This paper discusses the neglected theme of job design in education. It argues that the traditional top-down method of designing work roles ignores the interests, abilities and needs of employees and leads to individuals adopting an unsanctioned approach to job design, ‘job crafting’. It is posited that a third approach is needed, that of ‘idiosyncratic deals' (or ‘i-deals'), which sees job design as a collaborative negotiation that has the potential to meet the needs of both organisation and employee. To ground this argument, the case of first-tier managers in further education (FE) is considered and a proposed framework of i-deals for this role is presented.
AnandS.VidyarthiP.LidenR.RousseauD. (2010) ‘Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality’. Academy of Management, 53(4), 970–88
2.
AvisJ.(1999) ‘Shifting identity: new conditions and the transformation of practice – teaching within post-compulsory education’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 51(2), 245–64.
3.
BergJ.WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. (2010) ‘Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: when proactivity requires adaptivity’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2), 158–86.
4.
BriggsA. (2005) ‘Middle managers in English further education colleges: understanding and modelling the role’. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 33(1), 27–50.
5.
DawleyD.AndrewsM.BucklewN. (2007) ‘Mentoring, supervisor support, and perceived organizational support’. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 235–47.
HornungS.RousseauD.GlaserJ.AngererP.WeiglM.
(2010) ‘Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals'. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 187–215.
12.
JamesonJ. (2010) ‘Trust and leadership in post-compulsory education: some snapshots of displaced dissent’. Power and Education, 2(1), 48–62.
13.
JamesonJ.McNayI. (2007) Ultimate FE Leadership and Management Handbook. London: Continuum.
14.
LumbyJ. (1997) ‘Developing managers in further education part 1: the extent of the task’. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 21(3), 345–54.
15.
McNayI. (1989) Learning to Manage. Lincs: Further Education Unit.
NgT.FeldmanD. (2009) ‘Idiosyncratic deals and organizational commitment’. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 76(3), 419–27.
18.
PageD. (2010) ‘Power and resistance in further education: findings from a study of first tier managers'. Power and Education, 2(2), 126–39.
19.
PageD. (2011a#x00029; ‘Fundamentalists, priests, martyrs and converts: a typology of first tier management in further education’. Research in Post-compulsory Education, 16(1), 101–21.
20.
PageD. (2011b) ‘From principled dissent to cognitive escape: managerial resistance in the English further education sector’. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 63(1), 1–13.
RousseauD. M.HoV. T.GreenbergJ. (2006) ‘I-deals: idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships'. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–94.
23.
RousseauD.HornungS.KimT. (2009) ‘Idiosyncratic deals: testing propositions on timing, content, and the employment relationship’. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 74(3), 338–48.
24.
ScaifeT. (2004) The Culture of the Now: Barriers To Research in FE. Paper presented at the Yorkshire and Humberside Learning and Skills Research Network, Leeds, July.
25.
SimkinsT.CloseP.SmithR. (2009) ‘Work-shadowing as a process for facilitating leadership succession in primary schools'. School Leadership and Management, 20(3), 239–51.
26.
TaylorI. (2007) ‘Discretion and control in education: the teacher as street-level bureaucrat’. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 35(4), 555–72.
27.
WaltonR. E. (2003) ‘From control to commitment in the workplace’. In
HandelM. J.
(ed.), The Sociology of Organizations: Class, Contemporary and Critical Readings. London: Sage, pp. 114–22.
28.
WeickK. E.
(1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
29.
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. (2001) ‘Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work’. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
