In recent years, the rural-urban divide has not only made its way back into political science, but has also been given an entirely new angle by investigating place of living as its own social identity. However, research is still in its early stages and studies so far focus on linear explanations of place-based resentment. This paper studies place in the light of social identity theory and investigates how place of living and place-based identity interact in shaping place-based resentment. Original survey data on around 4000 respondents from Switzerland from 2022 with a novel measure of place-based identity and resentment is used. A distinction is made not only between rural and urban residents, but also between the suburbanites. Results show that rural residents hold the highest levels of identity and resentment, while suburban residents hold higher levels of resentment than urban ones do. Findings show that there is a moderating effect, whereby the rural-urban divide in resentment increases with place-based identity, while the suburban-urban gap diminishes with increasing place-based identity. These differences in place-based identity and resentment could explain the rural-urban divide in political attitudes and behavior.
BorweinSophieLucasJack. 2021. “Municipal Identity and City Interests.” Political Behavior; Online First. doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09735-5.
2.
BorweinSophieLucasJack. 2023. “Asymmetries in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Place-Based Resentment.” Political Geography105: 102904. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102904.
3.
BrookesKevinCappellinaBartolomeo. 2023. “Political Behavior in France: The Impact of the Rural-Urban Divide.” French Politics21: 104–124. doi:10.1057/s41253-022-00204-x.
4.
BrooksSally. 2020. “Brexit and the Politics of the Rural.” Sociologica Ruralis60 (4): 790–809. doi:10.1111/soru.12281.
5.
CainElise J. 2021. “Place-Based Identity: A Model.” New Directions for Student Services2020 (171–172): 11–19. doi:10.1002/ss.20360.
6.
CramerKatherine J.2016. The Politics of Resentment. Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
7.
DaneriDaniel R.KrasnyMarianne E.StedmanRichard C.. 2021. “Place-Based Identity and Framing in Local Environmental Politics.” Review of Policy Research38 (2): 180–202. doi:10.1111/ropr.12415.
8.
EllisonChristopher G.FangQijuanFlannellyKevin J.StecklerRebecca A.. 2013. “Spiritual Struggles and Mental Health: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Religious Identity.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion23 (3): 214–229. doi:10.1080/10508619.2012.759868.
9.
Frasure-YokleyLorrieWilcox-ArchuletaBryan. 2019. “Geographic Identity and Attitudes toward Undocumented Immigrants.” Political Research Quarterly72 (4): 944–959. doi:10.1177/1065912919843349.
HoggMichael A. 2016. “Social Identity Theory.” In Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives, edited by McKeownShelleyHajiReeshmaFergusonNeil, 3–18. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
14.
HuddyLeonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology22 (1): 127–156.
15.
HuijsmansTwan. 2023a. “Place Resentment in “The Places that Don’t Matter”: Explaining the Geographic Divide in Populist and Anti-immigration Attitudes.” Acta Politica58 (2): 285-305. doi:10.1057/s41269-022-00244-9.
16.
HuijsmansTwan. 2023b. “Why Some Places Don’t Seem to Matter: Socioeconomic, Cultural and Political Determinants of Place Resentment.” Electoral Studies83. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102622.
JacobsNicholas F.MunisB. Kal. 2019. “Place-Based Imagery and Voter Evaluations: Experimental Evidence on the Politics of Place.” Political Research Quarterly72 (2): 263–277. doi:10.1177/1065912918781035.
19.
JacobsNicholas FMunisB K. 2020. “Staying in Place: Federalism and the Political Economy of Place Attachment.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism50 (4): 544–565. doi:10.1093/publius/pjaa024.
20.
JacobsNicholas F.MunisB. Kal. 2022. “Place-Based Resentment in Contemporary U.S. Elections: The Individual Sources of America’s Urban-Rural Divide.” Political Research Quarterly0 (0): 1–16. doi:10.1177/10659129221124864.
21.
JenningsWillStokerGerry. 2016. “The Bifurcation of Politics: Two Englands.” The Political Quarterly87 (3): 372–382. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12228.
22.
JenningsWillStokerGerry. 2019. “The Divergent Dynamics of Cities and Towns: Geographical Polarisation and Brexit.” The Political Quarterly90 (S2): 155–166. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12612. Britain Beyond Brexit.
23.
KüblerDaniel. 2022. “Agglomerationen.” In Handbuch der Schweizer Politik, edited by PapadopoulosYannisSciariniPascalVatterAdrianHäusermannSiljaEmmeneggerPatrickFossatiFlavia. 7th ed.343–370. Basel: NZZ Libro. komplett überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage.
24.
LeeNeilMorrisKatyKemenyThomas. 2018. “Immobility and the Brexit Vote.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society11 (1): 143–163. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx027.
25.
LemWinnie. 2020. “Notes on Militant Populism in Contemporary France: Contextualizing the Gilets Jaunes.” Dialectical Anthropology44 (4): 397–413. doi:10.1007/s10624-020-09595-1.
26.
LyonsJeffreyUtychStephen M.. 2021. “You’re Not from Here!: The Consequences of Urban and Rural Identities.” Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09680-3.
27.
McKayLawrenceJenningsWillStokerGerry. 2021. “Political Trust in the “Places that Don’t Matter”.” Frontiers in Political Science3: 642236. doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.642236.
28.
MitschFriederLeeNeilRalph MorrowElizabeth. 2021. “Faith No More? The Divergence of Political Trust between Urban and Rural Europe.” Political Geography89. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102426.
29.
MonnatShannon M.BrownDavid L.. 2017. “More Than a Rural Revolt: Landscapes of Despair and the 2016 Presidential Election.” Journal of Rural Studies55: 227–236. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.010.
30.
MunisB. Kal. 2021. “Place, Candidate Roots, and Voter Preferences in an Age of Partisan Polarization: Observational and Experimental Evidence.” Political Geography85: 102345. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102345.
31.
MunisB. Kal. 2022. “Us Over Here Versus Them Over There…Literally: Measuring Place Resentment in American Politics.” Political Behavior44 (3): 1057–78. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09641-2.
32.
NealSarahGawlewiczAnnaHeleyJesseJonesRhys Dafydd. 2021. “Rural Brexit? The Ambivalent Politics of Rural Community, Migration and Dependency.” Journal of Rural Studies82: 176–183. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.017.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
35.
ScalaDante J.JohnsonKenneth M.. 2016. “Red Rural, Blue Rural: The Geography of Presidential Voting in Rural America.” The Geography Teacher13 (3): 118–123. doi:10.1080/19338341.2016.1200339.
36.
ScalaDante J.JohnsonKenneth M.. 2017. “Political Polarization along the Rural-Urban Continuum? the Geography of the Presidential Vote, 2000-2016.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science672 (1): 162–84. doi:10.1177/0002716217712696.
37.
ScheussUrs. 2013. Konfliktherd Agglomeration. Politische Gegensätze im urbanen Raum der Schweiz. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
38.
SchoeneMatthew. 2019. “European Disintegration? Euroscepticism and Europe’s Rural/Urban Divide.” European Politics and Society20 (3): 348–364. doi:10.1080/23745118.2018.1542768.
39.
Schulte-CloosJuliaBauerPaul C.. 2021. “Local Candidates, Place-Based Identities, and Electoral Success.” Political Behavior; Online First. doi:10.1007/s11109-021-09712-y.
40.
Schweizerische Volkspartei(SVP).2021. Die Schmarotzer-Politik der links-grünen Städte: Positionspapier der Schweizerischen Volkspartei zum Stadt-Land-Graben in der Schweiz. Positions paper. Bern: Schweizerische Volkspartei.
41.
StedmanRichard C.2002. “Toward a Social Psychology of Place: Predicting Behavior from Place-Based Cognitions, Attitude, and Identity.” Environment and Behavior34 (5): 561–581.
42.
StröbeleMaarit Felicitas. 2017. What Does Suburbia Vote for? Changed Settlement Patterns and Political Preferences in Three European Countries. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
43.
TajfelHenri. 1972. “Social Categorization. English Manuscript of “La Catégorisation Sociale”.” In Introduction à La Psychologie Sociale, edited by MoscoviciSerge, Vol. 1, 272–302. Paris: Larousse.
44.
TajfelHenriTurnerJohn. 2004. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Political Psychology: Key Readings, edited by JostJohn T.SidaniusJim, 276–293. New York, Hove: Psychology Press.
45.
TrujilloKristin Lunz. 2022. “Rural Identity as a Contributing Factor to Anti-intellectualism in the U.S.” Political Behavior44: 1509–1532. doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09770-w.
46.
TrujilloKristin LunzCrowleyZack. 2022. “Symbolic versus Material Concerns of Rural Consciousness in the United States.” Political Geography96 (June): 102658. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102658.
47.
WilsonMarc StewartLiuJames H.. 2003. “Social Dominance Orientation and Gender: The Moderating Role of Gender Identity.” British Journal of Social Psychology42 (2): 187–198. doi:10.1348/014466603322127175.
48.
WuthnowRobert. 2018. The Left behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
49.
ZumbrunnAlinaFreitagMarkus. 2023. “The Geography of Autocracy. Regime Preferences along the Rural-Urban Divide in 32 Countries.” Democratization30 (4). doi:10.1080/13510347.2023.2171995.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
