This paper suggests a framework in which the importance of the individual dimension and agency can be reclaimed within a profoundly social and relational view of the self. Juxtaposed with recent research on the self, cultural-historical activity theory is discussed, including its foundational premises formulated by Vygotsky and its conception of the self articulated by Leontiev. Expanded in a number of ways proposed in this paper, this theory helps to theorize the self (a) in its practical relevance, as a lawful and necessary moment in human collective practices, (b) as endowed with the capacity to generate new cycles of practice, and (c) as immanent in activities that position individuals to contribute to meaningfully changing the world. The concept of ‘self as a leading activity’ is discussed as a way to capture what the self is, where it is located, and what its purpose and relation to society are.
Altman, I. , & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokolis & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1-40). New York: Wiley .
2.
Ansoff, R. (1996). How can there be personal agency without an ontology of the individual?Theory & Psychology, 6, 539-544 .
3.
Arievitch, I.M. (2003). A potential for an integrated view of development and learning: Galperin’s contribution to sociocultural psychology . Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10, 278-288 .
4.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (R.W. Rotsel, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis. (Original work published 1929.)
5.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogical imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin ( M.E. Holmquist , Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holmquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press .
6.
Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
7.
Baumeister, R.F. (1997). The self and society. In R.D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 191-217). New York: Oxford University Press .
8.
Burkitt, I. (1991). Social selves: Theories of the social formation of personality. London: Sage .
9.
Case, R. (1991). Stages in the development of the young child’s first sense of self . Developmental Review, 11, 21-230 .
10.
Chaiklin, S. (Ed.). (2001). The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press .
11.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
12.
Cole, M. , Engeström, Y. , & Vasques, O. (Eds.). (1997). Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Cole, M. , & Wertsch, J. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky . Human Development, 39, 250-256 .
Dunn, R.G. (1997). Self, identity, and difference: Mead and poststructuralists . Sociological Quarterly, 38, 687-706 .
16.
Elkonin, D.B. (1978). Psihologija igri [The psychology of play]. Moscow: Pedagogika .
17.
Elkonin, D.B. (1989). K probleme periodizatsii psihicheskogo razvitija v detskom vozraste [On periodization of psychological development in childhood]. In V. Davydov & V. Zinchenko (Eds.), D.B. Elkonin, Izbrannie psihologicheskie trudi [Selected psychological works] (pp. 60-78). Moscow: Pedagogika . (Original work published 1974.)
18.
Engels, F. (1961). The dialectics of nature. In K. Marx & F. Engels , Collected works (2nd ed., Vol. 20, pp. 339-625). Moscow: IML Press . (Original work published 1873-83.)
19.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy .
20.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Communication, discourse and activity . The Communication Review, 30 (1-2), 165-185 .
21.
Engeström, Y. , Miettinen, R. , & Punamaeki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press .
22.
Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press .
23.
Glassman, M. (1996). Understanding Vygotsky’s motive and goal: An exploration of the work of A.N. Leontiev . Human Development, 39, 309-327 .
24.
Harter, S. (1997). The personal self in social context: Barriers to authenticity. In R.D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 81-105). New York: Oxford University Press .
25.
Hermans, H.J.M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind: Introduction . Theory & Psychology, 12, 147-160 .
26.
Hicks, D. (2000). Self and other in Bakhtin’s early philosophical essays: Prelude to a theory of prose consciousness . Mind, Culture and Activity, 7, 227-242 .
27.
Holland, D. (1997). Selves as cultured: As told by an anthropologist who lacks a soul. In R.D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 160-190). New York.: Oxford University Press .
28.
Holland, D. , Lachicotte, W. , Skinner, D. , & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
29.
Homskaya, E. D. (2001). Alexander Romanovich Luria: A scientific biography. ( D.E. Tupper , Ed.). New York: Plenum .
30.
Ilyenkov, E.V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory (H.C. Creighton, Trans.). Moscow: Progress .
31.
Jenkins, A.H. (2001). Individuality in cultural context: The case for psychological agency . Theory & Psychology, 11, 347-362 .
32.
Jones, P.E. (1999). The ‘embodied mind’: Contrasting visions . Mind, Culture and Activity, 6, 274-285 .
33.
Jussim, L. , & Ashmore, R.D. (1997). Fundamental issues in the study of self and identity: Contrasts, contexts, and conflicts. In R.D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 218-230). New York: Oxford University Press .
34.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press .
35.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press .
36.
Leontiev, A.A. (1983). Tvorcheskij put A.N. Leontieva [The scholarly career of A.N. Leontiev]. In A. Zaporozhets , V. Zinchenko , O. Ovchinnikova , & O. Tikhomirov (Eds.), A.N. Leontiev i sovremennaja psihologia [A.N. Leontiev and modern psychology] (pp. 6-39). Moscow: Moscow University Publishers .
Leontiev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind (M. Kopylova, Trans.). Moscow: Progress . (Original work published 1959.)
39.
Leontiev, A.N. (1983a). Activity, consciousness, personality. In V. Davydov , V. Zinchenko , A.A. Leontiev , & A. Petrovskij (Eds.), A.N. Leontiev. Izbrannie psihologicheskie proizvedenija [A.N. Leontiev. Selected psychological works] (Vol. 2, pp. 94-231). Moscow: Pedagogika . (Original work published 1975.)
40.
Leontiev, A.N. (1983b). The deed as the beginning of personality. In V. Davydov , V. Zinchenko , A.A. Leontiev , & A. Petrovskij (Eds.), A.N. Leontiev. Izbrannie psihologicheskie proizvedenija [A.N. Leontiev. Selected psychological works] (Vol. 1, pp. 381-385). Moscow: Pedagogika . (Original work published 1976.)
41.
Linehan, C. , & McCarthy, J. (2000). Positioning in practice: Understanding participation in the social world . Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 435-453 .
42.
Luria, A.R. (1982). Etapi projdennogo puti: Nauchnaja avtobiografija [The stages of the path: A scholarly autobiography]. Moscow: Moscow University Press .
43.
Markus, H. , & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation . Psychological Review, 98, 224-253 .
44.
Martin, J. , & Sugarman, J. (2000). Between the modern and the postmodern: The possibility of self and progressive understanding in psychology . American Psychologist, 55, 397-406 .
45.
Marx, K. (1955). Theses on Feuerbach. In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1-4). Moscow: IML Press . (Original work published 1888.)
46.
Miettinen, R. (1999). Transcending traditional school learning: Teachers’ work and networks of learning. In Y. Engeström , R. Miettinen , & R.-L. Punamaeki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 325-346). New York: Cambridge University Press .
47.
Packer, M.J. , & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology . Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241 .
48.
Penuel, W.R. , & Wertsch, J.V. (1995). Vygotsky and identity formation: A sociocultural approach . Educational Psychologist, 30, 83-92 .
49.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press .
50.
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners . Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 209-229 .
51.
Stetsenko, A. (1995). The role of the principle of object-relatedness in the activity theory: Critiquing activity theory from ‘outside’ and from ‘inside’ . Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 33 (6), 54-69 .
52.
Stetsenko, A. (2002). Knowledge as activity. In D. Robbins & A. Stetsenko (Eds.), Voices within Vygotsky’s non-classical psychology: Past, present, future (pp. 174-179). Hauppauge, NY: Nova .
53.
Stetsenko, A. (2003). Alexander Luria and the cultural-historical activity theory: Pieces for the history of an outstanding collaborative project in psychology . Mind, Culture and Activity, 10, 93-97 .
54.
Stetsenko, A. (2004). Introduction to Vygotsky’s ‘The tool and sign in child development’. In R. Rieber & D. Robbinson (Eds.), Essential Vygotsky (pp. 499-510). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum .
55.
Stetsenko, A. (in press). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective types of activity . Mind, Culture, and Activity.
56.
Stetsenko, A. , & Arievitch, I. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism . Mind, Culture and Activity, 4, 160-173 .
57.
Stryker, S. , & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interactionism and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 311-378). New York: Random House .
58.
Thelen, E. , & Smith, L.B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. 5th edition. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 563-634). New York: Wiley .
59.
Tolstaya, T. (1998, April 13). Mikhail Gorbachev. TIME 100: Leaders & Revolutionaries. Retrieved January 26, 2004, from http://www.time.com/time/time100/leaders/profile/gorbachev.html
60.
Valsiner, J. (2002). Forms of dialogical relations and semiotic autoregulation within the self . Theory & Psychology, 12, 251-265 .
61.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society ( M. Cole , V. John-Steiner , S. Scribner , & E. Souberman , Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
62.
Wertsch, J.V. (Ed.). (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe .
63.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
64.
Yaroshevskij, M.G. (1989). Lev Vygotsky. Moscow: Progress .
65.
Zinchenko, V.P. (1995). Cultural-historical psychology and the psychological theory of activity: Retrospect and prospect. In J.V. Wertsch , P. del Río, & A. Alvarez . (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
66.
Zinchenko, V.P. (2001). External and internal: Another comment on the issue. In S. Chaiklin (Ed.), The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 135-147). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press .
