What are the most effective and efficient ways to teach business cases online, specifically in asynchronous electronic discussion boards? This article describes several design strategies and approaches used by instructors at Babson College to structure and facilitate online case discussions in our blended Fast Track MBA program.
Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. ( 2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States (Sloan-C Consortium Report). Retrieved from http://www.blendedteaching.org/system/files/Blending_In.pdf
2.
Amrein-Beardsley, A., Foulger, T.S., & Toth, M. ( 2007). Examining the development of a hybrid degree program: Using student and instructor data to inform decision-making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 331-357.
3.
Anderson, T. ( 2004). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 273-294). Athasbasca, Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
4.
Arbaugh, J.B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 435-447.
5.
Arter, J., & McTighe, J. ( 2000). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessment and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
6.
Ashford, S.J., & Cummings, L.L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 310-398.
7.
Baker, A.C. ( 2004). Seizing the moment: Talking about "The undiscussables ." Journal of Management Education, 28, 693-706.
8.
Baker, A.C., Jensen, P.J., & Kolb, D.A. ( 2002). Learning and conversation. In A. C. Baker, P. J. Jensen, & D. A. Kolb (Eds.), Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation (pp. 1-13). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
9.
Barnes, L.B., Christensen, C.R., & Hansen, A.J. ( 1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases and readings . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
Bean, J.C., & Peterson, D. ( 1998). Grading class participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 33-40.
11.
Bedi, K. ( 2008). Best practices of faculty in facilitating online asynchronous discussions for higher student satisfaction (U21 Global Working Paper Series, No. 005/2008). Retrieved from http://www.u21global.edu.sg/PartnerAdmin/ViewContent?module=DOCUMENTLIBRARY&oid=157449
12.
Brooke, S.L. ( 2006). Using the case method to teach online classes: Promoting Socratic dialogue and critical thinking skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18, 142-149.
13.
Brookfield, S.D., & Preskill, S. ( 2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd. ed.). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
14.
Brookhart, S.M. ( 2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ACSD.
15.
Caffarella, R.S. ( 1994). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers and staff developers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Christensen, C.R. ( 1991). The discussion teacher in action: Questioning, listening and response. In C. R. Christensen, D. A. Garvin, & A. Sweet (Eds.), Education for judgement: The artistry of discussion leadership (pp. 153-172). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
Clouse, S.F., & Evans, G.E. ( 2003). Graduate business students performance with synchronous and asynchronous interaction e-learning methods. Decision Sciences: The Journal of Innovative Education, 1, 181-202.
18.
Curriculum Innovation Technology Group. (2007 ). Fast Track MBA evaluation of September 2006 cohort-February 2007 survey. Unpublished internal document, Babson College , Babson Park, MA.
19.
Curriculum Innovation Technology Group. (2008 a). Fast Track MBA program: Web syllabus evaluation. March 2008 cohort-August 2008 Survey. Unpublished internal document, Babson College, Babson Park, MA.
20.
Curriculum Innovation Technology Group. (2008 b). Fast Track MBA program: Web syllabus evaluation. Faculty interviews. October 3, 2008. Unpublished internal document, Babson College, Babson Park, MA .
21.
Curriculum Innovation Technology Group. (2008 c). Fast Track MBA program: Web syllabus evaluation. January 2007 Cohort-March 2008 Survey. Unpublished internal document, Babson College, Babson Park, MA.
22.
Dallimore, E.J., Hertenstein, J.H., & Platt, M.B. ( 2006). Nonvoluntary class participation in graduate discussion courses: Effects of grading and cold calling. Journal of Management Education, 30, 354-377.
23.
Desiraju, R., & Gopinath, C. ( 2001). Encouraging participation in case discussions: A comparison of the MIC and the Harvard case method. Journal of Management Education, 24, 394-408.
24.
Dowd, J.J. ( 1992). Case method teaching: Suggestions for practice. Marketing Education Review, 2, 44-28.
25.
Fauske, J., & Wade, S.E. ( 2003). Research to practice online: Conditions that foster democracy, community and critical thinking in computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 137-153.
26.
Garrison, D.R., & Vaughan, N.D. ( 2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Gilbert, P., & Dabbagh, N. ( 2005) How to structure online discussions for meaningful discourse: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 5-18.
28.
Gill, T.G. ( 2005). A protocol for online case discussions. Decision Sciences: Journal of Innovative Education, 3, 143-150.
29.
Greenhalgh, A.M. ( 2007). Case method teaching as science and art: A metaphoric approach and curricular application. Journal of Management Education, 31, 181-194.
30.
Gribbins, M.L., Hadidi, R., Urbaczewski, A., & Vician, C. ( 2007). Technology-enhanced learning in blended learning environments: A report on standard practices. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 741-759.
31.
Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. ( 1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431.
32.
Hazari, S. ( 2004). Strategy for assessment of online course discussions . Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 349-355.
33.
Hiltz, S.R., & Shea, P. ( 2004). The student in the online classroom. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (145-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Huba, M.E., & Freed, J.E. ( 2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campus: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
35.
Kolb, D.A., Baker, A.C., & Jensen, P.J. ( 2002). Conversation as experiential learning. In A. C. Baker, P. J. Jensen, & D. A. Kolb (Eds.), Conversational learning: An experiential approach to knowledge creation (pp. 51-66). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
36.
Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. ( 2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212.
37.
Krentler, K.A., & Willis-Flurry, L.A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 316-321.
38.
Larsen, E. ( 1998). Feedback: Multiple purposes for management classrooms . Journal of Management Education, 22, 49-62.
39.
Lazarus, B.D. ( 2003). Teaching courses online: How much time does it take? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 47-54.
40.
Lin, S.Y., & Overbaugh, R.C. (2007). The effect of student choice of online discussion format on tiered achievement and student satisfaction . Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 399-415.
Mainkar, A.V. ( 2008). A student-empowered system for measuring and weighing participation in class discussion. Journal of Management Education , 32, 23-37.
43.
May, G.L., & Short, D. ( 2003). Gardening in cyberspace: A metaphor to enhance online teaching and learning. Journal of Management Education, 27, 673-693.
44.
Meyer, K.A. ( 2005). The ebb and flow of online discussions: What Bloom can tell us about our student’s conversations. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(1), 53-63.
45.
Michaelsen, L.K., & Schultheiss, E.E. (1989). Making feedback helpful . Journal of Management Education, 13, 109-113.
46.
Moore, J.L., & Marra, R.M. ( 2005). A comparative analysis of online discussion participation protocols. Journal of Research on Technology in Education , 38, 191-212.
47.
Powers, J., Burrows, J., & Powers, S. ( 2001). Using the case method in distributed environments: Opportunities and challenges. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference on Distance Learning and Teaching. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/01_80.pdf
48.
Seaman, J. ( 2009). Online learning as a strategic asset-Volume II: The paradox of faculty voices: Views and experiences with online learning-Results of a national faculty survey (A report on the Online Education Benchmarking Study conducted by the APLU-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning). Retrieved from http://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=1877
49.
Shea, P. ( 2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 73-128.
50.
Shea, P., Swan, K., Li, C.S., & Pickett, A. ( 2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4), 59-82.
51.
Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. ( 2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning . Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 309-328.
52.
Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. ( 2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning . Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 213-230.
53.
Vygotsky L. ( 1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
54.
Webb, H.W., Gill, G., & Poe, G. ( 2005). Teaching with the case method online: Pure versus hybrid approaches. Decision Sciences: Journal of Innovative Education , 3, 223-250.
55.
Weber, M.M., & Kirk, D.J. ( 2000). Teaching teachers to teach cases: It’s not what you know, It’s what you ask. Marketing Education Review , 10(2), 59-67.
