Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The sunk-cost fallacy—pursuing an inferior alternative merely because we have previously invested significant, but nonrecoverable, resources in it—represents a striking violation of rational decision making. Whereas theoretical accounts and empirical examinations of the sunk-cost effect have generally been based on the assumption that it is a purely intrapersonal phenomenon (i.e., solely driven by one’s own past investments), the present research demonstrates that it is also an interpersonal effect (i.e., people will alter their choices in response to other people’s past investments). Across eight experiments (N = 6,076) covering diverse scenarios, I documented sunk-cost effects when the costs are borne by someone other than the decision maker. Moreover, the interpersonal sunk-cost effect is not moderated by social closeness or whether other people observe their sunk costs being “honored.” These findings uncover a previously undocumented bias, reveal that the sunk-cost effect is a much broader phenomenon than previously thought, and pose interesting challenges for existing accounts of this fascinating human tendency.

Keywords

decision making heuristics preferences social influence open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arkes

H. R.

(1996). The psychology of waste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 213–224.

Arkes

H. R.

Ayton

(1999). The sunk-cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals? Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600.

Arkes

H. R.

Blumer

(1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140.

Bornstein

B. H.

Chapman

G. B.

(1995). Learning lessons from sunk costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 251–269.

Bornstein

B. H.

Emler

A. C.

Chapman

G. B.

(1999). Rationality in medical treatment decisions: Is there a sunk-cost effect? Social Science & Medicine, 49, 215–222.

Brockner

(1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39–61.

Busemeyer

J. R.

Pleskac

T. J.

(2009). Theoretical tools for understanding and aiding dynamic decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53, 126–138.

Dawes

Hastie

(2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Frisch

(1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399–429.

10.

Garland

Newport

(1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55–69.

11.

Goldstein

N. J.

Cialdini

R. B.

(2007). The spyglass self: A model of vicarious self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 402–417.

12.

Gunia

B. C.

Sivanathan

Galinsky

A. D.

(2009). Vicarious entrapment: Your sunk costs, my escalation of commitment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1238–1244.

13.

Haws

K. L.

Naylor

R. W.

Coulter

R. A.

Bearden

W. O.

(2012). Keeping it all without being buried alive: Understanding product retention tendency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 224–236.

14.

JASP Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/download/

15.

Jones

Rachlin

(2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.

16.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

17.

Norton

M. I.

Monin

Cooper

Hogg

M. A.

(2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47–62.

18.

Pompilio

Kacelnik

Behmer

S. T.

(2006). State-dependent learned valuation drives choice in an invertebrate. Science, 311, 1613–1615.

19.

Pronin

Olivola

C. Y.

Kennedy

K. A.

(2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224–236.

20.

Samuelson

(1958). Economics: An introductory analysis (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

21.

Staw

(1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.

22.

Staw

(1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577–587.

23.

Strough

Mehta

C. M.

McFall

J. P.

Schuller

K. L.

(2008). Are older adults less subject to the sunk-cost fallacy than younger adults? Psychological Science, 19, 650–652.

24.

Thaler

(1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60.

25.

Thaler

R. H.

(1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206.

26.

Urminsky

(2017). The role of psychological connectedness to the future self in decisions over time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 34–39.

27.

Wong

K. F. E.

Kwong

J. Y.

(2007). The role of anticipated regret in escalation of commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 545–554.

28.

Zeelenberg

Van Dijk

(1997). A reverse sunk cost effect in risky decision making: Sometimes we have too much invested to gamble. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 677–691.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.22 MB

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

0.21 MB