Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Governments have proposed text warning labels to decrease consumption of sugary drinks—a contributor to chronic diseases such as diabetes. However, they may be less effective than more evocative, graphic warning labels. We field-tested the effectiveness of graphic warning labels (vs. text warning labels, calorie labels, and no labels), provided insight into psychological mechanisms driving effectiveness, and assessed consumer sentiment. Study 1 indicated that graphic warning labels reduced the share of sugary drinks purchased in a cafeteria from 21.4% at baseline to 18.2%—an effect driven by substitution of water for sugary drinks. Study 2 showed that graphic warning labels heighten negative affect and prompt consideration of health consequences. Study 3 indicated that public support for graphic warning labels can be increased by conveying effectiveness information. These findings could spur more effective labeling policies that facilitate healthier choices, do not decrease overall beverage purchases, and are publicly accepted.

Keywords

decision making food health policy making preferences open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bleich

S. N.

Barry

C. L.

Gary-Webb

T. L.

Herring

B. J.

(2014). Reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption by providing caloric information: How Black adolescents alter their purchases and whether the effects persist. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 2417–2424. doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302150

Bleich

S. N.

Economos

C. D.

Spiker

M. L.

Vercammen

K. A.

VanEpps

E. M.

Block

J. P.

. . . Roberto

C. A.

(2017). A systematic review of calorie labeling and modified calorie labeling interventions: Impact on consumer and restaurant behavior. Obesity, 25, 2018–2044. doi:10.1002/oby.21940

Bleich

S. N.

Herring

B. J.

Flagg

D. D.

Gary-Webb

T. L.

(2012). Reduction in purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages among low-income Black adolescents after exposure to caloric information. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 329–335. doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300350

Block

J. P.

Roberto

C. A.

(2014). Potential benefits of calorie labeling in restaurants. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 887–888. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9239

Bollard

Maubach

Walker

Ni Mhurchu

(2016). Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: An experimental study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, Article 95. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7

Borland

Wilson

Fong

G. T.

Hammond

Cummings

K. M.

Yong

H.-H.

. . . McNeill

(2009). Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: Findings from four countries over five years. Tobacco Control, 18, 358–364. doi:10.1136/tc.2008.028043

Burstein

(2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29–40. doi:10.1177/106591290305600103

Coady

M. H.

Chan

C. A.

Auer

Farley

S. M.

Kilgore

E. A.

Kansagra

S. M.

(2012). Awareness and impact of New York City’s graphic point-of-sale tobacco health warning signs. Tobacco Control, 22, e51–e56. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050261

Colchero

M. A.

Rivera-Dommarco

Popkin

B. M.

S. W.

(2017). In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Affairs, 36, 564–571. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231

10.

Downs

J. S.

Loewenstein

Wisdom

(2009). Strategies for promoting healthier food choices. American Economic Review, 99, 159–164. doi:10.1257/aer.99.2.159

11.

Downs

J. S.

Wisdom

Wansink

Loewenstein

(2013). Supplementing menu labeling with calorie recommendations to test for facilitation effects. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1604–1609. doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301218

12.

Emery

L. F.

Romer

Sheerin

K. M.

Jamieson

K. H.

Peters

(2014). Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16, 263–269. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt124

13.

Evans

A. T.

Peters

Strasser

A. A.

Emery

L. F.

Sheerin

K. M.

Romer

(2015). Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful responses from smokers: Results of a randomized clinical trial. PLOS ONE, 10(12), Article e0142879. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142879

14.

Fagerlin

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Ubel

P. A.

(2011). Helping patients decide: Ten steps to better risk communication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103, 1436–1443. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr318

15.

Fung

T. T.

Malik

Rexrode

K. M.

Manson

J. E.

Willett

W. C.

F. B.

(2009). Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89, 1037–1042. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2008.27140

16.

Hayes

A. F.

Preacher

K. J.

(2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028

17.

Hollands

G. J.

Shemilt

Marteau

T. M.

Jebb

S. A.

Lewis

H. B.

Wei

. . . Ogilvie

(2015). Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2

18.

John

L. K.

Donnelly

G. E.

Roberto

C. A.

(2017). Psychologically informed implementations of sugary-drink portion limits. Psychological Science, 28, 620–629. doi:10.1177/0956797617692041

19.

Kim

A. E.

Nonnemaker

J. M.

Loomis

B. R.

Shafer

P. R.

Shaikh

Hill

. . . Farrelly

M. C.

(2014). Influence of point-of-sale tobacco displays and graphic health warning signs on adults: Evidence from a virtual store experimental study. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 888–895.

20.

Korfage

I. J.

Fuhrel-Forbis

Ubel

P. A.

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Greene

S. M.

McClure

J. B.

. . . Fagerlin

(2013). Informed choice about breast cancer prevention: Randomized controlled trial of an online decision aid intervention. Breast Cancer Research, 15, Article R74. doi:10.1186/bcr3468

21.

Loewenstein

(1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028

22.

Loewenstein

Read

Baumeister

R. F.

(2003). Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives of intertemporal choice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

23.

Loewenstein

G. F.

Weber

E. U.

Hsee

C. K.

Welch

(2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

24.

Ludwig

D. S.

Peterson

K. E.

Gortmaker

S. L.

(2001). Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: A prospective, observational analysis. The Lancet, 357, 505–508. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04041-1

25.

Noar

S. M.

Francis

D. B.

Bridges

Sontag

J. M.

Brewer

N. T.

Ribisl

K. M.

(2017). Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: A systematic review. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 416–442. doi:10.1177/1077699016674188

26.

Noar

S. M.

Francis

D. B.

Bridges

Sontag

J. M.

Ribisl

K. M.

Brewer

N. T.

(2016). The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.011

27.

Noar

S. M.

Hall

M. G.

Francis

D. B.

Ribisl

K. M.

Pepper

J. K.

Brewer

N. T.

(2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control, 25, 341–354. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978

28.

Peters

(2006). The functions of affect in the construction of preferences. In Lichtenstein

Slovic

(Eds.), The construction of preference (pp. 454–463). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Peters

Lipkus

Diefenbach

M. A.

(2006). The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, S140–S162. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00287.x

30.

Peters

Romer

Slovic

Jamieson

K. H.

Wharfield

Mertz

C. K.

Carpenter

S. M.

(2007). The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9, 473–481. doi:10.1080/14622200701239639

31.

Purmehdi

Legoux

Carrillat

Senecal

(2017). The effectiveness of warning labels for consumers: A meta-analytic investigation into their underlying process and contingencies. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36, 36–53. doi:10.1509/jppm.14.047

32.

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration, 696 F.3d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 2012).

33.

Roberto

C. A.

Wong

Musicus

Hammond

(2016). The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices. Pediatrics, 137, Article e20153185. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3185

34.

Rolls

B. J.

Morris

E. L.

Roe

L. S.

(2002). Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76, 1207–1213.

35.

Schulze

M. B.

Manson

J. E.

Ludwig

D. S.

Graham

A. C.

Meir

J. S.

Walter

C. W.

Frank

B. H.

(2004). Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 927–934. doi:10.1001/jama.292.8.927

36.

Silver

L. D.

S. W.

Ryan-Ibarra

Taillie

L. S.

Induni

Miles

D. R.

. . . Popkin

B. M.

(2017). Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLOS Medicine, 14, Article e1002283. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283

37.

Simmons

(2014, April 4). MTurk vs. the lab: Either way we need big samples. Retrieved from http://datacolada.org/18

38.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632

39.

Slovic

Finucane

M. L.

Peters

MacGregor

D. G.

(2002). The affect heuristic. In Gilovich

Griffin

Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–421). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

40.

Stroebe

van Koningsbruggen

G. M.

Papies

E. K.

Aarts

(2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120, 110–138. doi:10.1037/a0030849

41.

Sunstein

C. R.

(2016). People prefer System 2 nudges (kind of). Duke Law Journal, 66(121), 122–168.

42.

U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2014). Food labeling: Nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food establishments. Final regulatory impact analysis. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/LabelingNutrition/UCM423985.pdf

43.

U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2016). A labeling guide for restaurants and retail establishments selling away-from-home foods—Part II (menu labeling requirements in accordance with 21 CFR 101.11): Guidance for industry. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/UCM461963.pdf

44.

VanEpps

E. M.

Roberto

C. A.

(2016). The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage warnings: A randomized trial of adolescents’ choices and beliefs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51, 664–672. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.010

45.

Wiener

Mar

Cohen

Avalos

(2015). Sugar-sweetened beverage warning for advertisements. Retrieved from http://www.sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/ordinances15/o0100-15.pdf

46.

Wilson

T. D.

Gilbert

D. T.

(2008). Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 370–386. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00085.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.79 MB

0.83 MB