This study aimed to generate a more nuanced and socioculturally grounded analysis of the key drivers of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in India than those provided by current debates. Results, based on 19 elite, in-depth conversations with business leaders and senior managers actively involved in shaping CSR in India revealed that participant understandings of the drivers of CSR in India simultaneously negotiated apparently contradictory notions of moral and economic imperatives. Building on earlier calls for culturally locating the study of CSR, the article further proposes that the ancient Indian concept of dharma might be a probable theoretical framework within which these key drivers of CSR in India could be further understood.
ArevaloJ. A.AravindD. (2011). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: Approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance, 11, 399-414. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159244
BalasubramaniamN. K.KimberD.SiemensmaF. (2005). Emerging opportunities or traditions reinforced? An analysis of the attitude towards CSR and trends of thinking about CSR in India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 79-92.
4.
BansalP. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510-527. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.510.16765
5.
CapelliP.SinghH.SinghJ.UseemM. (2010). The India way: How India’s top business leaders are revolutionizing management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
6.
ChaudhriV.WangJ. (2007). Communicating CSR on the internet: A case study of the top 100 information technology companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 232-247. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318907308746
7.
ChildJ.TsaiT. (2005). The dynamic between firms’ environmental strategies and institutional constraints in emerging economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 95-125. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00490.x
8.
CloudD. L. (2007). Corporate social responsibility as oxymoron: Universalization and exploitation at Boeing. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 219-231). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
DasG. (2009). The difficulty of being good: On the subtle art of dharma. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books.
10.
GautamR.SinghA. (2010). CSR practices in India: A study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research, 1, 41-56.
HeugensP. M. A. R.KapteinM.Van OosterhoutJ. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 100-121.
13.
JuholinE. (2004). For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 4, 20-31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700410547477
14.
KimJ.KimH. J.CameronG. T. (2009). Making nice may not matter: The interplay of crisis type, response type and crisis issue on perceived organizational responsibility. Public Relations Review, 35, 86-88. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.013
15.
KumarR.MurphyD. F.BalsariV. (2001). Altered images, the 2001 state of corporate responsibility in India poll: Understanding and encouraging corporate responsibility in South Asia. Retrieved from http://www.terieurope.org/docs/CSR-India.pdf
L’EtangJ. (1994). Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 111-123. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00881580
18.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
MayS. (2011). Organizational communication and corporate social responsibility. In IhlenO.BartlettJ. L.MayS. (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 87-109). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118083246.ch5
20.
MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.). (2007). The debate over corporate social responsibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
McCrackenG. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37, 1480-1495. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385696
23.
MehraM. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in emerging economies. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 20-22.
24.
MitraM. (2007). It’s only business! India’s corporate social responsiveness in a globalized world. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
25.
MohanA. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2, 107-117.
26.
MullerA.KolkA. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1-26. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00855.x
27.
PioE. (2005). Eastern karma: Perspectives on corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 19, 65-78.
SagarP.SinglaA. (2004). Trust and corporate social responsibility: Lessons from India. Journal of Communication Management, 8, 282-290. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13632540410807691
30.
SharmaA. K.TalwarB. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Modern vis-à-vis Vedic approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 9, 35-45. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683040510588828
31.
SharmaS. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in India. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 637-649.
SrirameshK.NgC. W.SohT. T.LouW. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and public relations: Perceptions and practices in Singapore. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 119-134). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
SundarP. (2000). Beyond business: From merchant charity to corporate citizenship: Indian business philanthropy through the ages. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill.
35.
WhelanG. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A Confucian context. In MayS.CheneyG.RoperJ. (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 105-118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
WokutchR. E.ShepardJ. M. (1999). The maturing of the Japanese economy: Corporate social responsibility implications. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9, 527-540. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857515
