Patterns of identification for special education services across three cohorts of students in kindergarten through third grade before and after implementation of a schoolwide, three-tier reading prevention model in one large school district are reported. The first cohort of students represents a historical control group that did not participate in the three-tier prevention model. The second and third cohorts of students represent successive cohorts of students who participated in the three-tier model from kindergarten to third grade. The data indicate a trend in the direction of a decreased percentage of students identified for special education through each cohort of students; however, there were no statistically significant differences in the overall percentages of students identified for special education across cohorts. Practical implications and further research are discussed.
Adams, M. ( 1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Bennett, K.J., Brown, K.S., Boyle, M., Racine, Y., & Offord, D. ( 2003). Does low reading achievement at school entry cause conduct problems? Social Science & Medicine, 56, 2443-2448.
3.
Burns, M.K., Appleton, J.J., & Stehouwer, J.D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381-394.
4.
Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers’ professional development. An account from the field. School Leadership and Management, 21, 43-57.
5.
Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., & Underwood, P.S. (2007). A second chance in second grade: The independent and cumulative impact of first- and second-grade reading instruction and students’ letter-word reading skill growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 199-233.
6.
Gersten, R., Morvant, M., & Brengelman, S. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52-66.
7.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
8.
Hinshaw, S.P. ( 1992). Academic underachievement, attention deficits, and aggression: Comorbidity and implications for intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 893-903.
Juel, C. ( 1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
11.
Lyon, G.R., & Chhabra, V. ( 1996). The current state of science and the future of specific reading disability. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 2-9.
12.
McCutchen, D., Abbott, R.D., Green, L.B., Beretvas, S.N., Cox, S., Potter, N.S., et al. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69-86.
13.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
14.
National Research Council. (2002). Report of the Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education: Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
15.
Newmann, F.M., King, M.B., & Youngs, P. ( 2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
16.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. ( 2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Education.
17.
Renyi, J. ( 1998). Building learning into the teaching job. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 70-74.
18.
Scarborough, H.S. ( 1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115-136.
19.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. ( 1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
Swanson, H.L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. ( 1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
21.
Texas Education Agency. (2008, May). Five years later: Special education. Retrieved February 8, 2007, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/prr10/5spEd.html
22.
Torgesen, J.K. (in press). The response to intervention instructional model: Some outcomes from a large-scale implementation in Reading First schools. Child Development Perspectives.
23.
Vadasy, P.F., Sanders, E.A., & Abbott, R.D. ( 2008). Effects of supplemental early reading intervention at 2-year follow up: Reading skill growth patterns and predictors. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 51-89.
24.
VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology , 45, 225-256.
25.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 137-146.
26.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Woodruff, T., Murray, C., Wanzek, J., Scammaca, N., et al. (2008). Effects of professional development on improving at-risk students’ performance in reading. In C. R. Greenwood, R. R. Kratochwill , & M. Clements (Eds.), Schoolwide prevention models: Lessons learned in elementary schools (pp. 115-142). New York: Guilford.
27.
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Fletcher, J.M. (2007). Multiple tiers of intervention: A framework for prevention and identification of students with reading/learning disabilities. In B. M. Taylor & J. E. Ysseldyke (Eds.), Effective instruction for struggling readers, K-6 (pp. 173-195). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
28.
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Linan-Thompson, S., & Murray, C. ( 2007). Monitoring response to intervention for students at-risk for reading difficulties: High and low responders. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 234-243). New York: Springer.
29.
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C., Scammaca, N., Linan-Thompson, S., & Woodruff, T.L. (2009). High and low responders to early reading intervention: Response to intervention. Exceptional Children, 75, 165-183.
30.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Jaccard, J. ( 2003). Toward distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as primary sources of difficulty in learning to read: A two year follow-up of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers. In B. F. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 73-120). Baltimore : York Press.
31.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
32.
Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. ( 2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126-142.
