’s metro: Aspirational planning and material landscapes. City & Society30(2): 186–209.
65.
SchindlerS (2014) The making of “world-class” Delhi: Relations between street hawkers and the new middle class. Antipode46(2): 557–573.
66.
SchorJBTirrellCVallasSP (2024) Consent and contestation: How platform workers reckon with the risks of gig labor. Work, Employment and Society38(5): 1423–1444.
67.
ShapiroA (2020) Design, Control, Predict: Logistical Governance in the Smart City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
68.
ShapiroA (2023) Platform urbanism in a pandemic: Dark stores, ghost kitchens, and the logistical-urban frontier. Journal of Consumer Culture23(1): 168–187.
69.
ShieldsR (1991) Places on the Margin: Alternative Geographies of Modernity. London: Routledge.
70.
SrivastavaS (2009) Urban spaces, Disney-divinity and moral middle classes in Delhi. Economic & Political Weekly44(26/27): 338–345.
StehlinJHodsonMMcMeekinA (2020) Platform mobilities and the production of urban space: Toward a typology of platformization trajectories. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space52(7): 1250–1268.
73.
StehlinJPayneW (2023) Disposable infrastructures: ‘micromobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in Austin, Texas. Urban Studies60(2): 274–291.
74.
TurnerS (2020) Informal motorbike taxi drivers and mobility injustice on Hanoi’s streets. Negotiating the curve of a new narrative. Journal of Transport Geography85: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102728.
75.
Wells KatieJAttohKCullenD (2023) Disrupting D.C.: The Rise of Uber and the Fall of the City. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
