What is the effect of disciplinary codes and codes of ethics on containing corruption in the civil service? We assess whether both tools are effective and whether they interact to reinforce each other. Using a unique survey of central government civil servants from Poland, we find that, where applied in practice, disciplinary and ethics codes reinforce each other to contain kickbacks as one form of corruption in the civil service. By contrast, disciplinary codes and codes of ethics on their own are not strongly associated with kickbacks in central government ministries. The paper concludes that anti-corruption tools work most effectively when managers have multiple consistently implemented tools at their disposal.
BatoryA. (2002). Political cycles and organizational life cycles: Delegation to anticorruption agencies in Central Europe. Governance, 25(4), 639–680.
2.
BazermanM. H.TenbrunselA. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what's right and what to do about it. Princeton University Press.
3.
BeeriI.DayanR.Vigoda-GadotE.WernerS. B. (2013). Advancing ethics in public organizations: The impact of an ethics program on employees’ perceptions and behaviors in a regional council. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 59–78.
4.
BoatengJ.CoxR. W.III. (2016). Exploring the trust question in the midst of public management reforms. Public Personnel Management, 45(3), 239–263.
5.
BorryE. L. (2017). Ethical climate and rule bending: How organizational norms contribute to unintended rule consequences. Public Administration, 95(1), 78–96.
6.
BorryE. L. (2018). Teaching public ethics with TV: Parks and recreation as a source of case studies. Public Integrity, 20(3), 300–315.
7.
BorryE. L.DeHart-DavisL.KaufmannW.MerrittC. C.MohrZ.TummersL. (2018). Formalization and consistency heighten organizational rule following: Experimental and survey evidence. Public Administration, 96(2), 368–385.
8.
BowmanJ. S.KnoxC. C. (2008). Ethics in government: No matter how long and dark the night. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 627–639.
9.
BrehmJ.GatesS. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic responses to a democratic public. University of Michigan Press.
10.
DeHart-DavisL. (2009a). Green tape and public employee rule abidance: Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 901–910.
11.
DeHart-DavisL. (2009b). Green tape: A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361–384.
12.
DemmkeC.MoilanenT. (2010). Effectiveness of ethics and good governance in central administration of EU-27: Evaluating reform outcomes in the context of the financial crisis. Peter Lang.
13.
de SpevilleB. (2010). Anticorruption commissions: The 'Hong Kong Model' revisited. Asia-Pacific Review, 17(1), 47–71.
14.
Garcia-SanchezI.Rodriguez-DominguezL.Gallego-AlvarezI. (2011). Effectiveness of ethics codes in the public sphere: Are they useful in controlling corruption?International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 190–195.
15.
GingerichD. W. (2013). Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: Empirical findings from South America. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 505–540.
16.
GRECO. (2003). Second evaluation round - evaluation report on Poland. Council of Europe.
17.
HassanS.WrightB. E.YuklG. (2014). Does ethical leadership matter in government? Effects on organizational commitment, absenteeism, and willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration Review, 74(3), 333–343.
18.
HubertsL. (2014). The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done, and where we go. Palgrave.
19.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practise of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
20.
KlitgaardR. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
21.
KwonI. (2014). Motivation, discretion, and corruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 765–794.
22.
McKinneyJ. A.MooreC. W. (2008). International bribery: Does a written code of ethics make a difference in perceptions of business professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1), 103–111.
23.
MeineM. F.DunnT. P. (2013). The search for ethical competency: Do ethical codes matter?Public Integrity, 15(2), 149–166.
24.
MenzelD. C. (2012). Ethics management for public administration: Leading and building organizations of integrity (2nd ed.). Routledge.
25.
MenzelD. C. (2015). Research on ethics and integrity in public administration: Moving forward, looking back. Public Integrity, 17(4), 343–370.
26.
Meyer-SahlingJ.-H. (2009). The Sustainability of Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe Five Years after Accession. SIGMA Paper Nr 44. Paris: OECD Publications.
27.
Meyer-SahlingJ.-H.LoweW.van StolkC. (2016) Silent professionalisation: EU exposure and the professional socialisation of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe. European Union Politics, 17(1), 162–183.
28.
MoilanenT.SalminenA. (2006). Comparative study on the public-service ethics of the EU member states. EUPAN Report for Human Resources Working Group.
29.
OECD. (2000). Trust in government: Ethics measures in OECD countries. OECD.
PalidauskaiteJ. (2006). Codes of ethics in transitional democracies: A comparative perspective. Public Integrity, 8(1), 35–48.
32.
PopeJ. (2000). Confronting corruption: The elements of national integrity systems. Transparency International.
33.
QuahJ. S. T. (2010). Defying institutional failure: Learning from the experiences of anti-corruption agencies in four Asian countries. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 53(1), 23–54.
34.
RohrJ. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker
35.
RubinE. V.WhitfordA. (2008). Effects of the institutional design of the civil service: Evidence from corruption. International Public Management Journal, 11(4), 404–425.
36.
SiemsenE.RothA.OliveiraP. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476.
37.
SIGMA. (2003). Poland: Public service and the administrative framework assessment 2003. OECD Publications.
38.
SixF.LawtonA. (2013). Towards a theory of integrity systems: A configurational approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 639–658.
39.
StevulakC.BrownP. M. (2011). Activating public sector ethics in transitional society. Public Integrity, 13(2), 97–111.
40.
StewartD. W.SprinthallN.SiemienskaR. (1997). Ethical reasoning in a time of revolution: A study of local officials in Poland. Public Administration Review, 57(5), 445–453.
41.
TreismanD. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 211–244.
42.
TrevinoL. K.WeaverG. R.GibsonD. G.TofflerB. L. (1999). Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41(2), 131–151.
43.
VachudovaM. A. (2009). Corruption and compliance in the EU's post-communist members and candidates. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(S1), 43–62.
44.
WeaverG. R.TreviñoL. K. (1999). Compliance and values oriented ethics programs: Influences on employees’ attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(2), 315–335.
45.
WrightB. E.HassanS.ParkJ. (2016). Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behaviour? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems. Public Administration, 94(3), 647–663.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
