Utilizing social rhetorical criticism and social cultural texture, this exegetical analysis of John 4 examines the transformational interaction of Jesus and a Samaritan woman. Previous research focuses on the woman’s demographic profile without fully investigating the significance of relational demography in the context of first century Mediterranean culture. This analysis of the social cultural texture of John 4 presents a model for Christian leadership that crosses gender, race, and geographic barriers and capitalizes on the benefits of relational demography for organizational success.
ByrneD (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
8.
ChunKMBallsOPMartinG (2003) Acculturation: Advances in Theory, Measurement, and Applied Research. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
DavidsonJA (2006) The well women of scripture revisited. Journal of the Adventist Theological Society17(1): 209–28.
10.
DipboyeRLColellaA (2005) Discrimination at Work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
DockeryDS (1988) Reading John 4.1–45: Some diverse hermeneutical perspectives. Criswell Theological Review3(1): 127–40.
12.
DouglasCFerrisGRBuckleyMRGundlachMJ (2003) A volume in LMX leadership: the series. In: GraenG (ed.) Dealing with Diversity. Greenwich, CT: Information Age, 59–90.
13.
DuboisECSmithRC (2007) Elizabeth Cady Stanton Feminist as Thinker. New York: New York University Press.
14.
DuffyMKFerrierWJ (2003) Bird’s of a feather? How supervisor-subordinate dissimilarity moderated the influence of supervisor behaviors on workplace attitudes. Group and Organizational Management28: 217–48.
FarmerCS (1996) Changing images of the Samaritan woman in early reformed commentaries on John. American Society of Church History65(3): 365–75.
17.
GerstnerCRDayDV (1997) Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlations and constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology82(6): 837–44.
18.
GoertzenBJFritzS (2004) Does sex of dyad members really matter?Journal of Leadership Education3(1): 1–18.
19.
GreenSGAndersonSEShiversSL (1996) Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes66(2): 203–14.
HambrickDCChoTSChenMJ (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly41(4): 659–84.
22.
HarrisonDAPriceKHBellMP (1998) Beyond relational demography: time, and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal41(1): 96–107.
23.
KeenerCS (1993) The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downers Grove, AL: InterVarsity Press.
24.
KernK (2007) Free Woman is a Divine Being the Savior of Mankind: Elizabeth Cady Stanton Feminist as Thinker. New York: New York University Press, 93–110.
25.
KostenbergerAJ (2002) John. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
TownsE (2002) The Gospel of John. Chattanooga, TN: AMG International.
38.
TsuiASO’ReillyCO (1989) Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal32(2): 402–23.
39.
WilliamsKYO’ReillyCA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior20: 77–140.
