To facilitate music composition among children and students, this study examined the properties of automated music composition, attempting to leverage this advanced technique to provide children with an easy-to-learn and easy-to-accomplish method of composing music. Consequently, a graphical interface-based automated music composition (GBAMC) software program was developed, yielding enhanced usability, sequenced design, graphical technology, auditory learning, and intelligence. Learning satisfaction and attitude were surveyed among sixth-grade elementary school students (age = 12 years), indicating that students typically exhibited high levels of learning satisfaction and a positive learning attitude; learning satisfaction and attitude were also positively and significantly correlated in each dimension. Finally, recommendations were proposed for future studies to help users enjoy music composition without requiring an extensive background in musical theory.
AddessiA.R.PachetF. (2005). Experiments with a musical machine: musical style replication in 3/5 year old children. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 21–46.
2.
AddessiA.R.PachetF. (2006). Young children confronting the Continuator, an interactive reflective musical system. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue 2005–2006, 13–39.
3.
AmesC. (1987). Automated composition in retrospect: 1956–1986. Leonardo, 20(2), 169–185.
4.
AzzaraC. D. (2002). Improvisation. In ColwellR.RichardsonC.P. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 171–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BarrettM. S. (1998). Researching children’s compositional processes and products: What have we learnt? In SundinB.McPhersonG. E.FolkestadG. (Eds.), Children composing: Research in music education (pp. 10–34). Skåne län, Sweden: Lund University.
6.
BottJ. N.CrowleyJ. G.LaViolaJ. J.Jr. (2009). Exploring 3D gestural interfaces for music creation in video games. In Proceedings of the 4th international Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 18–25). Association for Computer Machinery.
7.
BurnardP. (2000). How children ascribe meaning to improvisation and composition: rethinking pedagogy in music education. Music Education Research, 2(1), 7–23.
8.
ChenH. (2012). The integration of information technology in music teacher education and school music education in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
9.
DidkovskyN.CrawfordL. (2006). Java Music Specification Language and Max/MSP. Proceedings of the 2006 International Computer Music Conference (pp. 620–623), November 6–11, 2006. New Orleans, USA.
10.
EdwardsM. (2011). Algorithmic composition: Computational thinking in music. Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), 54(7), 58–67.
11.
ElsdonA. (2007). Mobile music creation using pdas and smartphones. In Proceedings of the Mobile Music Workshop (MMW-07), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
12.
FolmerE.GurpJ.BoschJ. (2003). A framework for capturing the relationship between usability and software architecture. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 8(2), 67–87.
13.
GöktürkD. (2008). Suzuki violin teaching method: Its theory, philosophy, and criticism. Turkish Journal of Music Education, 1(1), 4–11.
14.
GolverJ. (2000). Children Composing 4–14. London: Routledge.
15.
GordonE. (2003). A music learning theory for newborn and young children. Chicago, Il.: GIA Publications.
16.
GreenL. (2006). Popular music education in and for itself, and for ‘other’music: Current research in the classroom. International Journal of Music Education, 24(2), 101–118.
17.
HillerL.IsaacsonL. (1959). Experimental music. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
HoW. C. (2004). Use of information technology and music learning in the search for quality education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 57–67.
19.
HoulahanM.TackaP. (2008). Kodály today: A cognitive approach to elementary music education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
HsiehY. M. (2005). The creative thinking of music. Guidance of Elementary Education, 44(6), 42–46.
21.
HuangC. F. (2008). Entering the world of digital music composition. Journal of Aesthetic Education Taiwan, 163, 19–29.
22.
JenningsK. (2006). Computer graphical interfaces, reflection and music composition–A holistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
23.
KaschubM. (1997). A comparison of two composer-guided large group composition projects. Research Studies in Music Education, 8(1), 15–27.
24.
KaschubM.SmithJ. (2009). Minds on music: composition for creative and critical thinking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
KirkpatrickD. L. (1979). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Classic writings on Instructional Technology, 1, 231–241.
26.
MotaG.GonçalvesD.OliveiraA. D.SousaA.CalheirosF.RibeiroH. (2008). Composing with Hyperscore in general music classes: An exploratory study. In Ministry of Education (Ed.), The nine-year syllabus for junior high school and preliminary school. Taipei, Taiwan.
27.
MurrayS. (1976). Creative music education: A handbook for the modern music teacher. New York: Schirmer Books.
28.
NierhausG. (2009). Algorithmic composition: Paradigms of automated music generation. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
29.
NijsL.MoensB.LesaffreM.LemanM. (2012). The music paint machine: Stimulating self-monitoring through the generation of creative visual output using a technology-enhanced learning tool. Journal of New Music Research, 41(1), 79–101.
30.
ParkerL. (2002). An education “in” and “through” Music. In ShiehM., (Ed.), 7th Dalcroze Eurhythmics International Workshop. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute Jaques-Dalcroze (JID).
31.
ReimerB. (2003). A philosophy of music education: Advancing the vision. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
32.
RosenboomD. (1996). Improvisation and composition–synthesis and integration into the music curriculum. Proceedings, The 71st Annual Meeting, 1995 (pp. 19–31). Reston, VA: National Association of Schools of Music.
33.
RudiJ. (2007). Computer music composition for children. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 24(2), 140–143.
34.
SeitzJ. A. (2005). Dalcroze, the body, movement and musicality. Psychology of Music, 33(4), 419–435.
35.
VolzM. (2005). Improvisation begins with exploration. Music Educators Journal, 92(1), 50–53.
36.
WebsterP. R. (2007). Computer-based technology and music teaching and learning: 2000–2005. In BreslerL. (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 1311–1330). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
37.
WigginsJ. (2007). Authentic practice and process in music teacher education. Music Educators Journal, 93(3), 36–42.
38.
WuL. M. (2009). A study in participating extracurricular music learning of motivations and attitudes and effects for middle and higher grade students of elementary schools in Tao-Yuan county. Unpublished Master Thesis, Department of Music, National Hsinchu University of Education, Taiwan.
