AndersonN. R.WestM. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3%3C235::AID-JOB837%3E3.0.CO;2-C
3.
BarrickM. R.BradleyB. H.Kristof-BrownA. L.ColbertA. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525781
BellS. T.VilladoA. J.LukasikM. A.BelauL.BriggsA. L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001
6.
BionW. R. (1961). Experiences in groups. Tavistock Publications.
7.
BishopJ. W.ScottK. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439–450. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.439
8.
BlanchardA. L.CaudillL. E.WalkerL. S. (2020). Developing an entitativity measure and distinguishing it from antecedents and outcomes within online and face-to-face groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 23(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217743577
9.
BollenK. A.HoyleR. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/69.2.479.
10.
BrownR. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups. Blackwell.
11.
CampbellD. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830030103
12.
CohenS. G.BaileyD. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300303
13.
CrawfordE. R.LePineJ. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamworkfigural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0206
CruzK. S. (2021). Does anyone care about external validity? A call (or plea?) for more OB/HR research from multiple organizations/industries, panels, and publicly available datasets. Group and Organization Management, 46(6), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211055879
16.
CruzK. S.ZagenczykT. J.GriepY. (2022). (Re)introducing a new section generally and a special section in this issue specifically: GOMusings (Vol. 47, pp. 891–898). Group and Organization Management. https://doi/10.1177/10596011221117436
17.
CummingsJ. N.HaasM. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 316–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.777
18.
EdmondsonA. C.NembhardI. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x
ForsythD. R. (2021). Recent advances in the study of group cohesion. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 25(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000163
21.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
22.
GibsonC. B.Zellmer-BruhnM. E. (2001). Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667088
23.
GillM. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113518348
24.
GiorgiA. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
25.
GundlachM.ZivnuskaS.StonerJ. (2006). Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model. Human Relations, 59(12), 1603–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706073193
26.
GusfieldJ. R. (1975). The community: A critical response. Harper Colophon.
27.
HackmanJ. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Prentice-Hall.
28.
HeermanB. (1997). Building team spirit: Activities for inspiring and energizing teams. McGraw-Hill.
29.
HenryK. B.ArrowH.CariniB. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30(5), 558–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649903000504
30.
HoltR.SandbergJ. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In TsoukasH.ChiaR. (Eds.), Philosophy and organization theory (Vol. 32, pp. 215–249). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
31.
HuckmanR. S.StaatsB. R. (2011). Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 13(3), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1100.0321
32.
HumphreyS. E.AimeF. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.904140
33.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
34.
KatzenbachJ. R.SmithD. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard business review. March–April (pp. 111–120). Harvard Business Press.
35.
KozlowskiS. W.IlgenD. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
36.
LarsonJ. R. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. Psychology Press.
37.
LembkeS.WilsonM. G. (1998). Putting the “team” into teamwork: Alternative theoretical contributions for contemporary management practice. Human Relations, 51(7), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679805100704
38.
LickelB.HamiltonD. L.WieczorkowskaG.LewisA.ShermanS. J.UhlesA. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.223
39.
LiuT.DuanL.DaiR.PelowskiM.ZhuC. (2021). Team-work, team-brain: exploring synchrony and team interdependence in a nine-person drumming task via multiparticipant hyperscanning and inter-brain network topology with fNIRS. NeuroImage, 237, 118147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118147
40.
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
41.
MathieuJ. E.TannenbaumS. I.DonsbachJ. S.AlligerG. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503014
MortensenM. (2014). Constructing the team: The antecedents and effects of membership model divergence. Organization Science, 25(3), 909–931. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0881
44.
MortensenM.HaasM. R. (2018). Perspective—rethinking teams: From bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organization Science, 29(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1198
45.
MortensenM.HindsP. J. (2001). Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(3), 212–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022856
46.
MortensenM.HindsP. (2002). Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams. In HindsP.KieslerS. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 283–308). MIT Press.
47.
O’LearyM. B.MortensenM.WoolleyA. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0275
48.
SalasE.GrossmanR.HughesA. M.CoultasC. W. (2015). Measuring team cohesion: Observations from the science. Human Factors, 57(3), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578267
49.
SandersP. (1982). Phenomenology: A new way of viewing organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.2307/257327
50.
SchutzA. (1964). Studies in social theory: Collected papers II. Martinus Nijhoff.
51.
SilvaT.CunhaM. P. E.CleggS. R.NevesP.RegoA.RodriguesR. A. (2014). Smells like team spirit: Opening a paradoxical black box. Human Relations, 67(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713492349
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Individual empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E.SalasE.CohenD. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.x
56.
TaylorS. E. (2011). Social Support: A Review. In The Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 189–214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
Van ManenM. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Althouse Press.
58.
VangriekenK.BoonA.DochyF.KyndtE. (2017). Group, Team, or Something in Between? Conceptualising and Measuring Team Entitativity. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.297
59.
VangriekenK.DochyF.RaesE. (2016). Team learning in teacher teams: Team entitativity as a bridge between teams-in-theory and teams-in-practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0279-0
60.
VangriekenK.DochyF.RaesE.KyndtE. (2013). Team Entitativity and Teacher Teams in Schools: Towards a Typology. Frontline Learning Research, 1(2), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.23
WagemanR.GardnerH.MortensenM. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1775
63.
WernerJ. M.LesterS. W. (2001). Applying a team effectiveness framework to the performance of student case teams. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1004