AlfonsoV. C.FlanaganD. P. (2008). Assessment of preschool children: A framework for evaluating the adequacy of the technical characteristics of norm-referenced measurements. In MowderB.RubinsonF.YasikA. (Eds.), Evidence based practice in infant and early childhood psychology (pp. 129-166). New York, NY: John Wiley.
2.
AllenM. J.YenW. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
3.
BealA. L.DumontR.CruseC. L.BrancheA. H. (1996). Practical implications of differences between the American and Canadian norms for WISC-III and a short form for children with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 12, 7-14. doi:10.1177/082957359601200103
4.
BowdenS.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2011a). Augmenting the core battery with supplementary subtests: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–IV measurement invariance across the United States and Canada. Assessment, 18, 133-140. doi:10.1177/1073191110381717
5.
BowdenS.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (2011b). Invariance of the measurement model underlying the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–IV in the United States and Canada. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 186-199. doi:10.1177/0013164410387382
6.
CormierD. C.WangK.KennedyK. E. (2016). Linguistic demands of the oral directions for administering the WISC-IV and WISC-V. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 1-15. doi:10.1177/0829573516643314
7.
FlanaganD. P.KaufmanA. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
8.
GuilfordJ. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
HaertelE. H. (2006). Reliability. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 65-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
HarrisonA. G.HolmesA.SilvestriR.ArmstrongI. T. (2015). Implications for educational classification and psychological diagnoses when using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Fourth edition with Canadian as opposed to American norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 299-311. doi:10.1177/0734282915573723
11.
International Test Commission. (2005). International Guidelines on Test adaptation. Available from www.intestcom.org
12.
IversonG. L.LangeR. T.ViljoenH. (2006). Comparing the Canadian and American WAIS-III normative systems in inpatient neuropsychiatry and forensic psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 38, 348-353. doi:10.1037/cjbs2006020
13.
KranzlerJ. H.FloydR. G. (2013). Assessing intelligence in children and adolescents: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
MillerJ. L.WeissL. G.BealL.SaklofskeD. H.ZhuJ.HoldnackJ. A. (2015). Intelligent use of intelligence tests: Empirical and clinical support for Canadian WAIS-IV norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 312-328. doi:10.1177/0734282915578577
15.
NorfolkP. A.FarmerR. L.FloydR. G.WoodsI. L.HawkinsH. K.IrbyS. M. (2015). Norm block sample sizes: A review of 17 individually administered intelligence tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 544-554. doi:10.1177/0734282914562385
16.
NunnallyJ.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ. E.BoltS. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
19.
SattlerJ. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Sattler Publisher.
20.
SilverN. C.DunlapW. P. (1987). Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher’s z transformation be used?Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 146-148. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.146
StrubeM. J. (1988). Some comments of the use of magnitude-of-effect estimates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 342-345. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.35.3.342
23.
WechslerD. (1996). WISC-III manual Canadian supplement. Toronto, Ontario: Harcourt Brace & Company Canada.
24.
WechslerD. (2004). WISC-IVCDN Canadian Manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt Assessment.
WechslerD. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence (4th ed., Canadian). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Pearson.
27.
WechslerD. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (5th ed., WISC-VCDN). Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Canada Assessment.
28.
WeissL. G.SaklofskeD. H.HoldnackJ. A.PrifiteraA. (2015). WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29.
WilkinsC.RolfhusE.WeissL.ZhuJ. J. (2005, April). A new method for calibrating translated tests with small sample sizes. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
30.
ZhuJ.ChenH. (2011). Utility of inferential norming with smaller sample sizes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 570-580. doi:10.1177/0734282910396323