Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article addresses educators’ concerns about using asynchronous online discussions in lieu of face-to-face discussions. Drawing from research on asynchronous online education and Bloom’s taxonomy, the authors introduce the system of “original examples” and “value-added comments” that they have developed to promote engaging and meaningful discussions in which students learn course material from one another. The authors describe how to integrate this system into an online course and provide guidelines for instructor facilitation. They offer evidence that online asynchronous discussions facilitate students’ learning and may be more inclusive than face-to-face discussions for some students. Finally, the authors share their observations and suggestions for implementation.

Keywords

asynchronous discussions discussion board distance learning online discussion online learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aggarwal

A. K.

Adlakha

Mersha

(2006). Continuous improvement process in web-based education at a public university. E-Service Journal, 4(2), 3-26.

Al-Jarf

R. S.

(2004). The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 49-57.

Allen

I. E.

Seaman

(2010, January). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/learning_on_demand_sr2010

Al-Shalchi

O. N.

(2009). The effectiveness and development of online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5, 104-108.

Anderson

L. W.

Krathwohl

D. R.

(2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.

Arbaugh

J. B.

(2000). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study of class discussions patterns and student learning in an asynchronous internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24, 213-233.

Arbaugh

J. B.

Benbunan-Fich

(2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 435-447.

Athanassiou

McNett

J. M.

Harvey

(2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education, 27, 533-555.

Axelrod

R. H.

(2010, March). Authentic assessment: Making it relevant to students’ lives. Paper presented at the Annual Mid-Atlantic Organizational Behavior Teaching Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

10.

Baker

S. D.

Comer

D. R.

Martinak

M. L.

(2008). All I’m askin’ is for a little respect: How can we promote civility in our classrooms? Organization Management Journal, 5, 65-80.

11.

Bates

A. W.

(1997). The future of educational technology. Learning Quarterly, 2, 7-16.

12.

Belz

J. A.

Kinginger

(2002). The cross-linguistics development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 189-214.

13.

Berger

N. S.

(1999). Pioneering experiences in distance learning: Lessons learned. Journal of Management Education, 23, 684-690.

14.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Lou

Borokhovski

Wade

Wozney

. . . Huang

(2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.

15.

Berry

G. R.

(2005). Online and face-to-face student discussion: A comparison of outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 6(Fall), 27-35.

16.

Bliss

C. A.

Lawrence

(2009a). From posts to patterns: A metric to characterize discussion board activity in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 15-32.

17.

Bliss

C. A.

Lawrence

(2009b). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? A comparison of small group and whole class discussion board activity in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(4), 25-39.

18.

Bloom

B. S.

(Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.

19.

Brower

H. H.

(2003). On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an on-line learning community. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 22-36.

20.

Carr-Chellman

Dyer

Bremen

(2000). Burrowing through the network wires: Does distance detract from collaborative authentic learning? Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 39-62.

21.

Chalmers

(2009). Teaching online: How to get started. CTSE Newsletter, 5(2), 9.

22.

Conrad

Kanuka

(1999, June). Learning in safety and comfort: Towards managing online learning transactions. Paper presented at the 11th Annual ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education) Conference, Seattle, WA.

23.

Cox

(2008). Developing interpersonal and group dynamics through asynchronous threaded discussions: The use of discussion board in collaborative learning. Education, 128, 553-565.

24.

Dahlin

K. B.

Weingart

L. R.

Hinds

P. J.

(2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107-1123.

25.

Davis

F. D.

(1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.

26.

Felder

R. M.

Silverman

L. K.

(1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681.

27.

Ferdig

R. E.

Roehler

L. R.

(2003-2004). Student uptake in electronic discussions: Examining online discourse in literacy preservice classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 119-136.

28.

Gerber

Scott

Clements

D. H.

Sarama

(2005). Instructor influence on reasoned arguments in discussion boards. Education, Technology, Research and Development, 53(2), 25-39.

29.

Gonzalez-Bueno

(1998). The effects of electronic mail on Spanish L2 discourse. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 55-70.

30.

Gooch

(2011, May 15). Online degrees come of age in Asia. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/16/world/asia/16iht-educLede16.html?pagewanted=1&sq&st=nyt&scp=5

31.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

32.

Hammond

(2005). A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 9-23.

33.

Han

Hill

J. R.

(2006). Building understanding in asynchronous discussions: Examining types of online discourse. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(4), 29-50.

34.

Has the quality of online learning kept up with its growth? (2010). Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(11), B42-B46.

35.

Hazari

(2004). Strategy for assessment of online course discussions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 349-355.

36.

Heyman

(2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter134/heyman134.html

37.

Ivancevich

J. M.

Gilbert

J. A.

Konopaske

(2009). Studying and facilitating dialogue in select management classes. Journal of Management Education, 33, 196-208.

38.

Kember

(1996). Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

39.

Knowlton

D. S.

Knowlton

H. M.

Davis

(2000). The whys and hows of online discussions. Syllabus, 13(10), 54-58.

40.

Krentler

K. A.

Willis-Flurry

L. A.

(2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of on-line discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 316-321.

41.

Landry

B. L.

Griffeth

Hartman

(2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 87-99.

42.

Levine

S. J.

(2007). The online discussion board. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(133), 67-74.

43.

Lunney

Frederickson

Spark

McDuffie

(2008). Facilitating critical thinking through online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 85-97.

44.

Mazzolini

Maddison

(2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40, 237-254.

45.

Mazzolini

Maddison

(2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49, 193-213.

46.

McComb

(1994). Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses. Communication Education, 43, 159-170.

47.

McKeachie

W. J.

(2002). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

48.

Mueller

(2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol1_no1_mueller.htm

49.

Neidorf

(2006). Teach beyond your reach: An instructor’s guide to developing and running successful distance learning classes, workshops, training sessions and more. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

50.

Page

Mukherjee

(2007). Promoting critical-thinking skills by using negotiation exercises. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 251-257.

51.

Palloff

R. M.

Pratt

(2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

52.

Pelz

(2010). (My) three principles of effective online pedagogy. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 103-116.

53.

Prensky

(2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants: Part I. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

54.

Rainsbury

Malcolm

(2003). Extending the classroom boundaries: An evaluation of an asynchronous discussion board. Accounting Education, 12, 49-61.

55.

Robinson

C. C.

Hullinger

(2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101-108.

56.

Rollag

(2010). Teaching business cases online through discussion boards: Strategies and best practices. Journal of Management Education, 34, 499-526.

57.

Schallert

D. L.

Chiang

Y.-H. V.

Park

Jordona

M. E.

Lee

Cheng

A.-C. J.

. . . Song

(2009). Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions. Computers & Education, 53, 713-725.

58.

Shaw

M. E.

(1983). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

59.

Shea

Swan

Fredericksen

Pickett

(2001, September). Student satisfaction and reported learning in the SUNY Learning Network: Interaction and beyond—social presence in asynchronous learning networks. Retrieved from http://tlt.suny.edu/originaldocumentation/library/researchsln/student01.pdf

60.

Vlachopoulos

Cowan

(2010). Reconceptualising moderation in asynchronous online discussions using grounded theory. Distance Education, 31, 23-36.

61.

Vonderwell

Liang

Alderman

(2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 309-328.

62.

Wiggins

G. P.

(1993). Assessing student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

63.

Williams

R. S.

Humphrey

(2007). Understanding and fostering interaction in threaded discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(2), 129-143.

64.

Woo

Reeves

T. C.

(2008). Interaction in asynchronous web-based learning environments: Strategies supported by educational research. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 179-194.

65.

Young

(2008). Structuring asynchronous discussions to incorporate learning principles in an online class: One professor’s course analysis. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4, 217-225.

66.

Zemsky

Massy

W. F.

(2004). Thwarted innovation: What happened to e-learning and why (Final Report for The Weatherstation Project of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania). Retrieved from http://www.thelearningalliance.info/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.02 MB

0.03 MB

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

25.79 MB