The article suggests that the phylogenic basis for contemporary Western artistic practices lies in a social practice of the distinctive features found in the species, as seen in certain birds and mammals. Using the cases of birdsong, ape-paintings, knot-tying in certain orangutans and the intriguing stone-handling of some monkeys, the article shows that the question of non-human artistic practices is not only largely unexplored, but that contemporary ethology and psychology are still incapable of really tackling the problem. More generally, some of the problems encountered stem from the fact that one conception of the social sciences was constructed in opposition to the animal, leaving the study of the latter to biology. In this perspective, the study of artistic activity in non-human animals is a true challenge for the social sciences of the future.
DissanayakeE (1988) What is Art For?Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
3.
DissanayakeE (1992) Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
4.
DissanayakeE (2004) Of caves and humans. In: RothenbergDPryorWJ (eds) Writing the Future: Progress and Evolution. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 73–84.
5.
GroysB (2002/2005) Politique de l’Immortalité. Quatre entretiens avec Thomas Knoefel. Paris: Maren Sell.
6.
HartL (1995) Three walls: Regional aesthetics and the international art world. In: MarcusGMyersF (eds) The Traffic of Culture: Refiguring art and anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
HerzfeldCLestelD (2005) Knot tying in great apes: Etho-ethnology of an unusual tool behavior. Social Science Information sur les Sciences Sociales44(4): 621–652.
8.
HuffmanM (1984) Stone-play of Macaca fuscata in Arashiyama B troop: Transmission of a non-adaptive behavior. Journal of Human Evolution13: 725–735.
9.
HuffmanM (1996) Acquisition of innovative cultural behaviors in nonhuman primates: A case study of stone handling, a socially transmitted behavior in Japanese macaques. In: HeyesCGaleffBjr (eds) Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. New York: Academic Press, 267–289.
LestelD (2006) Ethology as social science, ethology as cognitive science and situated embodied rationality. In: AndlerDOkadaMWatanabeS (eds) Reasoning and Cognition: Interdisciplinary Conference Series on Reasoning Studies, vol. 2. Tokyo: Keio University Press, 221–231.
13.
LestelD (2009) Pensare con l’animale. Discipline Filosofiche19(1): 153–169.
14.
LestelD (2011) What capabilities for animals?Biosemiotics4: 83–102.
15.
LestelDHerzfeldC (2005) Topological ape: Knot tying and untying and the origins of mathematics. In: GrialouPLongoGOkadaM (eds) Images and Reasoning: Interdisciplinary Conference Series on Reasoning Studies, vol.1. Tokyo: Keio University Press, 147–162.
16.
MâcheF-B (2001) Musique au Singulier. Paris: Odile Jacob.
17.
PasztoryE (2005) Thinking with Things: Toward a New Vision of Art. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
18.
TaylorH (2005) Call of the pied butcherbird. AudioWings8(2): 4–8.
19.
TaylorH (2008a) Decoding the song of the pied butcherbird: An initial survey. Transcultural Music Review12: 1–30.
20.
TaylorH (2008b) Towards a Species Songbook: Illuminating the vocalizations of the Australian pied butcherbird (Cracticus nigrogularis). Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney.
21.
TaylorHLestelD (in press) The Australian pied butcherbird and the nature/culture continuum. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies.
22.
VogelS (1997) Baule: African Art, Western Eyes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
