The current study examines cross-cultural differences in norms for meetings. Following Eisenhardt, we used a broad set of conceptual dimensions for analyzing meetings as a genre of organizational communication (Yates & Orlikowski) to guide a within- and cross-case analysis of meetings in two cultures. Our goal was to discover the possible existence of patterns and interpretations within cultures, and contrasts and explanations across cultures. Data from three different data sets were analyzed encompassing a total of 10 teams each with German and U.S. American subgroups. Findings show that Germans and U.S. Americans have different expectations and practices concerning the purpose, content, structure, and timing of meetings, and the roles of participants. The underlying meaning of these differences is explored. Theoretical and practical contributions of the work are discussed.
AdairW. L.BrettJ. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16, 33-51. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.010210.1287/orsc.1040.0102
2.
AngouriJ. (2010). “If we know about culture it will be easier to work with one another”: Developing skills for handling corporate meetings with multinational participation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 10, 206-224. doi:10.1080/1470847090334854910.1080/14708470903348549
3.
BrannenM. Y.SalkJ. E. (2000). Partnering across borders: Negotiating organizational culture in a German-Japanese joint venture. Human Relations, 53, 451-487. doi:10.1177/001872670053400110.1177/0018726700534001
4.
DiStefanoJ. J.MaznevskiM. L. (2000). Creating value with diverse teams in global management. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 45-63. doi:10.1016/s0090-2616(00)00012-710.1016/s0090-2616(00)00012-7
5.
DuttaS. (2001). Daimler-Chrysler merger—A cultural mismatch (The European Case Clearing House, No. 301-231-1). Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University, European Case Clearing House UK.
6.
EisenhardtK. E. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. doi:10.2307/25855710.2307/258557
7.
FearonJ. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195-222. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215943
8.
FridayR. A. (1989). Contrasts in discussion behaviors of German and American managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 429-446. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(89)90022-910.1016/0147-1767(89)90022-9
9.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, UK: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
11.
Harvard Business Essentials. (2003). Business communication. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
12.
HedderichN. (1999). When cultures clash: Views from the professions. Die Unterrichtspraxis/ Teaching German, 32, 158-165. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3531756
13.
HofstedeG. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London, UK: McGraw-Hill.
14.
ImH.-G.YatesJ.OrlikowskiW. (2005). Temporal coordination through communication: Using genres in a virtual start-up organization. Information Technology & People, 18, 89-119. doi:10.1108/0959384051060149610.1108/09593840510601496
15.
KöhlerT. (2009). What role do norms play in global teamwork? The influence of cultural communication and coordination norms on team processes in internationally distributed teams (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University). Retrieved from http://u2.gmu.edu:8080/dspace/bitstream/1920/4557/1/Koehler_Tine.pdf
16.
KöhlerT.BerryM. (2008). Creating synergy for inter-cultural learning. In SalmonsJ.WilsonL. (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic collaboration and organizational synergy (pp. 142-158). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
17.
MeyerH.-D. (1993). The cultural gap in long-term international work groups: A German-American case study. European Management Journal, 11, 93-101. doi:10.1016/0263-2373(93)90029-h10.1016/0263-2373(93)90029-h
18.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, UK: SAGE.
19.
MillhousL. M. (1999). The experience of culture in multicultural groups: Case studies of Russian-American collaboration in business. Small Group Research, 30, 280-307. doi:10.1177/10464964990300030210.1177/104649649903000302
20.
MyersF. R. (1986). Reflections on a meeting: Structure, language, and the polity in a small-scale society. American Ethnologist, 13, 430-447. doi:10.1525/ae.1986.13.3.02a0002010.1525/ae.1986.13.3.02a00020
21.
OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 541-574. doi:10.2307/239377110.2307/2393771
22.
SchmidtP. L. (1999). Understanding American and German business cultures: A manager’s guide to the cultural context in which American and German companies operate. Duesseldorf, Germany: Meridian World Press.
23.
SchwartzmanH. B. (1986). The meeting as a neglected social form in organizational studies. In StawBarry M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 233-258. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24.
SonnentagS. (2001). High performance and meeting participation: An observational study in software design teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practiced, 5, 3-18. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.5.1.310.1037/1089-2699.5.1.3
25.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In NormanD.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
SzaboE. (2007). Participative management and culture: A qualitative and integrated study in five European countries. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
27.
ThompsonK. (2006). English for meetings. Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen Verlag.
28.
TrompenaarF. (1994). Riding the waves of culture. New York, NY: Irwin.
29.
VolkemaR. J.NiedermanF. (1995). Organizational meetings: Formats and information requirements. Small Group Research, 26, 3-24. doi:10.1177/104649649526100110.1177/1046496495261001
30.
YatesJ.OrlikowskiW. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326. doi:10.2307/25877410.2307/258774
31.
YatesJ.OrlikowskiW. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 13-35. doi:10.1177/ 00219436020390010210.1177/ 002194360203900102
