While authoritarian regimes are often characterized by their civil liberty restrictions, some dictatorships acknowledge the ethnolinguistic diversity of their population. Are minorities in multiethnic authoritarian states more likely to trust the government when their language is recognized? In this paper, we argue while recognition of a group’s language improves trust in democracies through a substantive representation mechanism, the same cannot be said in authoritarian regimes. Instead, recognition is a mere symbolic gesture. Such window-dressing efforts call attention to the horizontal inequality between hegemon and minority groups—and such, minority language recognition is associated with negative political trust. We test our argument with the World Values Survey. By identifying which minority groups have been afforded linguistic recognition, we find evidence of a significant—but negative—link between recognition and political trust.
AcemogluDaronRobinsonJames. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorships and Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AkinouMohamed. 2021. “Tamazight, an Official Language of Morocco, Is Getting More Attention.” Al-Fanar Media. (October 1).
3.
AlesinaAlbertoArnaudDevleeschauwerEasterlyWilliamKurlatSergioWacziargRomain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth8: 155–194.
4.
Andrews-LeeCaitlinLiuAmy H. 2020. “The Language of Legacies: The Politics of Evoking Dead Leaders.” Political Research Quarterly74 (3): 658–673.
5.
AskvikSteinarJamilIshtiaqDhakalTek Nath. 2011. “Citizens’ Trust in Public and Political Institutions in Nepal.” International Political Science Review32: 417–437.
6.
BalcellsAlbert. 1996. Catalan Nationalism: Past and Present. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
7.
BarberBenjaminMillerCharles. 2019. “Propaganda and Combat Motivation.” World Politics71 (3): 457–502.
8.
BartkusViva Ona. 1999. The Dynamic of Secession. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BaumMatthewLakeDavid A.. 2003. “The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital.” American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 333–347.
10.
BirnirJóhanna KSatanaNil. 2020. Alternatives in Mobilization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BlommaertJan. 2011. “The Long Language-Ideological Debate in Belgium.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses6 (3): 241–256.
12.
BranchadellAlbert. 1999. “Language policy in Catalonia: Making Liberalism 2 Come True.” Language and Communication19 (4): 289–303.
13.
BrattonKathleen AHaynieKerry LReingoldBeth. 2007. “Agenda Setting and African American Women in State Legislatures.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy28 (3–4): 71–96.
14.
BrattonMichaelvan de WalleNicholas. 1997. Democratic Transitions in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BrownDavid SHunterWendy. 2004. “Democracy and Human Capital Formation: Education Spending in Latin America 1980 to 1997.” Comparative Political Studies37 (7): 842–864.
16.
BurnsJohn P. 2003. “‘Downsizing’ the Chinese state.” The China Quarterly175: 775–802.
17.
CantoniDavideChenYuyuYangDavid YYuchtmanNoamZhangY Jane. 2017. “Curriculum and Ideology.” Journal of Political Economy125 (2): 338–392.
18.
CardinalLinda. 2005. “The Ideological Limits of Linguistic Diversity in Canada.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development26 (6): 481–495.
19.
ChanleyVirginia ARudolphThomas J.RahnWendy M.. 2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government.” Public Opinion Quarterly64 (3): 239–256.
20.
CheibubJose AGandhiJenniferVreelandJames R.. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice143 (1–2): 67–101.
21.
ChenJidongXuYiqing. 2017. “Information Manipulation and Reform in Authoritarian Regimes.” Political Science Research and Methods5 (1): 163–178.
22.
CedermanLars-ErikWimmerAndreasMinBrian. 2010. “Why do ethnic groups rebel?” World Politics62 (01): 87–119.
23.
ClaessonChristian. 2022. “Vernacular Resistance: Catalan, Basque, and Galician Opposition to Francoist Monolingualism” In Vernaculars in an Age of World Literature, edited by KullbergChristinaWatsonDavid, 51–80. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
24.
CsataZsomborHlatkyRomanLiuAmy H. 2021a. “How to Head Count Ethnic Minorities: Validity of Census Surveys Versus Other Identification Strategies.” East European Politics37 (3): 572–592.
25.
CsataZsomborRomanHlatkyLiuAmy H.YoungAriel Pitre. 2021b. “The Economic Effects of the Territoriality Principle: Evidence from Transylvania, Romania.” Language Problems and Language Planning45 (2): 164–186.
26.
DebsAlexandreGoemansHein E.. 2010. “Regime Type, The Fate of Leaders, and War.” American Political Science Review104: 430–445.
27.
DowlingAndrew. 2018. “Prohibition, Tolerance, Co-option: Cultural Appropriation and Francoism in Catalonia, 1939–75.” Contemporary European History27 (3): 370–386. doi:10.1017/S0960777318000267.
28.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: John Wiley and Son.
29.
EspinalRosarioHartlynJonathanKellyJana Morgan. 2006. “Performance Still Matters.” Comparative Political Studies39 (2): 200–223.
30.
FitzgeraldJenniferWolakJennifer. 2016. “The Roots of Trust in Local Government in Western Europe.” International Political Science Review37: 130–146.
31.
FoxworthRaymondLiuAmy H.Edward SokheyAnand. 2015. “Incorporating Native American History into the Curriculum: Descriptive Representation or Campaign Contributions?” Social Science Quarterly96: 955–969.
32.
FreitagMarkusBühlmannMarc. 2009. “Crafting Trust the Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies42: 1537–1566.
33.
GandhiJennifer. 2008. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
GandhiJenniferPrzeworskiAdam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies40 (11): 1279–1301.
35.
GandhiJenniferReuterOra John. 2011. “Economic Performance and Elite Defection from Hegemonic Parties.” British Journal of Political Science41: 83–110.
36.
GeddesBarbara. 2006. “Why Parties and Elections in Authoritarian Regimes?” Unpublished Manuscript.
37.
GehlbachScottKeeferPhilip. 2012. “Private Investments and the Institutionalization of Collective Action in Autocracies.” Journal of Politics74 (2): 621–635.
38.
GimpelsonVladimirTreismanDaniel. 2002. “Fiscal games and public employment.” World Politics54 (2): 145–183.
39.
GreeneKenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
GrenobleLenore A. 2003. Language Policy in the Soviet Union. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41.
HoddieMatthewHartzellCaroline. 2003. “Civil War Settlements and the Implementation of Military Power-Sharing Arrangements.” Journal of Peace Research40 (3): 303–320.
42.
HorváthIstvánCsataZsomborSzekelyIstván. 2021. Utilizarea Limbii Materne la Nivelul Unităților Administrative Locale: Estimare Costuri. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Institutul Pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităţilor Naţionale.
43.
HuebertErin T.LiuAmy H.. 2017. “Ethnic Identity and Attitudes Toward State Institutions.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (4): 561–579.
44.
HuYue. 2020. “Cultural Marker versus Authority Marker: How Do Language Attitudes Affect Political Trust?” Political Psychology41 (4): 699–716.
45.
HuangKai-PingSchulerPaul. 2018. “A Status Quo Theory of Generalized Trust: Why Trust May Reduce the Prospects for Democratic Transition in East Asia.” Comparative Politics51 (1): 121–139.
JapJangai. 2021. Winning Hearts and Minds: Street-level Bureaucracy and Ethnic Minorities’ Attachment to the State in Myanmar. PhD Dissertation. Washington, DC: Department of Political Science: George Washington University.
48.
KaoJay C. 2021. “Family Matters: Education and the (Conditional) Effect of State Indoctrination in China.” Public Opinion Quarterly85 (1): 54–78.
49.
KittilsonMiki CaulSchwindt-BayerLeslie. 2010. “Engaging Citizens: The Role of Power-Sharing Institutions.” The Journal of Politics72 (4): 990–1002.
50.
LaitinDavid D. 1977. Politics, Language, and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LiuAmy H. 2015. Standardizing Diversity. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
53.
LiuAmy H. 2017. “Democracy and Minority Language Recognition: Tyranny of the Majority and the Conditional Effects of Group Size.” Democratization24 (3): 544–565.
54.
LiuAmy H.BrownDavid S.DunnMeghan H.. 2015. “Minority Language Recognition and Trust: Evidence from Twenty-Five Democracies.” Taiwan Journal of Democracy11 (2): 113–138.
55.
LiuAmy H.GandhiJenniferCurtisBell.. 2018. “Minority Languages in Dictatorships.” Political Science Research and Methods6 (4): 639–660.
56.
LiuAmy H.Wilson SokheySarahRooseveltMegan. 2017. “Trade and the Recognition of Commercial Lingua Francas.” Economics and Politics29 (1): 48–68.
57.
Maddy-WeitzmanBruce. 2012. “Arabization and its Discontents: The Rise of the Amazigh Movement in North Africa.” The Journal of the Middle East and Africa3 (2): 109–135.
58.
Maddy-WeitzmanBruce. 2017. “Challenging the State, Redefining the Nation: The Contemporary Amazigh Movement in Turbulent Times.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics23 (4): 413–430.
59.
MagaloniBeatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MaleskyEdumundSchulerPaul. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review104 (3): 482–502.
61.
MaukMarlene. 2020. “Disentangling an Elusive Relationship: How Democratic Value Orientations Affect Political Trust in Different Regimes.” Political Research Quarterly73 (2): 366–380.
62.
MedeirosMike. 2017. “The Language of Conflict.” Ethnicities17 (5): 627–645.
63.
MedeirosMikeFournierPatrickBenet-MartínezVerónica. 2017. “The Language of Threat.” Acta Politica52 (1): 1–22.
64.
MedeirosMikevon SchoultzÅsaHannaWass. 2019. “Language Matters? Antecedents and Political Consequences of Support for Bilingualism in Canada and Finland.” Comparative European Politics18: 532–559.
65.
MirandaCarlos R. 1990. The Stroessner Era: Authoritarian Rule in Paraguay. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
66.
MohsinAmena. 2003. “Language, Identity, and the State in Bangladesh.” In Fighting Words, edited by BrownMichaelGangulyŠumit, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
67.
MorrisStephen D.KlesnerJoseph L.. 2010. “Corruption and trust.” Comparative Political Studies43: 1258–1285.
68.
NewtonKenneth. 2001. “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy.” International Political Science Review22: 201–214.
69.
O’LearyBrendan. 2019. “Consociation in the Present.” Swiss Political Science Review25 (4): 556–574.
70.
OstwaldKaiOngElvinGueorguievDimitar. 2019. “Language Politics, Education, and Ethnic Integration.” Politics, Groups, and Identities7 (1): 89–108.
71.
PepinskyThomas. 2009. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Pujol CasademontEnric. 2020. “Culture, Language and Politics. The Catalan Cultural Resistance During the Franco Regime (1939-1977).” Catalan Historical Review13: 69–84.
73.
RicksJacob I. 2020. “The Effects of Language on Voter Opinion: Results from a Survey Experiment in Thailand.” Political Behavior42 (1): 83–104.
74.
RothsteinBoStolleDietlind. 2008. “The State and Social Capital.” Comparative Politics40: 441–459.
75.
SafranWilliamLiuAmy H. 2012. “Nation-Building, Collective Identity, and Language Choices.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics18: 269–292.
76.
SelwayJoel Sawat. 2011. “The Measurement of Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Other Multidimensional Cleavage Structures.” Political Analysis19: 48–65.
77.
SmithBenjamin. 2004. “Oil Wealth and Regime Survival in the Developing World, 1960-1999.” American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 232–246.
78.
StockmannDaniela. 2013. Media Commercialization and Authoritarian Rule in China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
79.
StoyanAlissandra T.NiedzwieckiSaraMorganJanaHartlynJonathanEspinalRosario. 2016. “Trust in Government Institutions.” International Political Science Review37: 18–35.
StewartFrances. 2005. “Horizontal Inequalities: A Neglected Dimension of Development.” In Wider Perspectives on Global Development, 101–135. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
82.
TangWenfangHuYueJinShuai. 2016. “Affirmative Inaction: Education, Language Proficiency, and Socioeconomic Attainment Among China’s Uyghur Minority.” Chinese Sociological Review48 (4): 346–366.
83.
WintrobeRonald. 2001. “How to Understand, and Deal with Dictatorship: An Economist’s View.” Economics of Governance2: 35–58.
84.
WongTimothy Ka-yingWuPo-sanMichael HsiaoHsin-Huang. 2011. “The Bases of Political Trust in Six Asian Societies.” International Political Science Review32: 263–281.
85.
WrightJoseph. 2008. “Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain?” American Journal of Political Science52 (2): 322–343.
86.
WuChun-Ying. 2021a. “Hoklo speakers and Taiwanese identity in South Taiwan.” Asian Politics & Policy13 (1): 150–164.
87.
WuChun-Ying. 2021b. Political Regimes and Minority Language Policies: Evidence from Taiwan and Southeast Asia. PhD Dissertation. Austin, TX: Department of Government: University of Texas at Austin.
88.
VasavakulThaveeporn. 2003. “Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Vietnam.” In Fighting Words, edited by BrownMichaelGangulyŠumit, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
89.
VoigtländerNicoVothHans-Joachim. 2015. “Nazi Indoctrination and Anti-Semitic Beliefs in Germany.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112 (26): 7931–7936.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
