The use of discipline-specific methodologies can, over time, shape what we believe is important to know about a phenomenon, and can hinder initial conversations about that phenomenon among scholars from different disciplines. In this paper, I suggest ways in which interdisciplinary conference cultures and conference attendee interactions might attenuate these methodological influences and increase the probability of effective interdisciplinary collaboration.
AboelelaS. W.LarsonE.BakkenS.CarrasquilloO.FormicolaA.GliedS. A.GebbieK. M. (2006). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42, 329-346. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00621.x
2.
ChengJ. L. C.HeniszW. J.RothK.SwaminathanA. (2009). Advancing interdisciplinary research in the field of international business: Prospects, issues and challenges. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1070-1074. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.41
3.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
LouisM. R.SuttonR. I. (1991). Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44, 55-76. doi:10.1177/001872679104400104
5.
PooleM. S.HollingsheadA. B. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
